Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Abstention (1)
- Colorado river (1)
- Comity (1)
- Concurrent (1)
- Cross-border investments (1)
-
- European Union (1)
- Extaterritorial (1)
- Extraterritoriality (1)
- Forum non conveniens (1)
- Forum shopping (1)
- International abstention (1)
- International comity (1)
- Judicial activism (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Landis (1)
- Legislative jurisdiction (1)
- Legitimacy (1)
- Lis pendens (1)
- Parallel (1)
- Personal jursidiction (1)
- Private litigation (1)
- Reactive (1)
- Securities fraud (1)
- Sovereignty (1)
- Taxation (1)
- Transnational (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Duplicative Foreign Litigation, Austen L. Parrish
Duplicative Foreign Litigation, Austen L. Parrish
Articles by Maurer Faculty
What should a court do when a lawsuit involving the same parties and the same issues is already pending in the court of another country? With the growth of transnational litigation, the issue of reactive, duplicative proceedings - and the waste inherent in such duplication - becomes a more common problem. The future does not promise change. In a modern, globalized world, litigants are increasingly tempted to forum shop among countries to find courts and law more favorably inclined to them than their opponents.
The federal courts, however, do not yet have a coherent response to the problem. They apply …
Personal Jurisdiction Over Foreign Directors In Cross-Border Securities Litigation, Hannah L. Buxbaum
Personal Jurisdiction Over Foreign Directors In Cross-Border Securities Litigation, Hannah L. Buxbaum
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Competence And Member State Autonomy: Causality, Consequence And Legitimacy, Paul Craig
Competence And Member State Autonomy: Causality, Consequence And Legitimacy, Paul Craig
Articles by Maurer Faculty
The scope of EU competence and the limits on Member State autonomy can validly be analyzed from a variety of perspectives. This chapter considers one such perspective, the prevailing concern about the scope and exercise of EU competence. This concern is often based on the premise that some reified entity called the EU has increasingly arrogated power, with a consequent diminution of national autonomy that the Member States have been unable to resist, and the ECJ is frequently regarded as bearing primary responsibility. it will however be argued in the first half of this chapter that the Community courts were …