Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Institution
-
- Selected Works (6)
- University of South Carolina (4)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (3)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (3)
- University of North Carolina School of Law (3)
-
- William & Mary Law School (3)
- SelectedWorks (2)
- West Virginia University (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- Seattle University School of Law (1)
- University of Georgia School of Law (1)
- University of Washington School of Law (1)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (1)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (1)
- Publication
-
- Faculty Publications (6)
- South Carolina Law Review (4)
- All Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Articles (1)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (1)
-
- Congressional Testimony (1)
- D. A. Jeremy Telman (1)
- Faculty Articles (1)
- Harold J. Krent (1)
- Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies (1)
- Ivo Teixeira Gico Jr. (1)
- Jill E. Family (1)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Lawrence Rosenthal (1)
- Michael Anthony Lawrence (1)
- Scholarly Works (1)
- Seattle University Law Review (1)
- Steven J. Heyman (1)
- Susan Raeker-Jordan (1)
- Villanova Law Review (1)
- West Virginia Law Review (1)
- William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review (1)
- William & Mary Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 33 of 33
Full-Text Articles in Law
Permissible Content Discrimination Under The First Amendment: The Strange Case Of The Public Employee, Lawrence Rosenthal
Permissible Content Discrimination Under The First Amendment: The Strange Case Of The Public Employee, Lawrence Rosenthal
Lawrence Rosenthal
The speech of public employees poses special problems under the First Amendment. As Justice O'Connor once explained, a rule that forbids employees who deal with the public from being rude to customers should be permissible in the public sector, even though a statute containing the very same prohibition would be considered impermissibly vague when applied to private-sector employees. Recognizing that a special rule for public employees is necessary, the Supreme Court has held that only when public employees speak on a matter of public concern does their speech qualify for constitutional protection, and even then, the employee's interest must be …
Developments In State Constitutional Law: Due Process, Jill E. Family
Developments In State Constitutional Law: Due Process, Jill E. Family
Jill E. Family
No abstract provided.
The Pre-Emption Presumption That Never Was: Pre-Emption Doctrine Swallows The Rule, Susan Raeker-Jordan
The Pre-Emption Presumption That Never Was: Pre-Emption Doctrine Swallows The Rule, Susan Raeker-Jordan
Susan Raeker-Jordan
No abstract provided.