Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- International Law (8)
- Jurisdiction (8)
- Communications Law (4)
- Courts (4)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (3)
-
- Constitutional Law (3)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (3)
- Legislation (3)
- Civil Law (2)
- Contracts (2)
- Human Rights Law (2)
- Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law (2)
- Intellectual Property Law (2)
- Judges (2)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (2)
- American Politics (1)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Common Law (1)
- Comparative Politics (1)
- Computer Law (1)
- Conflict of Laws (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Criminal Procedure (1)
- Environmental Law (1)
- Family Law (1)
- International Humanitarian Law (1)
- International Relations (1)
- International Trade Law (1)
- Institution
-
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (6)
- University of South Carolina (3)
- Selected Works (2)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (2)
- U.S. Naval War College (2)
-
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Duke Law (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Louisiana State University Law Center (1)
- Marquette University Law School (1)
- New York Law School (1)
- Nova Southeastern University (1)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (1)
- University of Colorado Law School (1)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (1)
- University of Richmond (1)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (1)
- William & Mary Law School (1)
- Publication
-
- Federal Communications Law Journal (3)
- South Carolina Law Review (3)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (2)
- International Law Studies (2)
- Scholarly Works (2)
-
- Touro Law Review (2)
- American Indian Law Review (1)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (1)
- Daniel B. Bogart (1)
- Donald J. Kochan (1)
- Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Fordham Law Review (1)
- ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law (1)
- Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies (1)
- Innis Christie Collection (1)
- Jepson School of Leadership Studies articles, book chapters and other publications (1)
- Louisiana Law Review (1)
- Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review (1)
- Media Law and Policy (1)
- Publications (1)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 30
Full-Text Articles in Law
Re Coca-Cola Bottling Ltd And Retail, Wholesale And Department Store Union, Local 1065 (Colpitts), Innis Christie
Re Coca-Cola Bottling Ltd And Retail, Wholesale And Department Store Union, Local 1065 (Colpitts), Innis Christie
Innis Christie Collection
Employee grievance alleging breach of the Collective Agreement between the parties dated July 3, 1997, which the parties agreed is the Collective Agreement that governs this matter, and in particular of Article 9:03(d), in that the Employer denied the Grievor Long-Term Disability benefits. The Grievance requested "full redress".
Another Look At European Internet Law, Alain Gardrat
Another Look At European Internet Law, Alain Gardrat
Media Law and Policy
No abstract provided.
The Universality Principle And War Crimes, Yoram Dinstein
The Universality Principle And War Crimes, Yoram Dinstein
International Law Studies
No abstract provided.
The Development Of International Law With Respect To The Law Enforcement Roles Of Navies And Coast Guards In Peacetime, Ivan Shearer
The Development Of International Law With Respect To The Law Enforcement Roles Of Navies And Coast Guards In Peacetime, Ivan Shearer
International Law Studies
No abstract provided.
Personal Jurisdiction In Cyberspace: Something More Is Required On The Electronic Stream Of Commerce, Howard B. Stravitz
Personal Jurisdiction In Cyberspace: Something More Is Required On The Electronic Stream Of Commerce, Howard B. Stravitz
South Carolina Law Review
No abstract provided.
Transnational Insolvency Dilemma: Congress Should Emphasize Comity Of Nations, James Garrett Van Osdell
Transnational Insolvency Dilemma: Congress Should Emphasize Comity Of Nations, James Garrett Van Osdell
South Carolina Law Review
No abstract provided.
Section 332 Of The Communications Act Of 1934: A Federal Regulatory Framework That Is "Hog Tight, Horse High, And Bull Strong", Leonard J. Kennedy, Heather A. Purcell
Section 332 Of The Communications Act Of 1934: A Federal Regulatory Framework That Is "Hog Tight, Horse High, And Bull Strong", Leonard J. Kennedy, Heather A. Purcell
Federal Communications Law Journal
In 1993, recognizing that state and local regulatory practices were harmful to the development of widespread low-cost commercial and personal mobile radio services, the U.S. Congress passed, and President Clinton signed, legislation that freed wireless carriers from a dual federal-state regulatory structure. As a result, sections 332 and 2(b) of the Communications Act were revised to endow the FCC with exclusive jurisdiction over wireless regulation. Unfortunately, some courts and regulators have concluded that Congress did not intend to grant the FCC exclusive authority over wireless communications. Such rulings could be attributed to a misguided focus on traditional preemption analysis rather …
Allowing Fda Regulation Of Communications Software Used In Telemedicine: A Potentially Fatal Misdiagnosis?, Ann K. Schooley
Allowing Fda Regulation Of Communications Software Used In Telemedicine: A Potentially Fatal Misdiagnosis?, Ann K. Schooley
Federal Communications Law Journal
Communications technology is changing and improving the way that health care services are delivered to patients. Telemedicine, or the use of communications technology to provide medical care, allows doctors to treat patients in rural areas who otherwise would not have access to medical services. With the development and use of telemedicine, however, comes the burden of government regulation. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is just beginning to assert its jurisdiction over telemedicine, seeking to regulate telemedicine systems as medical devices under 21 U.S.C. § 321(h). Should the FDA strongly assert its jurisdiction, it has the ability to regulate entire …
Cyberspace, Sovereignty, Jurisdiction, And Modernism, Joel Trachtman
Cyberspace, Sovereignty, Jurisdiction, And Modernism, Joel Trachtman
Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies
No abstract provided.
