Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Torts (137)
- Litigation (39)
- Environmental Law (35)
- Contracts (30)
- Business Organizations Law (29)
-
- Insurance Law (27)
- Legislation (22)
- Law and Economics (21)
- Legal Remedies (21)
- State and Local Government Law (21)
- Courts (19)
- Intellectual Property Law (19)
- Commercial Law (18)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (18)
- Securities Law (17)
- Criminal Law (16)
- International Law (15)
- Civil Procedure (14)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (13)
- Constitutional Law (13)
- Health Law and Policy (13)
- Science and Technology Law (12)
- Administrative Law (11)
- Business (11)
- Civil Law (11)
- Consumer Protection Law (11)
- Internet Law (11)
- Labor and Employment Law (11)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (11)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (81)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (23)
- University of Kentucky (22)
- Boston University School of Law (16)
- American University Washington College of Law (15)
-
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (15)
- Roger Williams University (13)
- St. Mary's University (12)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (12)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (10)
- University of Georgia School of Law (9)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (9)
- University of Colorado Law School (8)
- Columbia Law School (6)
- Notre Dame Law School (6)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (6)
- George Washington University Law School (5)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (5)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (5)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (5)
- University of Missouri School of Law (5)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (5)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (4)
- University of Richmond (4)
- University of South Carolina (4)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (3)
- Cleveland State University (3)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (3)
- St. John's University School of Law (3)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (3)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Articles (84)
- Faculty Scholarship (34)
- Scholarly Works (27)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (23)
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (21)
-
- Faculty Publications (16)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (14)
- All Faculty Scholarship (12)
- Faculty Articles (12)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (12)
- Journal Articles (8)
- Faculty Works (6)
- Other Publications (6)
- GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works (5)
- Law Faculty Publications (5)
- UF Law Faculty Publications (5)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (4)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (4)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (4)
- Book Chapters (3)
- Faculty Working Papers (3)
- Business and Economics Faculty Publications (2)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (2)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (2)
- LLM Theses and Essays (2)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (2)
- Law School Blogs (2)
- Louis Jackson National Student Writing Competition (2)
- Marine Affairs Institute Staff Publications (2)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (2)
Articles 361 - 379 of 379
Full-Text Articles in Law
Limitation As To The Amount Of Liability For Loss Of Goods By Carriers, Edwin C. Goddard
Limitation As To The Amount Of Liability For Loss Of Goods By Carriers, Edwin C. Goddard
Articles
A carload of automobiles was shipped by express, under an express receipt limiting recovery to $50, unless a greater value was named and a greater carrying charge paid. The shipper knew of this stipulation, and deliberately chose the restricted liability so as to secure the lower rate. On a suit for loss of the automobiles, recovery was limited to $50. Geo. N. Pierce Co. v. Wells Fargo & Co., 189 Fed. 561, commented on in 10 MICH. L. REB. 317. The United States Supreme Court has just affirmed this decision, 35 Sup. Ct. 351.
The Effect Of The Carmack Amendment To The Hepburn Act Upon Limitation By Common Carriers Of The Amount Of Their Liability, Edwin C. Goddard
The Effect Of The Carmack Amendment To The Hepburn Act Upon Limitation By Common Carriers Of The Amount Of Their Liability, Edwin C. Goddard
Articles
Two cases, decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on March 1O, 1913, may be considered together. They are developments of the cases reviewed in 11 MICH. L. Rev. 460. Plaintiff shipped two boxes and a barrel of "household goods" under an agreement that the goods, in case of loss, should be valued at $5 per hundred-weight. One box, weighing not over 200 pounds and actually worth $75, was lost. The Supreme Court of Arkansas affirmed a judgment against the carrier for the full value. 91 Ark. 97, 121 S. W. 932, 134 A. S. R. 56. On …
Provability In Bankruptcy Of Claims Arising Out Of Alimony Decrees Or Separation Agreements Between Husband And Wife, Ralph W. Aigler
Provability In Bankruptcy Of Claims Arising Out Of Alimony Decrees Or Separation Agreements Between Husband And Wife, Ralph W. Aigler
Articles
It was not until the decisions in Audubon v. Shufeldt, 181 U. S. 575, and Wetmore v. Markoe; 196 U. S. 68, that it was authoritatively determined in this country that alimony, whether in arrears at the time of filing petition, or payable in the future, was not provable in bankruptcy.
