Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (36)
- State and Local Government Law (25)
- Torts (25)
- Administrative Law (20)
- Intellectual Property Law (19)
-
- Environmental Law (17)
- Supreme Court of the United States (17)
- Courts (15)
- Legislation (14)
- Health Law and Policy (12)
- Jurisdiction (11)
- Labor and Employment Law (11)
- Securities Law (11)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (10)
- Land Use Law (9)
- Litigation (9)
- Property Law and Real Estate (8)
- Science and Technology Law (7)
- Food and Drug Law (6)
- Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law (6)
- Business (5)
- Civil Procedure (5)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (5)
- Consumer Protection Law (5)
- Energy and Utilities Law (5)
- Immigration Law (5)
- Law and Society (5)
- Natural Resources Law (5)
- Physical Sciences and Mathematics (5)
- Institution
-
- University of Kentucky (19)
- University of Michigan Law School (17)
- Boston University School of Law (14)
- George Washington University Law School (13)
- University of Colorado Law School (9)
-
- William & Mary Law School (9)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (8)
- Georgetown University Law Center (7)
- University of Georgia School of Law (5)
- University of Washington School of Law (5)
- Florida State University College of Law (4)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (4)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (4)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (4)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (3)
- Columbia Law School (3)
- Cornell University Law School (3)
- Pace University (3)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (3)
- University of Denver (3)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (3)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (3)
- American University Washington College of Law (2)
- Duke Law (2)
- St. John's University School of Law (2)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (2)
- University of Baltimore Law (2)
- University of Maine School of Law (2)
- University of Richmond (2)
- Barry University School of Law (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Articles (26)
- Faculty Scholarship (21)
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (19)
- Faculty Publications (18)
- All Faculty Scholarship (14)
-
- GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works (13)
- Scholarly Works (9)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (6)
- Publications (5)
- Scholarship Chronologically (5)
- Scholarly Publications (4)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (4)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (3)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (3)
- Law Faculty Publications (3)
- Sturm College of Law: Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Supreme Court Case Files (3)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (2)
- Book Chapters (2)
- Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar (2)
- Faculty Articles (2)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Akron Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Amici Briefs (1)
- Best Management Practices (BMPs): What? How? And Why? (May 26) (1)
- FIMS Presentations (1)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (1)
- Faculty Publications & Other Works (1)
- Faculty Works (1)
- Journal Articles (1)
Articles 1 - 30 of 186
Full-Text Articles in Law
Brief Of Amici Curiae In Support Of The United States: Moyle & Idaho V. United States, David S. Cohen, Greer Donley, Rachel Rebouché
Brief Of Amici Curiae In Support Of The United States: Moyle & Idaho V. United States, David S. Cohen, Greer Donley, Rachel Rebouché
Amici Briefs
This amicus brief, submitted to the Supreme Court in Moyle v. United States, argues that Moyle, and the impending circuit split surrounding it, is a symptom of a larger workability problem with the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization framework. Dobbs is already proving, in its brief existence, to be unworkable, and must be overturned. In short order, the Dobbs ruling has ushered in an era of unprecedented legal and doctrinal chaos, precipitating a fury of disorienting legal battles across the country. The Dobbs framework has created destabilizing conflicts between federal and state authorities, as in the current …
Pro-Choice Plans, Brendan S. Maher
Pro-Choice Plans, Brendan S. Maher
Faculty Scholarship
After Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the United States Constitution may no longer protect abortion, but a surprising federal statute does. That statute is called the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), and it has long been one of the most powerful preemptive statutes in the entire United States Code. ERISA regulates “employee benefit plans,” which are the vehicle by which approximately 155 million people receive their health insurance. Plans are thus a major private payer for health benefits—and therefore abortions. While many post-Dobbs anti-abortion laws directly bar abortion by making either the receipt or provision of …
Food And Drug Regulation: Statutory And Regulatory Supplement (2023), Adam I. Muchmore
Food And Drug Regulation: Statutory And Regulatory Supplement (2023), Adam I. Muchmore
Journal Articles
This Statutory and Regulatory Supplement is intended for use with its companion casebook, Food and Drug Regulation: A Statutory Approach (2021). This is not a traditional statutory supplement. Instead, it contains selected, aggressively edited provisions of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), related statutes, and the Code of Federal Regulations. The Supplement includes all provisions assigned as reading in the casebook, as well as a few additional provisions that some professors may wish to cover. The excerpts are designed to be teachable rather than
