Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

1932

University of Michigan Law School

Articles 241 - 253 of 253

Full-Text Articles in Law

Bills And Notes - Estoppel As Against Bona Fide Purchaser Of Non-Negotiable Chose Jan 1932

Bills And Notes - Estoppel As Against Bona Fide Purchaser Of Non-Negotiable Chose

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiffs bought some interim certificates (at that time non-negotiable in New York), and delivery was made to them. Because of inability to make payment that day, they asked the vendor to send a runner for the certificates, and when a person appeared asking for the amount due the vendor, plaintiffs' cashier gave him the certificates. Shortly thereafter the proper runner arrived, and plaintiff's at once gave notice of the theft in newspapers and otherwise. Some of the stolen certificates were pledged with defendant who acted in good faith in taking them. The defense to this suit for recovery of the …

Go to article

Bills And Notes - Restrictive Indorsement Jan 1932

Bills And Notes - Restrictive Indorsement

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff sued defendant to enforce the collection of two promissory notes which defendant indorsed in blank to X Bank. X Bank indorsed the notes to "Y Bank, as trustee." Y indorsed the notes to plaintiff. All the indorsements were before maturity and for value. Held, on the pleadings, that the order overruling the demurrer to the declaration be sustained. In a concurring opinion, Brown, J., stated that an indorsement to a corporation or person with the words, "as trustee," after the name is not a restrictive indorsement within the meaning of the Uniform Negotiable Instruments Law, sec. 6796, 7, …

Go to article

Conflict Of Laws - Remarriage After Divorce Jan 1932

Conflict Of Laws - Remarriage After Divorce

Michigan Law Review

H obtained a divorce in Alabama under a statute prohibiting remarriage without. permission of the court. He remarried in Tennessee, where the statute prohibited remarriage during the life of the other spouse. Held, the Tennessee law applied to divorces obtained in that state only. In the absence of express words. to that effect, the Alabama statute had no extra-territorial effect; and the marriage, valid where performed, was valid everywhere. Smith v. Goldsmith, (Ala. 1931) 134 So. 651. H secured a divorce in Vermont under a statute declaring void any remarriage within three years, either within or without the …

Go to article

Contracts - Illegality- General Restraint Of Trade Jan 1932

Contracts - Illegality- General Restraint Of Trade

Michigan Law Review

Defendants sold their stock in a manufacturing corporation with a covenant in the contract to the effect that they would not engage in the sale or manufacture of bunghole appliances in the United States, east of the Mississippi, for a period of sixteen years. Held, a contract which does not permit one to engage in his trade anywhere within the state is one in general restraint of trade and is ipso facto illegal and void. Parish et al. v. Schwartz et al. (Ill. 1931) 176 N.E. 757.

Go to article

Corporations - Service Of Process On A Subsidiary Corporation Doing Business In The State In An Action Against A Foreign Corporation Jan 1932

Corporations - Service Of Process On A Subsidiary Corporation Doing Business In The State In An Action Against A Foreign Corporation

Michigan Law Review

The Freeport Texas Company, a Delaware corporation, owned all of the stock of the Freeport Sulphur Company, a Texas corporation, except a few qualifying shares. The directorates of the two corporations were interlocking; officers of the parent corporation occupied identical positions in the subsidiary; and common offices were occupied in New York. It also appeared that the board of the Texas corporation only passed on local operating matters and ratified ordinary contracts. The sales end of the organization was operated from New York and the board had no control over it. The fixing and payment of salaries, the amount of …

Go to article

Equity - Estoppel By Injunction In Subsequent Suit At Law For Damages Jan 1932

Equity - Estoppel By Injunction In Subsequent Suit At Law For Damages

Michigan Law Review

A leased to B a shop to be used as a public market. The lease contained a restrictive covenant by the lessor to lease no other shops for a like purpose. The lessor, however, leased to C, who was engaged in the same business as B, one of the shops so restricted. C took with knowledge of the restrictive covenant in B's lease. B, the plaintiff in this action, secured a final injunction in a New York court enjoining the use by C. Under the New York statute B could have obtained damages under the equity decree, but failed to …

Go to article

Evidence - Burden Of Proof - Compliance With Stipulation In Bill Of Lading As To Time For Claim Of Loss Jan 1932

