Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 5 of 5

Full-Text Articles in Law

Agenda: Moving The West's Water To New Uses: Winners And Losers, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center Jun 1990

Agenda: Moving The West's Water To New Uses: Winners And Losers, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center

Moving the West's Water to New Uses: Winners and Losers (Summer Conference, June 6-8)

Conference organizers and/or faculty included University of Colorado Law School professors Lawrence J. MacDonnell and Mark Squillace.

Moving the West's Water to New Uses: Winners and Losers will be the theme for this year's water conference, June 6-8 at the Law School in Boulder. The conference will consider the changing demands for water in the West and the need to reallocate a portion of the existing uses of water to new uses.

The first day will provide the background by looking at the most likely sources of water to meet these demands, including agriculture, federal water projects, interstate transfers, and …


Maine Women's Lobby News Letter (1990 - May) No. 3, Maine Women's Lobby Staff May 1990

Maine Women's Lobby News Letter (1990 - May) No. 3, Maine Women's Lobby Staff

Maine Women's Publications - All

No abstract provided.


Maine Women's Lobby News Letter (1990 - March) No. 2, Maine Women's Lobby Staff Mar 1990

Maine Women's Lobby News Letter (1990 - March) No. 2, Maine Women's Lobby Staff

Maine Women's Publications - All

No abstract provided.


The Eleventh Amendment, Process Federalism And The Clear Statement Rule, William P. Marshall Jan 1990

The Eleventh Amendment, Process Federalism And The Clear Statement Rule, William P. Marshall

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


Equality Theory, Marital Rape, And The Promise Of The Fourteenth Amendment, Robin West Jan 1990

Equality Theory, Marital Rape, And The Promise Of The Fourteenth Amendment, Robin West

Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works

During the 1980s a handful of state judges either held or opined in dicta what must be incontrovertible to the feminist community, as well as to most progressive legal advocates and academics: the so-called marital rape exemption, whether statutory or common law in origin, constitutes a denial of a married woman's constitutional right to equal protection under the law. Indeed, a more obvious denial of equal protection is difficult to imagine: the marital rape exemption denies married women protection against violent crime solely on the basis of gender and marital status. What possibly could be less rational than a statute …