Abortion Localism And Preemption In A Post-Roe Era, Kaitlin A. Caruso
Abortion Localism And Preemption In A Post-Roe Era, Kaitlin A. Caruso
Faculty Publications
In Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the Supreme Court eliminated federal constitutional protections for abortion in the United States, overruling Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey. That ruling returned much regulation of abortion to state control. But it will also accelerate a longstanding trend: municipal abortion regulation. And in the current world of local government law, increased local activity brings with it the question of state preemption. This article is the first to bring together the history and trends in local abortion policy with intrastate preemption doctrine to fully canvass the post-Roe local abortion …
The New Abortion Battleground, David S. Cohen, Greer Donley, Rachel Rebouché
The New Abortion Battleground, David S. Cohen, Greer Donley, Rachel Rebouché
Articles
This Article examines the paradigm shift that is occurring now that the Supreme Court has overturned Roe v. Wade. Returning abortion law to the states has spawned perplexing legal conflicts across state borders and between states and the federal government. This article emphasizes how these issues intersect with innovations in the delivery of abortion, which can now occur entirely online and transcend state boundaries. The interjurisdictional abortion wars are coming, and this Article is the first to provide the roadmap for the immediate aftermath of Roe’s reversal and what lies ahead.
Judges and scholars, and most recently the Supreme …
The Second Circuit's Cantero Decision Is Wrong About Preemption Under The National Bank Act, Arthur E. Wilmarth Jr.
The Second Circuit's Cantero Decision Is Wrong About Preemption Under The National Bank Act, Arthur E. Wilmarth Jr.
GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works
On September 15, 2022, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals issued its decision in Cantero v. Bank of America, N.A. Cantero held that the National Bank Act (NBA) preempted the application to national banks of a New York law requiring home mortgage lenders to pay a minimum rate of interest on mortgage escrow accounts. The Second Circuit declared that New York’s “minimum-interest requirement would exert control over a banking power granted by the federal government, so it would impermissibly interfere with national banks’ exercise of that power.”
The Second Circuit’s decision is clearly erroneous and should be rejected by the …
Displacement And Preemption Of Climate Nuisance Claims, Jonathan H. Adler
Displacement And Preemption Of Climate Nuisance Claims, Jonathan H. Adler
Faculty Publications
New York City and other municipalities have filed state-law-based nuisance suits against fossil fuel companies seeking compensatory damages for the consequences of climate change. Previous nuisance claims, filed under federal common law, were held to be displaced by federal environmental statutes. Defendants have argued that state-law-based claims should likewise be preempted. Yet while the enactment of federal regulatory statutes displaces federal common law actions for interstate pollution, such enactments do not necessarily preempt state common law actions, even where pollution crosses state boundaries, as it is more difficult to preempt state common law than it is to displace federal common …
Navigating The Identity Thicket: Trademark's Lost Theory Of Personality, The Right Of Publicity, And Preemption, Jennifer E. Rothman
Navigating The Identity Thicket: Trademark's Lost Theory Of Personality, The Right Of Publicity, And Preemption, Jennifer E. Rothman
All Faculty Scholarship
Both trademark and unfair competition laws and state right of publicity laws protect against unauthorized uses of a person’s identity. Increasingly, however, these rights are working at odds with one another, and can point in different directions with regard to who controls a person’s name, likeness, and broader indicia of identity. This creates what I call an "identity thicket" of overlapping and conflicting rights over a person’s identity. Current jurisprudence provides little to no guidance on the most basic questions surrounding this thicket, such as what right to use a person’s identity, if any, flows from the transfer of marks …
Preemption, Commandeering, And The Indian Child Welfare Act, Matthew L.M. Fletcher, Randall F. Khalil
Preemption, Commandeering, And The Indian Child Welfare Act, Matthew L.M. Fletcher, Randall F. Khalil
Articles
This year (2022), the Supreme Court agreed to review wide-ranging constitutional challenges to the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) brought by the State of Texas and three non-Indian foster families in the October 2022 Term. The Fifth Circuit, sitting en banc, held that certain provisions of ICWA violated the anti-commandeering principle implied in the Tenth Amendment and the equal protection component of the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
We argue that the anti-commandeering challenges against ICWA are unfounded because all provisions of ICWA provide a set of legal standards to be applied in states which validly and expressly preempt state …
Federalism, Free Competition, And Sherman Act Preemption Of State Restraints, Alan J. Meese
Federalism, Free Competition, And Sherman Act Preemption Of State Restraints, Alan J. Meese
Faculty Publications
The Sherman Act establishes free competition as the rule governing interstate trade. Banning private restraints cannot ensure that competitive markets allocate the nation's resources. State laws can pose identical threats to free markets, posing an obstacle to achieving Congress's goal to protect free competition.
