Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- American Photocopy Equip. Co. v. Rovico (2)
- Federal Trade Commission Act (2)
- LaPeyre v. FTC (2)
- Allied occupation (1)
- American Cyanamid Co. v. FTC (1)
-
- Attorney fee (1)
- Automatic Radio Mfg. Co. v. Hazeltine Research Inc. (1)
- Bridotte v. Thys Co. (1)
- Business Organizations (1)
- Carl Zeiss Stiftung (1)
- Commissioner of Patents (1)
- Compensation (1)
- Competition (1)
- Copyright Law (1)
- Corporations (1)
- De facto (1)
- De jure government (1)
- Discriminatory Royalty Rates (1)
- Discriminatory royalty rate (1)
- Doctrine of recognition (1)
- English Court of Appeal (1)
- English Rule (1)
- Equity jurisdiction (1)
- Exorbitant Patent Royalties (1)
- Expert witness (1)
- Foreign patents (1)
- Germany (1)
- House of Lords (1)
- Inc. (1)
- Invention (1)
Articles 1 - 10 of 10
Full-Text Articles in Law
Jurisdiction--Foreign Patents--Jurisdiction Over Foreign Patent Claims, Michigan Law Review
Jurisdiction--Foreign Patents--Jurisdiction Over Foreign Patent Claims, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
The territorial limitations of sovereignty have been held to preclude a country from giving extraterritorial effect to its patent laws, and, therefore, a patent confers rights which are protected only within the boundaries of the issuing country. Thus, United States and foreign patents, even when granted for the same invention, create separate and distinct rights which may differ in scope and effect in the respective countries. Concomitantly, courts have also held that a foreign patent confers upon its owner no rights or protection with respect to acts done in the United States.
Kaplan: An Unhurried View Of Copyright, W. Brown Morton Jr.
Kaplan: An Unhurried View Of Copyright, W. Brown Morton Jr.
Michigan Law Review
A Review of An Unhurried View of Copyright by Benjamin Kaplan
The Misuse Doctrine And Post Expiration-Discriminatory-And Exorbitant Patent Royalties, Larry R. Fisher
The Misuse Doctrine And Post Expiration-Discriminatory-And Exorbitant Patent Royalties, Larry R. Fisher
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Antitrust-Patents-Licenses-Regulation Of Patent License Royalty Rates Under The Antitrust Laws, Michigan Law Review
Antitrust-Patents-Licenses-Regulation Of Patent License Royalty Rates Under The Antitrust Laws, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Neither the Constitution nor federal legislation defines a patentee's licensing rights; consequently, it has devolved upon the courts to control patent marketing practices. A patentee is entitled to a limited monopoly on his invention, and proper use of this grant is not a violation of any law regulating trade practices. Yet licensing affords an opportunity to enlarge the scope of this monopoly, and courts using various rationales have declared illegal different forms of patent licensing arrangements found to be outside the protective coverage of the patent grant. Until recently, however, the courts have not dealt with the problem of whether …
Community Antenna Television—A Copyright Infringer, Anon
Community Antenna Television—A Copyright Infringer, Anon
Washington Law Review
Plaintiff licensed its copyrighted motion pictures to a television broadcasting station. Defendant, a Community Antenna Television (CATV) System, received the station's broadcast, amplified the signal, and retransmitted it via coaxial cable to paying subscribers operating their own television sets in private homes and places of business. Plaintiff brought suit under the Copyright Act, alleging infringement on grounds that defendant had unlawfully performed plaintiff's copyrighted work. Held: Copyright protection of motion pictures extends to movies shown in private homes and places of business by means of CATV systems operated for profit. United Artists Television, Inc. v. Fortnightly Corp., 255 F. Supp. …
Community Antenna Television—A Copyright Infringer, Anon
Community Antenna Television—A Copyright Infringer, Anon
Washington Law Review
Plaintiff licensed its copyrighted motion pictures to a television broadcasting station. Defendant, a Community Antenna Television (CATV) System, received the station's broadcast, amplified the signal, and retransmitted it via coaxial cable to paying subscribers operating their own television sets in private homes and places of business. Plaintiff brought suit under the Copyright Act, alleging infringement on grounds that defendant had unlawfully performed plaintiff's copyrighted work. Held: Copyright protection of motion pictures extends to movies shown in private homes and places of business by means of CATV systems operated for profit. United Artists Television, Inc. v. Fortnightly Corp., 255 F. Supp. …
A Divided Country In Foreign Courts-Recent Litigation Involving Germany's Legal Status And The Zeiss Stiftung, Herbert L. Bernstein
A Divided Country In Foreign Courts-Recent Litigation Involving Germany's Legal Status And The Zeiss Stiftung, Herbert L. Bernstein
Michigan Law Review
The partition of countries in the wake of the second World War accounts for two Asian battlefields: Korea and Viet Nam. In Europe, where a dividing line was drawn through Germany, military hostilities have been avoided thus far. Instead, the controversies originating from that line are fought out at the conference table, through public and private media of communication, and in the courthouses.
Legal Basis For Precluding A Patent Examiner From Testifying
Legal Basis For Precluding A Patent Examiner From Testifying
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Taxation Of The Treasures Of The Sea, John J. Kenny, Ronald R. Hrusoff
Taxation Of The Treasures Of The Sea, John J. Kenny, Ronald R. Hrusoff
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
Trademarks-Successful Plaintiffs In Trademark Infringement Actions Under The Lanham Act May Not Recover Attorney's Fees-Maier Brewing Co. V. Fleischmann Distilling Corp., Michigan Law Review
Trademarks-Successful Plaintiffs In Trademark Infringement Actions Under The Lanham Act May Not Recover Attorney's Fees-Maier Brewing Co. V. Fleischmann Distilling Corp., Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
In an action for trademark infringement under the Lanham Act and for unfair competition, the District Court enjoined the defendant company from further use of the trademark and awarded the plaintiff $60,000 in attorney's fees. On appeal, held, reversed in part. The issuance of the injunction was upheld but the court declared that attorney's fees are not recoverable in trademark infringement cases prosecuted under the Lanham Act since Congress had not expressly provided for such awards.