Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Pace University (21)
- University of Colorado Law School (14)
- William & Mary Law School (10)
- University of Michigan Law School (7)
- Southern Methodist University (6)
-
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (6)
- St. John's University School of Law (3)
- University of Missouri School of Law (3)
- Washington University in St. Louis (3)
- Boston University School of Law (2)
- Roger Williams University (2)
- SJ Quinney College of Law, University of Utah (2)
- University of Baltimore Law (2)
- University of Kentucky (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Columbia Law School (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Georgetown University Law Center (1)
- Sacred Heart University (1)
- University of Maine School of Law (1)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (1)
- University of Richmond (1)
- Wayne State University (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (21)
- Faculty Publications (15)
- Publications (14)
- All Faculty Scholarship (8)
- Articles (7)
-
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (6)
- Faculty Scholarship (4)
- Scholarship@WashULaw (3)
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (2)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (2)
- Popular Media (2)
- Utah Law Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (1)
- Criminal Justice Faculty Publications (1)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (1)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (1)
- Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Law Faculty Research Publications (1)
- Reviews (1)
Articles 91 - 93 of 93
Full-Text Articles in Law
The "Perjury Trap", Bennett L. Gershman
The "Perjury Trap", Bennett L. Gershman
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
It is the aim of the present Article, first, to explore the boundaries of legitimate grand jury interrogation as it bears on the subject of perjury and, second, to formulate guidelines that strike a balance between the needs of the investigatory process and the rights of witnesses.
Prosecutorial Discretion, Plea Bargaining And The Supreme Court's Opinion In Bordenkircher V. Hayes, William T. Pizzi
Prosecutorial Discretion, Plea Bargaining And The Supreme Court's Opinion In Bordenkircher V. Hayes, William T. Pizzi
Publications
No abstract provided.
Presuming Lawyers Competent To Protect Fundamental Rights: Is It An Affordable Fiction?, Robert G. Lawson
Presuming Lawyers Competent To Protect Fundamental Rights: Is It An Affordable Fiction?, Robert G. Lawson
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
This article explores the ramifications of Wainwright v. Sykes, a case decided before the Supreme Court of the United States in 1977. The broad question before the Court in Sykes concerned the extent to which state prisoners should have access to federal court by use of the writ of habeas corpus. The narrow issue before the Court concerned the impact on a prisoner's claim for habeas relief of procedural defaults (such as a failure to object to evidence, a failure to perfect an appeal, etc.) that occur in the state proceeding under attack. In considering these important issues Justice …