The Sherman Act would thus override anticompetitive state laws under ordinary preemption standards. Nonetheless, the Supreme Court rejected such preemption in Parker v. Brown, creating the "state action doctrine." Parker and its progeny hold that state-imposed restraints are immune from Sherman Act preemption, even if they impose significant harm on out-of-state consumers. Parker's progeny …
Takings Localism, Nestor M. Davisdson, Timothy M. Mulvaney
Takings Localism, Nestor M. Davisdson, Timothy M. Mulvaney
Faculty Scholarship
Conflicts over “sanctuary” cities, minimum wage laws, and gender-neutral bathrooms have brought the problematic landscape of contemporary state preemption of local governance to national attention. This Article contends that more covert, although equally robust, state interference can be found in property, with significant consequences for our understanding of takings law.
Takings jurisprudence looks to the states to mediate most tensions between individual property rights and community needs, as the takings federalism literature recognizes. Takings challenges, however, often involve local governments. If the doctrine privileges the democratic process to resolve most takings claims, then, that critical process is a largely local …
Medical Device Artificial Intelligence: The New Tort Frontier, Charlotte A. Tschider
Medical Device Artificial Intelligence: The New Tort Frontier, Charlotte A. Tschider
Faculty Publications & Other Works
The medical device industry and new technology start-ups have dramatically increased investment in artificial intelligence (AI) applications, including diagnostic tools and AI-enabled devices. These technologies have been positioned to reduce climbing health costs while simultaneously improving health outcomes. Technologies like AI-enabled surgical robots, AI-enabled insulin pumps, and cancer detection applications hold tremendous promise, yet without appropriate oversight, they will likely pose major safety issues. While preventative safety measures may reduce risk to patients using these technologies, effective regulatory-tort regimes also permit recovery when preventative solutions are insufficient.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the administrative agency responsible for overseeing the …
The Twin Environmental Law Problems Of Preemption And Political Scale, Erin Ryan
The Twin Environmental Law Problems Of Preemption And Political Scale, Erin Ryan
Scholarly Publications
This is a daunting moment for the United States environmental movement. Since 2017, it often seems that federal environmental law is being systematically dismantled—most aggressively by the executive branch, but with tacit support from much of the sitting legislature, and likely with increasing support from the judiciary as well. For environmentalists, the assault on the regulatory accomplishments made over decades of previous lawmaking is cause for grief, but it also compels preparation for the challenges yet to come. This chapter advises environmentalists to resist federal preemption of state regulation and to think creatively about how to accomplish the goals of …
Environmental Rights For The 21st Century: A Comprehensive Analysis Of The Public Trust Doctrine And Rights Of Nature Movement, Erin Ryan, Holly Curry, Hayes Rule
Environmental Rights For The 21st Century: A Comprehensive Analysis Of The Public Trust Doctrine And Rights Of Nature Movement, Erin Ryan, Holly Curry, Hayes Rule
Scholarly Publications
This Article contrasts two theoretically distinct approaches to pursuing related objectives of environmental protection: the public trust doctrine and the rights of nature movement. It reviews the development of public trust and rights of nature principles in both domestic and international legal contexts, and explores points of theoretical commonality and contrast between the two, giving special attention to the opposing systems of environmental ethics from which the anthropocentric public trust and ecocentric rights of nature principles arise. The marked jurisdictional variation associated with both approaches suggests their evolving and inchoate nature as a guarantor of environmental rights. Moreover, both are …
Pricing Drugs Fairly, Govind C. Persad
Pricing Drugs Fairly, Govind C. Persad
Sturm College of Law: Faculty Scholarship
Dissatisfaction with drug prices has prompted a flurry of recent legislation and academic research. But while pharmaceutical policy often regards fair pricing as a goal, the concept of fairness itself frequently goes undefined. Legal scholarship—even work ostensibly focused on fairness—has not defined and defended an account of fair pricing. Recent legislative proposals passed by the House and proposed by Sens. Ron Wyden and Chuck Grassley have similarly avoided a determinate position on fairness. This Article explains and defends an account of what makes a price for a drug fair that identifies fair price with social value, argues for implementing fair …
Policy Brief: The Occ’S Repeated Failures To Comply With The Dodd-Frank Act And Other Legal Authorities Governing The Scope Of Preemption For National Banks And Federal Savings Associations, Arthur E. Wilmarth Jr.
