Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Intellectual Property Law (16)
- Law and Society (15)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (9)
- Health Law and Policy (9)
- Environmental Law (7)
-
- Natural Resources Law (7)
- Immigration Law (6)
- International Trade Law (6)
- Internet Law (6)
- Law and Politics (6)
- Legal Profession (6)
- Water Law (6)
- Administrative Law (5)
- Criminal Law (4)
- Food and Drug Law (4)
- International Law (4)
- Law and Economics (4)
- Law and Race (4)
- Legal Education (4)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (4)
- Property Law and Real Estate (4)
- State and Local Government Law (4)
- Constitutional Law (3)
- Criminal Procedure (3)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (3)
- Legislation (3)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (3)
- Science and Technology Law (3)
- Computer Law (2)
- Keyword
-
- Technology (3)
- Artificial intelligence (2)
- Automation (2)
- Copyright (2)
- Law and technology (2)
-
- Social justice (2)
- Surveillance (2)
- AI (1)
- Access to Law (1)
- Access to Medication (1)
- Access to justice (1)
- Administrative law (1)
- Adoption (1)
- Air pollution (1)
- Algorithmic accountability (1)
- Algorithmic governance (1)
- Algorithms (1)
- Arbitration (1)
- Assistance (1)
- Attorney discipline (1)
- Attorney regulation (1)
- Bail (1)
- Beach Access (1)
- Border (1)
- Bryan Stevenson (1)
- Canadian judgments (1)
- Carpenter v. United States (1)
- Childhood sexual violence (1)
- China (1)
- Christine Blasey Ford (1)
Articles 61 - 71 of 71
Full-Text Articles in Law
Copyright And The 1%, Glynn Lunney
Copyright And The 1%, Glynn Lunney
Faculty Scholarship
No one ever argues for copyright on the grounds that superstar artists and authors need more money, but what if that is all, or mostly all, that copyright does? This article presents newly available data on the distribution of players across the PC videogame market. This data reveals an L-shaped distribution of demand. A relative handful of games are extremely popular. The vast majority are not. In the face of an L curve, copyright overpays superstars, but does very little for the average author and for works at the margins of profitability. This makes copyright difficult to justify on either …
Geographical Indications Of Origin, Economic Development, And Cultural Heritage: Good Match Or Mismatch?, Irene Calboli
Geographical Indications Of Origin, Economic Development, And Cultural Heritage: Good Match Or Mismatch?, Irene Calboli
Faculty Scholarship
In this article, I propose that geographical indications (GIs) carry important economic benefits. First, GIs are essential instruments to facilitate investments in high-quality products and niche markets, and promote local trade and development. Second, GIs offer an additional layer of information for consumers about the geographical origin and quality of the products they identify, in turn reducing the information asymmetries between producers and consumers. Third, because of this information function, GIs can assist in rewarding or holding producers accountable for their products based on the additional information they convey to the market. Yet, GIs can also protect culture-related interests and …
The U.S. Posture On Global Access To Medication & The Case For Change, Michael Palmedo, Srividhya Ragavan
The U.S. Posture On Global Access To Medication & The Case For Change, Michael Palmedo, Srividhya Ragavan
Faculty Scholarship
The year 2020 marks the 25th anniversary of including intellectual property rights within the larger agenda of trade. While the marriage between trade and intellectual property was always uncomfortable, COVID-19 exposed the flaws, failures and the inadequacy of the trade agenda to harmonise intellectual property rights, particularly for patents in pharmaceuticals. Typically, the United States through its questionable United States Trade Representative (USTR) process exposed the vulnerabilities of the intellectual property systems of the rest of the world. COVID-19 exposed the manner in which the so-called ‘superior’ intellectual property regime of the US left the country with a weak health-care …
Trauma-Informed Advocacy: Learning To Empathize With Unspeakable Horrors, Susan Ayres
Trauma-Informed Advocacy: Learning To Empathize With Unspeakable Horrors, Susan Ayres
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Ethical Blind Spots In Adoption Lawyering, Malinda L. Seymore
Ethical Blind Spots In Adoption Lawyering, Malinda L. Seymore
Faculty Scholarship
Lawyers engaged in adoption work often call it “happy law,” and consider adoption – finding a child for yearning parents, finding parents for a needy child – an unmitigated good. That attitude can mask the fact that all adoption begins with loss. One family loses a child so that another family can gain one. A lawyer’s assurance that she is engaged in positive work can lead to ethical blind spots that ignore the complexities of adoption practice. And while the touchstone of adoption is the best interests of the child, the primacy in legal ethics of the interests of the …
Goodbye To Concurring Opinions, Meg Penrose
Goodbye To Concurring Opinions, Meg Penrose
Faculty Scholarship
Modern Supreme Court opinions are too long. They are too fractured. And they often lack clarity. Separate opinions, particularly concurring opinions, are largely to blame. Today’s justices are more inclined to publish separate opinions than their predecessors.The justices do not want to read lengthy briefs but appear willing to publish lengthy opinions. Yet the justices owe us clarity. They should want the law to be understandable—and understood. In hopes of achieving greater legal clarity, this article calls for an end to concurring opinions.
