Law Commons^™

Differing Perceptions Of Attorney Fees In Bankruptcy Cases, Theodore Eisenberg

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

Delivery Of Legal Services To Ordinary Americans, Roger C. Cramton

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Keeping Faith: Government Ethics & Government Ethics Regulation, Cynthia R. Farina

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

Legal Ethics And The Restatement Process -- The Sometimes-Uncomfortable Fit, Charles W. Wolfram

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Parts And Wholes: The Integrity Of The Model Rules, Charles W. Wolfram

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

As important as is each of its parts, the 1983 Model Rules of Professional Conduct was, of course, meant to function as a whole. At the very least, the parts were presumably intended to work well with one another, sketching a regulatory apparatus that would guide both lawyers subject to it and courts and regulators administering it in a coherent and consistent manner. To a large extent the Model Rules made significant headway in this respect, continuing the movement toward more explicit and articulated regulation of the profession begun by their predecessor, the Model Code of Professional Responsibility.

Yet, …

The U.S. Law Of Client Confidentiality: Framework For An International Perspective, Charles W. Wolfram

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

State Ethics Rules And Federal Prosecutors: The Controversies Over The Anti-Contact And Subpoena Rules, Roger C. Cramton, Lisa K. Udell

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Mandatory Pro Bono, Roger C. Cramton

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

Should lawyers be required to devote a portion of their time or money to public service activities? This issue, commonly referred to as "mandatory pro bono," is much discussed these days. The purpose of this article is to illuminate the policychoices before the profession by surveying the arguments for and against mandatory pro bono.

The Lawyer As Whistleblower: Confidentiality And The Government Lawyer, Roger C. Cramton

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

On The Steadfastness And Courage Of Government Lawyers, Roger C. Cramton

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Lawyer Turf And Lawyer Regulation -- The Role Of The Inherent-Powers Doctrine, Charles W. Wolfram

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

The Lawyer’S Professional Independence: Memories, Aspirations, And Realities, Roger C. Cramton

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

The Concept Of A Restatement Of The Law Governing Lawyers, Charles W. Wolfram

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Ethical Dilemmas Facing Today's Lawyer, Roger C. Cramton

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

The Second Set Of Players: Lawyers, Fee Shifting, And The Limits Of Professional Discipline, Charles W. Wolfram

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Client Perjury: The Kutak Commission And The Association Of Trial Lawyers On Lawyers, Lying Clients, And The Adversary System, Charles W. Wolfram

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

The Code Of Professional Responsibility As A Measure Of Attorney Liability In Civil Litigation, Charles W. Wolfram

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Client Perjury, Charles W. Wolfram

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Barriers To Effective Public Participation In Regulation Of The Legal Profession, Charles W. Wolfram

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Disbarment In The United States: Who Shall Do The Noisome Work?, Michael C. Dorf

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

A Report On Judicial Ethics, Gray Thoron

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

While the ethics of the American judiciary cover a broad spectrum, both good and bad, the general over-all level of judicial ethical performance is relatively high. Most judges are honest and honorable. Where dissatisfaction is apparent, it is far more frequently directed at judicial competence than at judicial integrity and ethics. Corruption, dishonesty, susceptibility to political pressure, and other ethical lapses are, however, not unknown, and on very rare occasions have been extremely bad. The ethical obligations of the judiciary extend far beyond the basic essentials of honesty, impartiality, and fairness. Judges must not only avoid evil or wrongdoing, but …