Policy Brief: The Occ’S Repeated Failures To Comply With The Dodd-Frank Act And Other Legal Authorities Governing The Scope Of Preemption For National Banks And Federal Savings Associations, Arthur E. Wilmarth Jr.
GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works
This policy brief examines several failures by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to comply with the Dodd-Frank Act and other legal authorities governing the scope of preemption for national banks and federal savings associations. The policy brief argues that the OCC should promptly rescind or revise several of its existing rules, policies, and legal interpretations to bring those materials into compliance with the Dodd-Frank Act and other applicable laws.
Amici Curiae Brief Of The International Municipal Lawyers Association And Legal Scholars In Support Of Defendants-Appellees In Portland Pipe Line Corporation, Et Al. V. City Of South Portland, Et Al., Sarah J. Fox, Sara C. Bronin, Nestor M. Davidson, Keith H. Hirokawa, Ashira Pelman Ostrow, Dave Owen, Laurie Reynolds, Jonathan D. Rosenbloom, Sarah Schindler
Amici Curiae Brief Of The International Municipal Lawyers Association And Legal Scholars In Support Of Defendants-Appellees In Portland Pipe Line Corporation, Et Al. V. City Of South Portland, Et Al., Sarah J. Fox, Sara C. Bronin, Nestor M. Davidson, Keith H. Hirokawa, Ashira Pelman Ostrow, Dave Owen, Laurie Reynolds, Jonathan D. Rosenbloom, Sarah Schindler
Sturm College of Law: Faculty Scholarship
This brief to the Maine Supreme Judicial Court was filed in support of the City of South Portland by the Amici Curiae, including the International Municipal Lawyers Association and legal scholars, to provide the Court with a background on the role of local governments in land use planning, and to explain why the City of South Portland’s Clear Skies Ordinance falls easily within the City’s authority and was not preempted by state legislation.
After studying the potential for bulk loading of crude oil within its boundaries, the City of South Portland concluded that the infrastructure requirements and environmental impacts of …
Check State: Avoiding Preemption By Using Incentives, Michael Allan Wolf
Check State: Avoiding Preemption By Using Incentives, Michael Allan Wolf
UF Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Principles Of Home Rule For The Twenty-First Century, Richard Briffault, Nestor M. Davidson, Paul A. Diller, Sarah Fox, Laurie Reynolds, Erin A. Scharff, Richard Schragger, Rick Su
Principles Of Home Rule For The Twenty-First Century, Richard Briffault, Nestor M. Davidson, Paul A. Diller, Sarah Fox, Laurie Reynolds, Erin A. Scharff, Richard Schragger, Rick Su
Faculty Scholarship
The National League of Cities’ “Principles of Home Rule for the Twenty-First Century” updates the American Municipal Association’s 1953 “Model Constitutional Provisions for Municipal Home Rule.” The AMA approach was widely adopted, but those provisions are now over 65 years old and intervening social, demographic, economic, and political changes necessitates a new approach to the legal structure of state-local relations. The NLC’s approach is organized around four basic principles, which are cashed-out in a model constitutional home rule provision, with commentary. The first principle states that a state’s law of home rule should provide local governments the full capacity to …
The Occ's And Fdic's Attempts To Confer Banking Privileges On Nonbanks And Commercial Firms Violate Federal Laws And Are Contrary To Public Policy, Arthur E. Wilmarth Jr.