Quasi-Contractual Obligations Of Municipal Corporations, Jerome C. Knowlton
Quasi-Contractual Obligations Of Municipal Corporations, Jerome C. Knowlton
Articles
We have constructive fraud, constructive trusts, constructive notice, and why not constructive contract, a contractual obligation existing in contemplation of law, in the absence of any agreement express or implied from facts? With this apology we shall use the term quasi contract as covering an obligation created by law and enforceable by an action ex contractu. We are not for the present interested in the circumstances which may give rise to this obligation as between individuals; nor as between an individual and a private corporation, or quasi public corporation, so-called, as a railroad or other public utility. In these cases …
Limitation Of The Amount Of The Common Carrier's Liability, Edwin C. Goddard
Limitation Of The Amount Of The Common Carrier's Liability, Edwin C. Goddard
Articles
When the case of Railroad v. Lockwood, 17 Wall. (U. S.) 357, settled the law that the common carrier can not contract against liability for losses due to his negligence, it did not put an end to the efforts of common carriers to escape liability for losses so arising.
Influence Of Social And Economic Ideals On The Law Of Malicious Torts, W. Gordon Stoner
Influence Of Social And Economic Ideals On The Law Of Malicious Torts, W. Gordon Stoner
Articles
"The existence and the alteration of human institutions," says DICEY, "must in a sense, always and everywhere depend upon the beliefs or feelings, or, in other words, upon the opinion of the society in which such institutions flourish."1 Undoubtedly, law, as much as any other human institution, has felt this influence of public opinion. The political, economical and ethical ideals of a people find expression in their laws. True it is that public opinion is usually, if not always, in the lead, but in a truly happy and contented society the distance is never great. As MAINE says, in progressive …
Contract Limitations Of The Common Carrier's Liability, Edwin C. Goddard
Contract Limitations Of The Common Carrier's Liability, Edwin C. Goddard
Articles
When Mr. Justice NELSON, in the New Jersey Steam Navigation Company v. Merchants Bank, speaking of the power of a common carrier by special agreement to restrict his obligation, said for the court: "We are unable to perceive any well founded objection to the restriction," he opened the way for an amount of litigation which, in volume and expense, both to carriers and shippers, scarcely finds its equal on any other question. The Supreme Court of North Carolina was well within the limit when it said: "The right of a common carrier to limit or diminish his general liability by …
Limitation Of A Carrier's Liability For Negligence, Edson R. Sunderland
Limitation Of A Carrier's Liability For Negligence, Edson R. Sunderland
Articles
Limitation of a Carrier's Liability for Negligence.-This is one of the subjects which never seems to be set at rest. In making contracts, shipper and carrier do not stand upon an equality. The shipper cannot exist without the aid of the carrier, but the carrier can easily forego the business of any particular shipper. Hence the ordinary rules of contract fail in many respects to meet the demands of the situation. To properly define the limitations necessary to be placed upon these rules is not an easy task.
Liability Of Water Companies For Losses By Fire In Actions Of Tort, Ralph W. Aigler
Liability Of Water Companies For Losses By Fire In Actions Of Tort, Ralph W. Aigler
Articles
In Fisher v. Greensboro Water Supply Company, 128 N. C. 375, it was held that the defendant water company was liable in damages in an action of tort for negligent failure to furnish sufficient water pressure in the mains of the city, by reason of which negligence the plaintiff's house was burned. The only duty on the part of the defendant to furnish water grew out of a contract made by the company with the city and the fact that the defendant had entered upon the business of supplying water pursuant to such contract.
The Right Of Bailees To Contract Against Liability For Negligence, Hugh Evander Willis
The Right Of Bailees To Contract Against Liability For Negligence, Hugh Evander Willis
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Liability Of Hospitals For The Negligence Of Their Physicians And Nurses, Harry B. Hutchins
Liability Of Hospitals For The Negligence Of Their Physicians And Nurses, Harry B. Hutchins
Articles
Liability of Hospitals for the Negligence of their Physicians and Nurses.-This question was recently examined by the Supreme Court of Utah in the case of Gitzhoffen v. Sisters of Holy Cross Hospital Association, 88 Pac. Rep. 691 (Jan. 26, 1907), and the opinion filed may well serve as a basis for comment. The hospital association was sued for damages for injuries that plaintiff claimed to have sustained through the negligence of defendant's nurses.