John Marshall And The Rule Of Law, John V. Orth
John Marshall And The Rule Of Law, John V. Orth
South Carolina Law Review
No abstract provided.
From Patchwork To Network: Strategies For International Intellectual Property In Flux, Paul E. Geller
From Patchwork To Network: Strategies For International Intellectual Property In Flux, Paul E. Geller
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
Laws of intellectual property define what is bought and sold on media and technology markets, notably works, trademarks, and inventions. Laws and treaties have traditionally been made and enforced by nation-states operating in a patchwork of territories. Now, the media and technology marketplace is being globalized in digital networks. The law is only beginning to respond to this change.
To analyze this process in the field of intellectual property, this Article will consider the following questions: First, how is the patchwork of national laws lagging behind new networks in this field? Second, how does the international regime of intellectual property …
Balancing The Scales: The 1996 Telecommunications Act And Eleventh Amendment Immunity, Cynthia L. Bauerly
Balancing The Scales: The 1996 Telecommunications Act And Eleventh Amendment Immunity, Cynthia L. Bauerly
Federal Communications Law Journal
The Telecommunications Act of 1996 explicitly created a role for federal courts in the interconnection process. However, parties' ability to seek federal review of interconnection agreements is no longer as straightforward as the language of the Act implies. The Supreme Court's unnecessarily novel and narrow reading of Eleventh Amendment immunity in Seminole Tribe v. Florida renders unenforceable the federal review provisions of the Act against state regulatory commissions. While some interconnection agreements may find their way into federal court, for example, where a party seeking to interconnect sues an incumbent provider instead of the state commission, enforcement of a federal …
Comparativist Ruminations From The Bayou On Child Custody Jurisdiction: The Uccja, The Pkpa, And The Hague Convention On Child Abduction, Christopher L. Blakesley
Comparativist Ruminations From The Bayou On Child Custody Jurisdiction: The Uccja, The Pkpa, And The Hague Convention On Child Abduction, Christopher L. Blakesley
Louisiana Law Review
No abstract provided.
Jurisdiction And Evidence - An English Perspective, Steven Loble
Jurisdiction And Evidence - An English Perspective, Steven Loble
ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law
The countries of Europe have entered into multilateral treaties to facilitate doing business in Europe. These treaties cover jurisdiction, enforcement of foreign judgments and choice of law. The individual states in the United States have analogous arrangements to facilitate doing business within the United States.
Trademark Harmonization: Norms, Names & Nonsense, Kenneth L. Port
Trademark Harmonization: Norms, Names & Nonsense, Kenneth L. Port
Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review
Professor Port provides a comment on Marshall A. Leaffer's article that offers another viewpoint on the important issue of the globalization process and trademark law. Rather than seeking ideals of international trademark laws through harmonization, Professor Port suggests that a better objective is internationalization. Professor Port explains that harmonization of international trademark law will be impossible as long as world communities adhere to territorial justifications for sovereignty and jurisdiction. Because goods flow in the reality of an international market, Professor Port reasons that initiatives to avoid inefficiencies and uncertainties of global trademark laws should be directed toward internationalization.
The Ultimate Matrimonial Motion Practice Primer, Joel R. Brandes, Bari B. Brandes
The Ultimate Matrimonial Motion Practice Primer, Joel R. Brandes, Bari B. Brandes
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Phoenix And The Perils Of The Second Best: Why Heightened Appellate Deference To Tax Court Decisions Is Undesirable, Steve R. Johnson
The Phoenix And The Perils Of The Second Best: Why Heightened Appellate Deference To Tax Court Decisions Is Undesirable, Steve R. Johnson
Articles by Maurer Faculty
In our judicial structure, both courts of general jurisdiction and specialized courts are empowered to adjudicate federal income tax controversies. A proper relationship among those courts has proved difficult to forge and maintain. Absent an enduring intellectual and political consensus, institutional arrangements have been subject to recurring question and challenge.
Prosecutorial Readiness, Speedy Trial And The Absent Defendant: Has New York's 25 Year Dilemma Finally Been Resolved, Abraham Abramovsky, Jonathan I. Edelstein
Prosecutorial Readiness, Speedy Trial And The Absent Defendant: Has New York's 25 Year Dilemma Finally Been Resolved, Abraham Abramovsky, Jonathan I. Edelstein
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Statutory Interpretation Of Federal Jurisdictional Statutes: Jurisdiction Of The Private Right Of Action Under The Tcpa, Fabian D. Gonell
Statutory Interpretation Of Federal Jurisdictional Statutes: Jurisdiction Of The Private Right Of Action Under The Tcpa, Fabian D. Gonell
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
Should Unclos Or Gatt/Wto Decide Trade And Environment Disputes?, Lakshman D. Guruswamy
Should Unclos Or Gatt/Wto Decide Trade And Environment Disputes?, Lakshman D. Guruswamy
Publications
No abstract provided.
