Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (10)
- Columbia Law School (9)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (9)
- University of North Florida (9)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (9)
-
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (8)
- American University Washington College of Law (7)
- University of Colorado Law School (7)
- University of Michigan Law School (6)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (6)
- Washington University in St. Louis (6)
- Cornell University Law School (5)
- Duke Law (5)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (5)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (5)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (5)
- University of Richmond (5)
- University of South Carolina (5)
- Fordham Law School (4)
- Georgetown University Law Center (4)
- Pace University (4)
- Valparaiso University (4)
- Penn State Law (3)
- SIT Graduate Institute/SIT Study Abroad (3)
- St. John's University School of Law (3)
- University of Baltimore Law (3)
- University of Miami Law School (3)
- University of Washington School of Law (3)
- Western New England University School of Law (3)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (3)
- Keyword
-
- Civil rights (30)
- Discrimination (28)
- Race (20)
- Title VII (18)
- Civil Rights (12)
-
- Employment discrimination (11)
- Racial discrimination (11)
- Gender (10)
- Women (10)
- Racism (9)
- Equal protection (8)
- Equality (8)
- Rodney Lawrence (8)
- Rodney Lawrence Hurst (8)
- Same-sex marriage (8)
- Sr. Papers; Hurst (8)
- Sr.; Hurst (8)
- Constitutional Law (6)
- Constitutional law (6)
- Employment (6)
- Human rights (6)
- Race discrimination (6)
- Civil Rights Act of 1964 (5)
- Equal Protection Clause (5)
- Judges (5)
- Marriage (5)
- Privacy (5)
- Rodney L.; African Americans--Civil Rights--Florida--Jacksonville--History--20th century--Sources; Jacksonville (5)
- Sexual orientation (5)
- Affirmative action (4)
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (38)
- Faculty Publications (21)
- All Faculty Scholarship (18)
- Articles (18)
- Faculty Articles (9)
-
- Scholarly Works (9)
- Law Faculty Publications (8)
- Textual material from the Rodney Lawrence Hurst, Sr. Papers (8)
- Publications (7)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (6)
- Scholarship@WashULaw (6)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (5)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (4)
- Journal Articles (4)
- Court Briefs (3)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (3)
- Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection (3)
- Book Chapters (2)
- Book Reviews (2)
- Faculty Articles and Other Publications (2)
- Faculty Articles and Papers (2)
- Fred T. Korematsu Center for Law and Equality (2)
- Human Rights Institute (2)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (2)
- Scholarly Articles (2)
- UF Law Faculty Publications (2)
- UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship (2)
- All Faculty Publications (1)
- Amicus Briefs (1)
- Articles & Chapters (1)
Articles 211 - 213 of 213
Full-Text Articles in Law
Drug Testing Students In California – Does It Violate The State Constitution?, Floralynn Einesman
Drug Testing Students In California – Does It Violate The State Constitution?, Floralynn Einesman
Faculty Scholarship
The Department of Education has granted federal funds to California school districts for the purpose of initiating and maintaining drug-testing programs for students and volunteers involved in athletics and extracurricular activities, yet no California court has fully examined these programs to determine their validity under the California Constitution. Before any additional California schools adopt drug-testing programs, the legality of these programs should be examined under the California Constitution. This Article seeks to accomplish that task. Part II summarizes the United States Supreme Court decisions on student drug testing. Part III examines state law on student drug testing. Part IV focuses …
A Tale Of Two Paradigms: Judicial Review And Judicial Duty, Philip A. Hamburger
A Tale Of Two Paradigms: Judicial Review And Judicial Duty, Philip A. Hamburger
Faculty Scholarship
What is the role of judges in holding government acts unconstitutional? The conventional paradigm is "judicial review." From this perspective, judges have a distinct power to review statutes and other government acts for their constitutionality. The historical evidence, however, reveals another paradigm, that of judicial duty. From this point of view, presented in my book Law and Judicial Duty, a judge has an office or duty, in all decisions, to exercise judgment in accord with the law of the land. On this understanding, there is no distinct power to review acts for their constitutionality, and what is called "judicial review" …
Significant Statistics: The Unwitting Policy Making Of Mathematically Ignorant Judges, Michael I. Meyerson, William Meyerson
Significant Statistics: The Unwitting Policy Making Of Mathematically Ignorant Judges, Michael I. Meyerson, William Meyerson
All Faculty Scholarship
This article will explore several areas in which judges, hampered by their mathematical ignorance, have permitted numerical analysis to subvert the goals of our legal system. In Part II, I will examine the perversion of the presumption of innocence in paternity cases, where courts make the counter-factual assumption that regardless of the evidence, prior to DNA testing, a suspect has a 50/50 chance of being the father. In Part III, I will explore the unnecessary injection of race into trials involving the statistics of DNA matching, even when race is entirely irrelevant to the particular case. Next, in Part IV, …