The Liability Of Charitable Corporations For The Torts Of Their Servants, Harry B. Hutchins
The Liability Of Charitable Corporations For The Torts Of Their Servants, Harry B. Hutchins
Articles
The Liability of Charitable Corporations for the Torts of their Servants.--This question was discussed quite fully in the last number of the REVIEW, pp. 552-559, under the title Liability of Hospitals for the Negligence of their Physicians and Nurses, particular attention being given to the reasons underlying the doctrine that charitable corporations are not liable for the negligence of their servants, provided proper care has been exercised in their selection, and to the limitations within which that doctrine should be confined. It was concluded that the true reason for the doctrine is not to be found, as many cases apparently …
Are A Knowledge Of An Offer And Intent To Accept Essential To The Recovery Of A Reward Offered?, Hugh Evander Willis
Are A Knowledge Of An Offer And Intent To Accept Essential To The Recovery Of A Reward Offered?, Hugh Evander Willis
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Liability Of Water Companies For Fire Losses, Edson R. Sunderland
Liability Of Water Companies For Fire Losses, Edson R. Sunderland
Articles
In two recent articles published'in this Review, the question of the liability of water companies for fire losses was somewhat exhaustively discussed. The majority of the actions wherein it has been sought to hold water companies liable for fire losses suffered by private property owners, have been brought for breach of contract. In a few cases the theory adopted was that the water company owed a duty to all property owners, by reason of the public character of its service; and the fact that it was under contract with the city to furnish an adequate water supply and pressure for …
Growth Of The Power Of Contract In The History Of The Liability Of Common Carriers, Hugh Evander Willis
Growth Of The Power Of Contract In The History Of The Liability Of Common Carriers, Hugh Evander Willis
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Authority Of Allen V. Flood, Horace Lafayette Wilgus
Authority Of Allen V. Flood, Horace Lafayette Wilgus
Articles
In the case of Allen v. Flood, one of the Lords asked this interesting question, "If the cook says to her master, 'Discharge the butler or I leave you,' and the master discharges the butler, does the butler have an action against the cook?" This, Lord Shand said, was the simplest form in which the very question in Allen v. Flood could be raised.4 And, like the original question, it puzzled the judges and Lords very much to answer.
Lake Superior Mining Co. V. Catharine Erickson, Thomas M. Cooley
Lake Superior Mining Co. V. Catharine Erickson, Thomas M. Cooley
Articles
"Where a mining company let a contract for taking out a certain quantity of ore, but employed persons of supposed skill to watch for dangers from loosened rocks, and in other ways retained a control over the mode of mining, and a servant of the contractors was killed by the falling of a rock, the danger from which ought to have been detected and guarded against: Held, that the mining company was responsible."
Liability Of Public Officers To Private Actions For Neglect Of Official Duty, Thomas M. Cooley
Liability Of Public Officers To Private Actions For Neglect Of Official Duty, Thomas M. Cooley
Articles
A public office is a public trust.The incumbent has a property right in it, but the office is conferred, not for his benefit, but for the benefit of the political society. The duties imposed upon the officer are supposed to be capable of classification under one of three heads: the legislative, executive, or judicial; and to pertain, accordingly, to one of the three departments of the government designated by these names. But the classification cannot be very exact, and there are numerous officers who cannot be classified at all under these heads. The reason will be apparent if we name …
The Cases In Which The Master Is Liable For Injuries To Servants In His Employ, Thomas M. Cooley
The Cases In Which The Master Is Liable For Injuries To Servants In His Employ, Thomas M. Cooley
Articles
The frequency with which questions arise, and become the subject of legal controversy, concerning the liability of an employer to persons receiving injuries in his service, must be the excuse for the present paper. The legal questions have recently received the attention of many able jurists, and several of the difficulties which surrounded the general subject but a few years ago may now be considered permanently removed. The purpose here will be, to present the general rules which have been laid down by the authorities, with some of the reasons on which they are based.