Forum Shopping For Arbitration Decisions: Federal Courts' Use Of Antisuit Injunctions Against State Courts, Jean R. Sternlight
Forum Shopping For Arbitration Decisions: Federal Courts' Use Of Antisuit Injunctions Against State Courts, Jean R. Sternlight
Scholarly Works
Arbitration clauses, which are supposed to do away with litigation, have ironically spawned many complicated and expensive court fights. Some of the most complex cases involve both forum shopping by the parties and jurisdictional turf battles between federal and state courts. Federal courts have, on quite a few occasions, actually gone so far as to enjoin a state court from continuing to consider a pending case because the federal court concluded that the matter ought to be arbitrated. The Supreme Court, however, has never ruled on whether or when such "arbitral antisuit injunctions" are permissible. In Moses H. Cone Memorial …
La Preuve Pénale Et Des Tests Génétiques: United States Report, Christopher L. Blakesley
La Preuve Pénale Et Des Tests Génétiques: United States Report, Christopher L. Blakesley
Scholarly Works
A major problem for those analyzing U.S. criminal law and procedure is that it does not fit the Continental or British mold. There is no one single system, but parallel federal and 50 state systems each with its own legislature, laws, courts (including trial, appellate, and supreme courts), police, prosecutors and prisons. The authorities who enact and implement these laws are sovereign within their respective jurisdictions. Each state has police power over its people. The 10th amendment to the U.S. Constitution controls allocation of federal and state authority. It provides that whatever the Constitution has not designated as being within …
Interlocutory Appeals From Orders Denying Qualified Immunity: Determining The Proper Scope Of Appellate Jurisdiction, Kathryn R. Urbonya
Interlocutory Appeals From Orders Denying Qualified Immunity: Determining The Proper Scope Of Appellate Jurisdiction, Kathryn R. Urbonya
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Tribal-State Affairs: American States As 'Disclaiming' Sovereigns, David E. Wilkins
Tribal-State Affairs: American States As 'Disclaiming' Sovereigns, David E. Wilkins
Jepson School of Leadership Studies articles, book chapters and other publications
The history of tribal-state political relations has been contentious from the beginning of the republic. As a result of these tensions, the relationship of tribal nations and the federal government was federalized when the U.S. Constitution was ratified in 1788. Thus, a number of states, especially in the West, were required in their organic acts and constitutions to forever disclaim jurisdiction over Indian property and persons. This article analyzes these disclaimer clauses, explains the factors that have enabled the states to assume some jurisdictional presence in Indian Country, examines the key issues in which disclaimers continue to carry significant weight, …
Comparative Law In Action: Promissory Estoppel, The Civil Law, And The Mixed Jurisdiction, David V. Snyder
Comparative Law In Action: Promissory Estoppel, The Civil Law, And The Mixed Jurisdiction, David V. Snyder
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Comparative Law In Action: Promissory Estoppel, The Civil Law, And The Mixed Jurisdiction, David Snyder
Comparative Law In Action: Promissory Estoppel, The Civil Law, And The Mixed Jurisdiction, David Snyder
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
No abstract provided.
The ‘Charming Betsy’ Canon And Separation Of Powers: Rethinking The Interpretive Role Of International Law, Curtis A. Bradley
The ‘Charming Betsy’ Canon And Separation Of Powers: Rethinking The Interpretive Role Of International Law, Curtis A. Bradley
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Unexpected Gifts Of Chapter 11: The Breach Of A Director's Duty Of Loyalty Following Plan Confirmation And The Postconfirmation Jurisdiction Of Bankruptcy Courts, Daniel Bogart
Daniel B. Bogart
This article addresses the intersection of two aspects of chapter 11 jurisprudence: the fiduciary duties of directors and officers of the debtor and the post confirmation jurisdiction of bankruptcy courts. The article suggests that the normal application of fiduciary duties to confirmed debtors creates particular opportunities for directors and officers to act in a disloyal manner. The article examines two cases in particular. These include Bernstein v. Donaldson (In re Insulfoams, Inc.) and Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. Hasenotes (In re Cumberland Farms, Inc.) Traditionally, courts and commentators suggest that normal state fiduciary standards govern directors post confirmation. The article argues, …
Constitutional Structure As A Limitation On The Scope Of The "Law Of Nations" In The Alien Tort Claims Act, Donald J. Kochan
Constitutional Structure As A Limitation On The Scope Of The "Law Of Nations" In The Alien Tort Claims Act, Donald J. Kochan
Donald J. Kochan
Jurisdiction matters. Outside of the set of jurisdictional constraints, the judiciary is at sea; it poses a threat to the separation of powers and risks becoming a dangerous and domineering branch. Jurisdictional limitations serve a particularly important function when the judiciary is dealing with issues of international law. Since much of international law concerns foreign relations, the province of the executive and, in part, the legislature, the danger that the judiciary will act in a policy-making role or will frustrate the functions of the political branches is especially great. The Framers of the Constitution were particularly concerned with constructing a …