The Occ's And Fdic's Attempts To Confer Banking Privileges On Nonbanks And Commercial Firms Violate Federal Laws And Are Contrary To Public Policy, Arthur E. Wilmarth Jr.
GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) have adopted several recent measures that attempt to confer benefits and privileges of banks on nonbank providers of financial services and commercial firms. The OCC’s and FDIC’s initiatives are unlawful and dangerous because they would allow nonbanks and commercial firms to subvert fundamental public policies embodied in federal laws governing banks and bank holding companies.
In 2018, the OCC announced that it would approve national bank charters for “fintech” firms that provide lending and payment services but do not accept deposits. The New York …
Comment Letter In Opposition To The Occ's Proposed "Valid-When-Made" Rule, Arthur E. Wilmarth Jr.
Comment Letter In Opposition To The Occ's Proposed "Valid-When-Made" Rule, Arthur E. Wilmarth Jr.
GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works
This comment letter responds to a proposed rule issued by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), which would “codify” an alleged federal common-law “principle” known as “valid-when-made.” The proposed rule would amend two of the OCC’s regulations – 12 C.F.R. 7.4001 and 12 C.F.R. 160.110 – by providing that “interest on a loan that is permissible” for a national bank or a federal savings association, under 12 U.S.C. 85 or 12 U.S.C. 1463(g)(1), “shall not be affected by the sale, assignment, or other transfer of the loan.” 84 Fed. Reg. 64229, 64230-31 (Nov. 21, 2019). Thus, the …
Comment Letter In Opposition To The Occ's Proposed "True Lender" Rule, Arthur E. Wilmarth Jr.
Comment Letter In Opposition To The Occ's Proposed "True Lender" Rule, Arthur E. Wilmarth Jr.
GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works
This comment letter opposes the adoption of a proposed rule published by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) on July 22, 2020. 85 Fed. Reg. 44223 (2020). The proposed rule would determine whether a national bank or federal savings association “makes a loan and is the ‘true lender’ in the context of a partnership between a bank and a third party, such as a marketplace lender.” Id. The proposed rule – to be codified at 12 C.F.R. 7.1031 – would provide that a national bank or federal savings association is deemed to “make” a loan if the …
Federalism, Erisa, And State Single-Payer Health Care, Erin C. Fuse Brown, Elizabeth Mccuskey
Federalism, Erisa, And State Single-Payer Health Care, Erin C. Fuse Brown, Elizabeth Mccuskey
Faculty Scholarship
While federal health reform sputters, states have begun to pursue their own transformative strategies for achieving universal coverage, the most ambitious of which are state-based single-payer plans. Since the passage of the Affordable Care Act in 2010, legislators in twenty-one states have proposed sixty-six unique bills to establish single-payer health care systems. This paper systematically surveys those state legislative efforts and exposes the federalism trap that threatens to derail them: ERISA's preemption of state regulation relating to employer-sponsored health insurance. ERISA's expansive preemption provision creates a narrow, risky path for state regulation to capture the employer health care expenditures crucial …
Neglecting Nationalism, Gil Seinfeld
Neglecting Nationalism, Gil Seinfeld
Articles
Federalism is a system of government that calls for the division of power between a central authority and member states. It is designed to secure benefits that flow from centralization and from devolution, as well as benefits that accrue from a simultaneous commitment to both. A student of modern American federalism, however, might have a very different impression, for significant swaths of the case law and scholarly commentary on the subject neglect the centralizing, nationalist side of the federal balance. This claim may come as a surprise, since it is obviously the case that our national government has become immensely …
Environmental Law. Disrupted., Erin Ryan
Environmental Law. Disrupted., Erin Ryan
Scholarly Publications
The U.S. regulatory environment is changing rapidly, at the same time that visible and profound impacts of climate change are already being felt throughout the world, and enormous, potentially existential threats loom in the not-so-distant future. What does it mean to think about and practice environmental law in this setting? In this latest in a biannual series of postings and essays, the authors, members of the Environmental Law Collaborative (ELC), have taken on the question of whether environmental law as we currently know it is up to the job of addressing these threats; and, if not, what the path forward …
