Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Environmental Sciences (11)
- Physical Sciences and Mathematics (11)
- Water Resource Management (11)
- International Law (9)
- Natural Resources Management and Policy (9)
-
- Water Law (9)
- Natural Resources and Conservation (8)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (7)
- Environmental Policy (6)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (6)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (5)
- Constitutional Law (5)
- Natural Resources Law (5)
- Environmental Law (4)
- Oil, Gas, and Energy (4)
- Transnational Law (4)
- Civil and Environmental Engineering (3)
- Communications Law (3)
- Engineering (3)
- Geotechnical Engineering (3)
- Hydraulic Engineering (3)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (3)
- Law and Philosophy (3)
- Law and Politics (3)
- Natural Resource Economics (3)
- Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law (3)
- State and Local Government Law (3)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (2)
- Earth Sciences (2)
- Institution
-
- University of Colorado Law School (11)
- University of Miami Law School (5)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (4)
- Duquesne University (3)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (3)
-
- St. Mary's University (2)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (1)
- Georgetown University Law Center (1)
- Marquette University Law School (1)
- Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University (1)
- Notre Dame Law School (1)
- Old Dominion University (1)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (1)
- Santa Clara Law (1)
- University of Georgia School of Law (1)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (1)
- Publication
-
- Allocating and Managing Water for a Sustainable Future: Lessons from Around the World (Summer Conference, June 11-14) (6)
- University of Miami International and Comparative Law Review (5)
- Coalbed Methane Development in the Intermountain West (April 4-5) (3)
- Federal Communications Law Journal (3)
- Ledewitz Papers (3)
-
- Saint Louis University Law Journal (3)
- Faculty Articles (2)
- Scholarly Works (2)
- Books, Reports, and Studies (1)
- Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law (1)
- Faculty Publications (1)
- Hofstra Law Review (1)
- Journal Articles (1)
- Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review (1)
- Osgoode Hall Law Journal (1)
- Resource Law Notes: The Newsletter of the Natural Resources Law Center (1984-2002) (1)
- Saint Louis University Public Law Review (1)
- Sociology & Criminal Justice Theses & Dissertations (1)
- Testimony Before Congress (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 38 of 38
Full-Text Articles in Law
Resource Law Notes Newsletter, No. 53, Winter, Feb. 2002, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center
Resource Law Notes Newsletter, No. 53, Winter, Feb. 2002, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center
Resource Law Notes: The Newsletter of the Natural Resources Law Center (1984-2002)
No abstract provided.
Expanding State Jurisdiction To Regulate Out-Of-State Lawyers, Charles W. Wolfram
Expanding State Jurisdiction To Regulate Out-Of-State Lawyers, Charles W. Wolfram
Hofstra Law Review
No abstract provided.
The United States Of America And The International Criminal Court, Diane Marie Amann, M.N.S. Sellers
The United States Of America And The International Criminal Court, Diane Marie Amann, M.N.S. Sellers
Scholarly Works
The United States of America has not ratified the treaty establishing a permanent international criminal court, and it is highly un-likely to do so. This is not simply a question of delay caused by cumbersome ratification procedures; rather, it reflects deep-seated opposition by the U.S. executive branch and by many members of Congress. The United States voted against the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court when it was adopted on July 17, 1998, at the U.N. Diplomatic Conference of Plenipotentiaries. President William J. Clinton approved signature of the statute on the last day that a state, by signing, could …
Legal And Policy Implications For A New Era: The War On Terror, Jeffrey F. Addicott
Legal And Policy Implications For A New Era: The War On Terror, Jeffrey F. Addicott
Faculty Articles
The attacks on September 11, 2001 marked the beginning of the War on Terror. A conclusive body of evidence pointed directly to al-Qa’eda’s terrorist organization as the perpetrators of the arrack and to Afghanistan’s Taliban as the State-supporter of the terrorist organization. Al-Qa’eda terrorists use religion, most often radical Islamic fundamentalism, to justify the mass murder of innocent individuals–demonstrating they have no regard for human life, let alone the human rights and fundamental freedoms of others. Armed with the Congressional Joint Resolution, United Nations (“U.N.”) Resolution 1368, and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (“NATO”) Resolution, the United States and its …
One View To Add To The Many, Bill Piatt
One View To Add To The Many, Bill Piatt
Faculty Articles
The United States offers its citizens the opportunity to participate in the legal and political system through which it governs. The Constitution ensures that its citizens may engage, participate, and represent the body politics in government and the application of its laws. The recent attacks on America and the failure of the immigration system in monitoring its applicants has resulted in more restrictive immigration laws and policy.
The country’s legal education system must continue to improve its efforts in diversifying the nation’s law schools. More minorities should be represented as students, professors, and deans. Accomplishing a more diversified legal education …
Is The U.S. Out On A Limb? Comparing The U.S. Approach To Mandatory Consumer And Employment Arbitration To That Of The Rest Of The World, Jean R. Sternlight
Is The U.S. Out On A Limb? Comparing The U.S. Approach To Mandatory Consumer And Employment Arbitration To That Of The Rest Of The World, Jean R. Sternlight
Scholarly Works
After quickly summarizing the landscape of mandatory arbitration both within and without the United States, this article will consider why mandatory arbitration is treated so disparately, whether it is problematic that approaches to mandatory arbitration are so varied among countries, and what the differing jurisdictions can and should learn from one another. The article concludes that the United States Congress should be very concerned with the fact that we are treating mandatory arbitration more permissively than other countries. I, along with many others, have previously presented many arguments for why mandatory arbitration is problematic. Our outlier status on this issue …
International Remedies In National Criminal Cases: Icj Judgment In Germany V. United States, Douglass Cassel
International Remedies In National Criminal Cases: Icj Judgment In Germany V. United States, Douglass Cassel
Journal Articles
In Germany v. United States (2001), the International Court of Justice ruled that the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations confers judicially enforceable rights on foreign nationals detained for prolonged periods or sentenced to severe penalties without notice of their right to communicate with their consulates. The Court also ruled that states which fail to give timely notice cannot later invoke procedural default to bar individuals from judicial relief. However, the Court did not clearly address other issues, such as requiring individuals to show prejudice to the outcome of the trial, or denial of certain remedies for Convention violations, which may …
Looking A Gift Horse In The Mouth: Is The Committment Of The United States' New Allies Sincere, Frank Biggio
Looking A Gift Horse In The Mouth: Is The Committment Of The United States' New Allies Sincere, Frank Biggio
Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law
No abstract provided.