Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- William & Mary Law School (11)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (6)
- Florida International University College of Law (3)
- Singapore Management University (3)
- University of Michigan Law School (3)
-
- American University Washington College of Law (2)
- Brooklyn Law School (2)
- Golden Gate University School of Law (2)
- Penn State Law (2)
- University of Baltimore Law (2)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (2)
- University of Missouri School of Law (2)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (2)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (2)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Duke Law (1)
- Georgetown University Law Center (1)
- Georgia State University College of Law (1)
- Southern Methodist University (1)
- UIC School of Law (1)
- University of Denver (1)
- University of Georgia School of Law (1)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (1)
- University of Massachusetts School of Law (1)
- University of Miami Law School (1)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (1)
- University of Richmond (1)
- University of Tennessee College of Law (1)
- University of Tulsa College of Law (1)
- University of Washington School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Evidence (25)
- Confrontation Clause (3)
- Federal Rules of Evidence (3)
- Hearsay (3)
- Testimony (3)
-
- Admissibility (2)
- Arrest (2)
- Civil procedure (2)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (2)
- Criminal law (2)
- Criminal law and procedure (2)
- DNA (2)
- Discovery (2)
- Exclusionary rule (2)
- Fourth amendment (2)
- Impeachment of Witnesses (2)
- Jurisdiction (2)
- Litigation, alternative dispute resolution, and remedies (2)
- Online Social Networks (2)
- Scientific evidence (2)
- Search and seizure (2)
- United States Supreme Court (2)
- 4-4.6 (1)
- 4th amendment (1)
- Adjudicative facts (1)
- Adoption (1)
- Adult children (1)
- Antitrust (1)
- Bioscience (1)
- Blame (1)
- Publication
-
- Faculty Publications (10)
- Articles (6)
- Faculty Working Papers (6)
- Popular Media (6)
- Faculty Scholarship (4)
-
- Journal Articles (3)
- Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law (3)
- All Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (2)
- Faculty Articles and Other Publications (2)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (2)
- Publications (2)
- Working Paper Series (2)
- Architecture Faculty Articles (1)
- Articles, Chapters in Books and Other Contributions to Scholarly Works (1)
- College of Law Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (1)
- Faculty Publications By Year (1)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (1)
- Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Maryland Law Review Online (1)
- Scholarly Works (1)
- Sturm College of Law: Faculty Scholarship (1)
- UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (1)
- W&M Law Student Publications (1)
Articles 61 - 64 of 64
Full-Text Articles in Law
Antitrust Review Of The At&T/T-Mobile Transaction, Maurice E. Stucke, Allen Grunes
Antitrust Review Of The At&T/T-Mobile Transaction, Maurice E. Stucke, Allen Grunes
College of Law Faculty Scholarship
In this Essay, we review AT&T Inc.’s proposed $39 billion acquisition of T-Mobile USA, Inc., under federal merger law, under the U.S. Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission’s 2010 Horizontal Merger Guidelines, and with a focus on possible remedies. We find, under a rule of law approach, that the proposed acquisition is presumptively anticompetitive, and the merging parties in their public disclosures have failed to overcome this presumption. Next we find that under the Merger Guidelines, there is reason to believe that the transaction may result in higher prices to consumers under several different plausible theories. Finally, we turn …
Hanging On By A Thread: The Exclusionary Rule (Or What's Left Of It) Lives For Another Day, David A. Moran
Hanging On By A Thread: The Exclusionary Rule (Or What's Left Of It) Lives For Another Day, David A. Moran
Articles
Back when there was a Soviet Union, foreign intelligence officers would anxiously await the May Day parade in Moscow to see who would be standing next to the chairman of the Communist Party and who would be missing from the reviewing platform altogether. Since the Soviet government and the statecontrolled press published very little about what was really going on in the halls of state power, this was considered the most reliable way to determine who was in or out of favor and, by extension, how the domestic and foreign policies of the world's second most powerful country were likely …
Who Must Testify To The Results Of A Forensic Laboratory Test? Bullcoming V. New Mexico, Richard D. Friedman
Who Must Testify To The Results Of A Forensic Laboratory Test? Bullcoming V. New Mexico, Richard D. Friedman
Articles
Does the Confrontation Clause permit the prosecution to introduce a forensic laboratory report through the in-court testimony of a supervisor or other person who did not perform or observe the reported test?
Potential Responses To The Melendez-Diaz Line Of Cases, Richard D. Friedman
Potential Responses To The Melendez-Diaz Line Of Cases, Richard D. Friedman
Articles
Criminal prosecution is increasingly dependent on proof of the results of forensic laboratory tests. They are used, for example, to prove that a given substance contains cocaine; the prove what a driver’s blood alcohol content was; and to demonstrate that the DNA profile of some substance found at the crime scene matches that of the accused.
In Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, 129 S.Ct. 2527 (2009), the United States Supreme Court resolved a question that had divided the lower courts in the wake of Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004). The Melendez-Diaz Court held by a 5-4 vote that forensic laboratory …