Towards Optimal Enforcement, Kent H. Barnett
Towards Optimal Enforcement, Kent H. Barnett
Scholarly Works
In Private Enforcement in Administrative Courts, Professor Michael Sant'Ambrogio argues that a hybrid private/public enforcement model in agency proceedings may provide the best hope of achieving optimal federal law enforcement. In other words, a blunderbuss approach of choosing public enforcement or private enforcement (whether in judicial or agency proceedings) is unlikely to prove ideal. He identifies various tools--such as agencies' role in the review or initiation of proceedings, or the use of class-wide proceedings--that Congress or agencies can use to calibrate agency enforcement to its optimal design. I consider three additional tools that may optimize enforcement goals with hybrid public …
Chapter 8: Is The Preemption Clause Of Erisa Unconstitutional?, Andrew Morrison, Elizabeth Mccuskey
Chapter 8: Is The Preemption Clause Of Erisa Unconstitutional?, Andrew Morrison, Elizabeth Mccuskey
Faculty Scholarship
The authors suggest plaintiffs and/or state attorneys general should consider taking Justice Clarence Thomas up on his effective suggestion, in the 2016 Supreme Court case of Gobeille v. Liberty Mutual Insurance, to put before the federal courts the question whether the preemption clause of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) represented a valid exercise of federal power under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution. ERISA’s exceptionally broad statement of preemption does in fact seem to have unconstitutional reach: It purports to preempt “any and all” state laws that simply “relate to” employee benefits, a formulation without logical …
Constitutional Environmental Law, Or, The Constitutional Consequences Of Insisting That The Environment Is Everybody's Business, Robin Kundis Craig
Constitutional Environmental Law, Or, The Constitutional Consequences Of Insisting That The Environment Is Everybody's Business, Robin Kundis Craig
Utah Law Faculty Scholarship
Constitutional environmental law has become a recognized and institutionalized specialty within environmental law, an acknowledgement of the pervasive interactions between the U.S. Constitution and the federal environmental statutes that go well beyond the normal constitutional underpinnings of federal administrative law. This Article posits that constitutional environmental law is the result of Congress consciously deciding that environmental protection is everybody’s business — specifically, from Congress’s that states should participate in rather than be preempted by federal environmental law, that private citizens and organizations should help to enforce the statutes, and that private land and water rights are necessary components of national …
On Drugs: Preemption, Presumption, And Remedy, Elizabeth Mccuskey
On Drugs: Preemption, Presumption, And Remedy, Elizabeth Mccuskey
Faculty Scholarship
This essay explores the role of litigation in drug safety regulation and the role of drug safety regulation in litigation, exemplified by the 2017 National Health Law Moot Court Problem. Using the example of failure-to-update claims against generic drug manufacturers, this essay argues that pharmaceutical preemption doctrine would benefit from a tailored application of the presumption against preemption. It proposes a presumption that Congress does not intend to displace historic state remedies for injury without clearly saying so, focusing on the role of remedy to account for the evolving overlap in federal and state police powers over health and to …
Memo To Environmentalists: Brace For The Three Ps, Erin Ryan
Memo To Environmentalists: Brace For The Three Ps, Erin Ryan
Scholarly Publications
This very short essay, written as a memo to environmental advocates during a destabilizing moment in environmental law, advises them to (1) resist federal preemption of state regulation, (2) scrutinize the strategic deployment of property rights to block future regulation, and (3) think creatively about how to accomplish the goals of national-level policy without the benefit of federal authority. In short, it advises that advocates ensure that the campaign to dismantle federal environmental law does not spill over into displacing state and local efforts to fill the void. They also must push back against the strategic deployment of property rights …