Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (31)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (16)
- Supreme Court of the United States (15)
- Business Organizations Law (14)
- Tax Law (13)
-
- Environmental Law (10)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (9)
- Fourteenth Amendment (8)
- Labor and Employment Law (8)
- Water Law (7)
- Criminal Procedure (6)
- Evidence (6)
- First Amendment (6)
- Courts (5)
- Criminal Law (5)
- Family Law (5)
- Land Use Law (5)
- Property Law and Real Estate (5)
- Taxation-Federal Estate and Gift (5)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (4)
- Bankruptcy Law (4)
- American Politics (3)
- Common Law (3)
- Economics (3)
- Election Law (3)
- International Law (3)
- Judges (3)
- Law and Economics (3)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (3)
- Keyword
-
- United States Supreme Court (13)
- Due Process of Law (10)
- Constitutional Interpretation (9)
- United States Constitution 14th Amendment (8)
- Economic Liberty and 1937 (7)
-
- Institute of Bill of Rights Symposium: Fidelty (7)
- Law (7)
- Clean Water Act of 1977 (6)
- Constitutional History (6)
- Constitutional Law (6)
- Employment Discrimination (6)
- Internal Revenue Service (6)
- Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e) (5)
- Evidence (5)
- Tax Planning (5)
- United States v. Smithfield Foods (5)
- Water Quality (5)
- Inc. (4)
- Antitrust Law (4)
- Book review (4)
- Criminal Procedure (4)
- Ethics (4)
- Federalism (4)
- Institute of Bill of Rights Symposium: Reconstructing Liberalism (4)
- Sexual Harassment (4)
- Tax Accounting (4)
- Acquisitions and Mergers (3)
- Beliefs (3)
- Civil Rights (3)
- Common Law (3)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 60 of 157
Full-Text Articles in Law
Lost Fidelities, Barry Cushman
Constitutional Law -- Due Process Clause -- Third Circuit Holds That $50 Million Punitive Damages Award In Context Of A $48 Million Compensatory Award Is Unconstitutionally Excessive -- Inter Medical Supplies, Ltd. V. Ebi Medical Systems, Inc., 181 F.3d 446 (3d Cir. 1999)., A. Benjamin Spencer
Faculty Publications
In 1996, the Supreme Court, in BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore, struck down a punitive damages award on the ground that it was "grossly excessive" in violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment . Since BMW, many courts have faced the challenge of applying its principles to determine whether punitive damages awards surpass the constitutional limit. Last June, in Inter Medical Supplies, Ltd. v. EBI Medical Systems, Inc., the Third Circuit faced this difficulty when it considered whether a $50 million punitive damages award, granted in conjunction with a $48 million compensatory damages award, was …
Power, Policy, And The Hyde Amendment: Ensuring Sound Judicial Interpretation Of The Criminal Attorney's Fees Law, Lawrence Judson Welle
Power, Policy, And The Hyde Amendment: Ensuring Sound Judicial Interpretation Of The Criminal Attorney's Fees Law, Lawrence Judson Welle
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
America's Uneasy Relationship With The Working Poor, A. Mechele Dickerson
America's Uneasy Relationship With The Working Poor, A. Mechele Dickerson
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Legal Protection Of Design Work, David E. Boelzner
Legal Protection Of Design Work, David E. Boelzner
Popular Media
No abstract provided.
Neonaticide And The Misuse Of The Insanity Defense, Megan C. Hogan
Neonaticide And The Misuse Of The Insanity Defense, Megan C. Hogan
William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Some Unconventional Thoughts On Sprawl, Mark Fina, Leonard Shabman
Some Unconventional Thoughts On Sprawl, Mark Fina, Leonard Shabman
William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review
No abstract provided.
Eight Principles For Property Rights In The Anti-Sprawl Age, Eric T. Freyfogle
Eight Principles For Property Rights In The Anti-Sprawl Age, Eric T. Freyfogle
William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review
No abstract provided.
Un-Neighborly Conduct: Why Can't Virginia Beach And North Carolina Be Friends?, Paul Schmidt
Un-Neighborly Conduct: Why Can't Virginia Beach And North Carolina Be Friends?, Paul Schmidt
William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review
No abstract provided.
Reinventing Growth Management For The 21st Century, Douglas R. Porter
Reinventing Growth Management For The 21st Century, Douglas R. Porter
William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review
No abstract provided.
Managing Space To Manage Growth, Daniel R. Mandelker
Managing Space To Manage Growth, Daniel R. Mandelker
William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review
No abstract provided.
"Hybrid" Farmland Protection Programs: A New Paradigm For Growth Management, Edward Thompson Jr
"Hybrid" Farmland Protection Programs: A New Paradigm For Growth Management, Edward Thompson Jr
William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review
No abstract provided.
Tea-21: Paving Over Efforts To Stem Urban Sprawl And Reduce America's Dependence On The Automobile, Liam A. Mccann
Tea-21: Paving Over Efforts To Stem Urban Sprawl And Reduce America's Dependence On The Automobile, Liam A. Mccann
William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review
No abstract provided.
