Law Commons^™

Equality And The European Union, Elizabeth F. Defeis

Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law

No abstract provided.

Life After Adarand: What Happened To The Metro Broadcasting Diversity Rationale For Affirmative Action In Telecommunications Ownership?, Leonard M. Baynes

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

The United States Supreme Court severely restricted affirmative action policies in Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena. In this opinion, a majority of the Court held that all state or federally mandated affirmative action programs are to be analyzed under strict scrutiny. This test requires affirmative action programs to meet a compelling governmental interest and be narrowly tailored.

Adarand raised issues concerning the validity of the Federal Communications Commission's affirmative action ownership policies. Previously, the Court in Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. FCC found the FCC minority ownership policies constitutional under a lower (intermediate) standard of review. In Adarand, the Court …

Bills And Notes -- 1957 Tennessee Survey, Paul J. Hartman

Vanderbilt Law Review

Since usury constitutes a defect in title under section 59 of the Negotiable Instruments Law, which defect apparently will be purged under the Tennessee law if the note gets into the hands of a holder in due course, there arises some questions as to the burden of proof in connection with establishing whether the holder is a holder in due course--Braswell v. Tindall is somewhat unusual in that the maker of the note is seeking by his affirmative action, as plaintiff, to dislodge the defendant-holder from his position as a holder in due course so that the defect in title …