The modern Court writes more separate opinions than past courts. It is becoming far too common that …
Transparency After Carpenter, Hannah Bloch-Wehba
Transparency After Carpenter, Hannah Bloch-Wehba
Faculty Scholarship
This brief invited response to Professor Matthew Tokson’s Foulston-Siefkin lecture on the Supreme Court's decision in Carpenter v. United States makes two contributions. First, I highlight the social, political, and economic factors at play in the Carpenter decision. The Carpenter Court recognized, in particular, that digital surveillance implicates the rights of more than just criminal suspects: it poses unique and unappreciated threats to public governance of policing. The decision, I argue, reflects longstanding preoccupations in Fourth Amendment decisions with protecting the “public” — particularly innocent third parties — from intrusive and baseless investigations. In so doing, I situate Professor Tokson’s …
The Race To The Middle, William Magnuson
The Race To The Middle, William Magnuson
Faculty Scholarship
How does federalism affect the quality of law? It is one of the fundamental questions of our constitutional system. Scholars of federalism generally fall into one of two camps on the question. One camp argues that regulatory competition between states leads to a “race to the bottom,” in which states adopt progressively worse laws in order to pander to powerful constituencies. The other camp, conversely, argues that regulatory competition leads to a “race to the top,” incentivizing states to adopt progressively better laws in the search for more desirable outcomes for their constituencies. Despite their apparent differences, however, both the …
Boynton V. Virginia And The Anxieties Of The Modern African-American Customer, Amber Baylor
Boynton V. Virginia And The Anxieties Of The Modern African-American Customer, Amber Baylor
Faculty Scholarship
In 1958, Bruce Boynton was arrested for ordering food in a Whites-Only diner and charged with criminal trespass. Sixty years later, African Americans continue to face arrest and threat of arrest in commercial establishments based on discriminatory trespass claims. When store owners or employees decide to exclude would-be patrons from their establishment for discriminatory reasons, both overt and implicit, they rely on the police to enforce this form of discrimination. This article considers the legacy of Boynton v. Virginia, particularly the resonance of Boynton’s unaddressed claim, that the state enforcement of discriminatory trespass allegations is an Equal Protection violation.
African-American …
In Times Of Chaos: Creating Blueprints For Law School Responses To Natural Disasters, Jeffrey R. Baker, Christine E. Cerniglia, Davida Finger, Luz E. Herrera, Jonel Newman
In Times Of Chaos: Creating Blueprints For Law School Responses To Natural Disasters, Jeffrey R. Baker, Christine E. Cerniglia, Davida Finger, Luz E. Herrera, Jonel Newman
Faculty Scholarship
A recent onslaught of domestic natural disasters created acute, critical needs for legal services for people displaced and harmed by storms and fires. In 2017, Hurricanes Harvey, Irma, Maria and Michael struck much of Texas, Florida, and Puerto Rico, displacing millions from their homes. Wildfires burned throughout California and tested the capacity of pro bono and legal aid systems across the state. In 2018, Hurricane Florence flooded North Carolina, and Hurricane Michael devastated the Florida Panhandle. California again suffered wildfires, the largest and most devastating in recorded history. Natural disasters are both more common and more destructive, the “new abnormal.” …
Why Protect Unauthorized Workers? Imperfect Proxies, Unaccountable Employers, And Antidiscrimination Law's Failures, Angela D. Morrison
Why Protect Unauthorized Workers? Imperfect Proxies, Unaccountable Employers, And Antidiscrimination Law's Failures, Angela D. Morrison
Faculty Scholarship
This article explores a gap in the scholarship regarding the unauthorized workplace. It describes and names the two main justifications on which advocates and courts have relied to extend federal antidiscrimination protections to unauthorized workers. First, the proxy justification insists that workplace protections must include unauthorized workers because their protection is necessary to protect U.S. citizen and authorized workers. Second, the deterrence/accountability justification states that workplace protections must include unauthorized workers because it will deter employers from future violations of antidiscrimination laws and hold them accountable for violations of immigration law. While these justifications have led to some protection for …