Teaching The Retrenchment Generation: When Sapphire Meets Socrates At The Intersection Of Race, Gender, And Authority, Pamela J. Smith
Teaching The Retrenchment Generation: When Sapphire Meets Socrates At The Intersection Of Race, Gender, And Authority, Pamela J. Smith
William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice
This Article is about perceptions and the negative sociological factors that feed these perceptions as Black women attempt to teach the Retrenchment Generation. For purposes of this Article, the Retrenchment Generation is not limited to any particular age group or period of time. Rather, the Retrenchment Generation refers to a state of mind that makes race-based, sex-based, and race/sex-based microaggressions acceptable and in fact normal. The Retrenchment Generation is defined by the synergism that is created by racial isolation, particularly in the educational arena, retrenchment fervor, and the presumption of incompetence that inflexibly presumes that all professional Black women are …
Admitting Expert Testimony On Battered Woman Syndrome In Virginia Courts: How Peeples Changed Virginia Self-Defense Law, Marybeth H. Lenkevich
Admitting Expert Testimony On Battered Woman Syndrome In Virginia Courts: How Peeples Changed Virginia Self-Defense Law, Marybeth H. Lenkevich
William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice
No abstract provided.
The Tragic And Chaotic Aftermath Of A Baby Switch: Should Policy And Common Law, Blood Ties, Or Psychological Bonds Prevail, Cynthia R. Mabry
The Tragic And Chaotic Aftermath Of A Baby Switch: Should Policy And Common Law, Blood Ties, Or Psychological Bonds Prevail, Cynthia R. Mabry
William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Unique Mental Health Needs Of Hiv-Infected Women Inmates: What Services Are Required Under The Constitution And The Americans With Disabilities Act?, Connie M. Mayer
Unique Mental Health Needs Of Hiv-Infected Women Inmates: What Services Are Required Under The Constitution And The Americans With Disabilities Act?, Connie M. Mayer
William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Delaware's Capital Jury Selection: Inadequate Voir Dire And The Problem Of Automatic Death Penalty Jurors, Adam M. Gershowitz
Delaware's Capital Jury Selection: Inadequate Voir Dire And The Problem Of Automatic Death Penalty Jurors, Adam M. Gershowitz
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Children's Interests In A Family Context - A Cautionary Note, James G. Dwyer
Children's Interests In A Family Context - A Cautionary Note, James G. Dwyer
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Regulation Of Franchisor Opportunism And Production Of The Institutional Framework: Federal Monopoly Or Competition Between The States?, Alan J. Meese
Regulation Of Franchisor Opportunism And Production Of The Institutional Framework: Federal Monopoly Or Competition Between The States?, Alan J. Meese
Faculty Publications
Most scholars would agree that a merger between General Motors and Ford should not be judged solely by Delaware corporate law, even if both firms are incorporated in Delaware. Leaving the standards governing such mergers to state law would assuredly produce a race to the bottom that would result in unduly permissive treatment of such transactions. Similarly, if the two firms agreed to divide markets, most would agree that some regulatory authority other than Michigan or Delaware should have the final word on the agreement. Thus, in order to forestall monopoly or its equivalent, the national government must itself exercise …
Negotiated Development Denial Meets People's Court: Del Monte Dunes Brings New Wildcards To Exactions Law, Jonathan M. Davidson, Ronald H. Rosenberg, Michael C. Spata
Negotiated Development Denial Meets People's Court: Del Monte Dunes Brings New Wildcards To Exactions Law, Jonathan M. Davidson, Ronald H. Rosenberg, Michael C. Spata
Faculty Publications
The United States Supreme Court Answered "YES" to the $1.45 million over exaction question for 1999. In City of Monterey v. Del Monte Dunes at Monterey Ltd., a unanimous court extended the scope of compensatory takings review beyond land dedication conditions into the realm of regulatory denial. Justice Kennedy's opinion vitalized the "legitimate state interests" test from Agins v. City of Tiburon to sustain an inverse condemnation conclusion and damage award to the frustrated developer. A majority of the court also concurred that the trial court may delegate this takings conclusion to the jury under federal civil rights law. The …
Unreviewability In State Administrative Law, Charles H. Koch Jr.
Unreviewability In State Administrative Law, Charles H. Koch Jr.
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Section 10: Justice Blackmun, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 10: Justice Blackmun, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 1: Mitchell V. Helms, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 1: Mitchell V. Helms, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 3: Business And Commerce, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 3: Business And Commerce, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 7: Criminal Law And Procedure, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 7: Criminal Law And Procedure, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 8: Upcoming Issues Before The Court, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 8: Upcoming Issues Before The Court, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 4: Federalism, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 4: Federalism, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 11: Toni House, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 11: Toni House, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 2: The Direction Of The Court, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 2: The Direction Of The Court, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.