Evidence - Burden Of Proof - Compliance With Stipulation In Bill Of Lading As To Time For Claim Of Loss

Michigan Law Review

P purchased potatoes in Michigan. He instructed the defendant railroad to deliver the potatoes to the warehouse of B when they should arrive in Richmond. Instead, some were sent to another warehouse. Before P discovered the mistake, the potatoes had spoiled. P made claim of loss six months and twenty days after the shipment left Michigan. The bill of lading provided: "Sec. 2 (b). Claims for loss or damage . . . must be made in writing . . . within six months after a reasonable time for delivery has elapsed." The testimony of Neiss, freight clerk, who was called …

Go to article

Fixtures - Rights Of Conditional Vendors -Test Of Material Injury To Freehold Jan 1932

Fixtures - Rights Of Conditional Vendors -Test Of Material Injury To Freehold

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff sued to foreclose a mortgage on a hotel. Defendants were vendors of various pieces of hotel equipment, who apparently had filed title-retaining contracts subsequent to the recording of the realty mortgage. The court found that some of the equipment was not attached to the realty at all, and that the rest could be removed without material in jury to the "freehold." Held, that the title of the conditional vendors prevailed, under N. J. Comp. Stat. supp., secs. 182-93. Bank of America National Ass'n. v. LaReine Hotel Corp. (N. J. 1931) 156 Atl. 28.

Go to article

Municipal Corporations - Governmental Function - Liability For Nuisance Jan 1932

Municipal Corporations - Governmental Function - Liability For Nuisance

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff was injured at a municipal bathing beach as the result of a dive from a spring board into shallow water. Held, that while the city was not liable for the negligent performance of a governmental function, the jury would be justified in finding that the diving board, as erected, constituted a nuisance, and that the defendant city would be liable, on that ground, for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff. Hoffman v. City of Bristol, 113 Conn. 386, 155 Atl. 499 (1931).

Go to article

Navigable Waters - Public And Private Rights Therein Jan 1932

Navigable Waters - Public And Private Rights Therein

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiffs who owned the land underneath waters capable of navigation and who had been operating an established business of carrying passengers for hire in glass-bottomed boats in order to view the rock formations and sea vegetation, sought to enjoin defendants from operating competing boats. Held, in junction should be denied. Silver Springs Paradise Co. v. Ray (Fla. 1931) 50 F.(2d) 356.

Go to article

Negligence - Res Ipsa Loquitur - Circumstantial Evidence Jan 1932

Negligence - Res Ipsa Loquitur - Circumstantial Evidence

Michigan Law Review

Defendant company owned, and was in possession of, a wall, from the top of which a loose piece of concrete fell and injured the plaintiff who was at work on land adjoining. In affirming a judgment for plaintiff, the court held that, while the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur did not apply, there was "evidence from which the jury could legitimately infer that the defendant was negligent in permitting loose pieces of concrete to remain on the wall." Pope v. Rending Co., (Pa. 1931) 156 Atl. 106.

Go to article

Taxation - Constitutionality Of A Conclusive Presumption That A Transfer Executed Within A Limited Period Before Death Is Made In Contemplation Of Death Jan 1932

Taxation - Constitutionality Of A Conclusive Presumption That A Transfer Executed Within A Limited Period Before Death Is Made In Contemplation Of Death

Michigan Law Review

Motion for a refund by the plaintiff on the ground that certain transfers made within two years of the death of the decedent should not have been subjected to the federal estate tax as they were not in fact made in contemplation of death. The defendant filed a statutory demurrer on the ground that section 302 of the Revenue Act as amended in 1926 (26 U. S. C. A. sec. 1049C) renders such property taxable irrespective of what impelled the transfer. The section reads, "Where within two years prior to his death and without consideration the decedent has made a …

Go to article

Wills-Status Of Illegitimates Under Bequest To Children Jan 1932

Wills-Status Of Illegitimates Under Bequest To Children

Michigan Law Review

The testator devised $5,000 to "the children of my deceased sister B, to be divided equally among those living at my death, including the child or children of a deceased child by right of representation." B had one child who predeceased the testator, leaving two illegitimate children, the complainants. Held, the illegitimates can take, providing they can show that the testator knew that they were the only surviving offspring, at the time the will was made. In re Kauffer's will, (Wis. 1931) 234 N.W. 502.

Go to article

First Prev