Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Administrative Law (14)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (4)
- Environmental Law (2)
- Legislation (2)
- Supreme Court of the United States (2)
-
- Agency (1)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (1)
- Courts (1)
- Disability Law (1)
- Environmental Policy (1)
- Immigration Law (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Labor and Employment Law (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Natural Resources Law (1)
- Public Administration (1)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (1)
- Public Policy (1)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (1)
- Water Law (1)
- Institution
- Publication Year
- Publication
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1 - 16 of 16
Full-Text Articles in Law
Concerning Catskill: Missed Opportunity, Broken Precedent And The Plight Of American Waters, Chase Corey
Concerning Catskill: Missed Opportunity, Broken Precedent And The Plight Of American Waters, Chase Corey
William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review
As society progresses and the population grows, uninhibited and unregulated pollution has become a pressing dilemma for current and future generations. Whether it is plastic on the beaches, oil in the oceans, or smog in the air, modern citizens of the Earth face a daily onslaught of visible consequences from the actions of polluters. But what about the not so visible consequences? Every day there is pollution occurring at a microscopic level, yet many are unaware of its presence. This infinitesimal issue is nutrient pollution, and despite its diminutive cause, it is deeply affecting one of the world’s most vital …
Litigating Epa Rules: A Fifty-Year Retrospective Of Environmental Rulemaking In The Courts, Cary Coglianese, Daniel E. Walters
Litigating Epa Rules: A Fifty-Year Retrospective Of Environmental Rulemaking In The Courts, Cary Coglianese, Daniel E. Walters
All Faculty Scholarship
Over the last fifty years, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has found itself repeatedly defending its regulations before federal judges. The agency’s engagement with the federal judiciary has resulted in prominent Supreme Court decisions, such as Chevron v. NRDC and Massachusetts v. EPA, which have left a lasting imprint on federal administrative law. Such prominent litigation has also fostered, for many observers, a longstanding impression of an agency besieged by litigation. In particular, many lawyers and scholars have long believed that unhappy businesses or environmental groups challenge nearly every EPA rule in court. Although some empirical studies have …
Chevron's Consensus, Evan J. Criddle
Chevron Deference And Treaty Interpretation, Evan J. Criddle
Chevron Deference And Treaty Interpretation, Evan J. Criddle
Evan J. Criddle
No abstract provided.
Making America Safe Again: The Proper Interpretation Of [Section] 1101 (A)(43)(S) Of The Immigration And Nationality Act From Both A Chevron And A Public Policy Perspective, Jon Derenne
Cornell Law Review
The law must give our government every opportunity to protect Americans from the actions of criminal alien residents. This includes interpreting our existing statutes to provide the government with the broadest authority possible to deport resident aliens who violate our laws. As such, the optimal interpretation of the "relating to obstruction of justice" language within the INA is to implement the common sense textual interpretation applied by the Third Circuit, reading the statute broadly to encompass crimes that are listed in the obstruction of justice heading in the U.S. Code, as well as other logically related crimes.
Chevron's Interstitial Steps, Cary Coglianese
Chevron's Interstitial Steps, Cary Coglianese
All Faculty Scholarship
The Chevron doctrine’s apparent simplicity has long captivated judges, lawyers, and scholars. According to the standard formulation, Chevron involves just two straightforward steps: (1) Is a statute clear? (2) If not, is the agency’s interpretation of the statute reasonable? Despite the influence of this two-step framework, Chevron has come under fire in recent years. Some critics bemoan what they perceive as the Supreme Court’s incoherent application of the Chevron framework over time. Others argue that Chevron’s second step, which calls for courts to defer to reasonable agency interpretations of ambiguous statutory provisions, amounts to an abdication of judicial responsibility. …
Statutory Interpretation And The Balance Of Power In The Administrative State, Cynthia Farina
Statutory Interpretation And The Balance Of Power In The Administrative State, Cynthia Farina
Cynthia R. Farina
The Last Should Be First—Flip The Order Of The Chevron Two-Step, Richard Murphy
The Last Should Be First—Flip The Order Of The Chevron Two-Step, Richard Murphy
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Chevron And The Legitimacy Of "Expert" Public Administration, Sidney Shapiro, Elizabeth Fisher
Chevron And The Legitimacy Of "Expert" Public Administration, Sidney Shapiro, Elizabeth Fisher
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Paternalistic Discrimination: The Chevron Deference Misplaced In Chevron U.S.A., Inc. V. Echazabal, Tricia M. Patterson
Paternalistic Discrimination: The Chevron Deference Misplaced In Chevron U.S.A., Inc. V. Echazabal, Tricia M. Patterson
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Chevron's Consensus, Evan J. Criddle
Chevron Deference And Treaty Interpretation, Evan J. Criddle
Chevron Deference And Treaty Interpretation, Evan J. Criddle
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Respecting Deference: Conceptualizing Skidmore Within The Architecture Of Chevron, Jim Rossi
Respecting Deference: Conceptualizing Skidmore Within The Architecture Of Chevron, Jim Rossi
William & Mary Law Review
This Article addresses critically the implications of the U.S. Supreme Court's recent decision in Christensen v. Harris County, 120 S. Ct. 1655 (2000), for standards of judicial review of agency interpretations of law. Christensen is a notable case in the administrative law area because it purports to clarify application of the deference doctrine first articulated in Skidmore v. Swift & Co., 323 U.S. 134 (1944). By reviving this doctrine, Christensen narrows application of the predominant approach to deference articulated in Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984), thus reducing the level of deference in …
Respecting Deference: Conceptualizing Skidmore Within The Architecture Of Chevron, Jim Rossi
Respecting Deference: Conceptualizing Skidmore Within The Architecture Of Chevron, Jim Rossi
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
This Article addresses critically the implications of the U.S. Supreme Court's recent decision in Christensen v. Harris County, 120 S.Ct. 1655 (2000), for standards of judicial review of agency interpretations of law. Christensen is a notable case in the administrative law area because it purports to clarify application of the deference doctrine first articulated in Skidmore v. Swift & Co., 323 U.S. 134 (1944). By reviving this doctrine, the case narrows application of the predominant approach to deference articulated in Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984), thus reducing the level of deference in …
Once More Unto The Breach: Reconciling Chevron Analysis And De Novo Judicial Review After United States V. Haggar Apparel Company , Claire R. Kelly, Patrick C. Reed
Once More Unto The Breach: Reconciling Chevron Analysis And De Novo Judicial Review After United States V. Haggar Apparel Company , Claire R. Kelly, Patrick C. Reed
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Statutory Interpretation And The Balance Of Power In The Administrative State, Cynthia R. Farina
Statutory Interpretation And The Balance Of Power In The Administrative State, Cynthia R. Farina
Cornell Law Faculty Publications