Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (12)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (10)
- American University Washington College of Law (8)
- William & Mary Law School (7)
- Columbia Law School (6)
-
- Southern Methodist University (6)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (5)
- Barry University School of Law (4)
- Pace University (4)
- University of Colorado Law School (4)
- University of Michigan Law School (4)
- University of the Pacific (4)
- Brooklyn Law School (3)
- Cornell University Law School (3)
- Montclair State University (3)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (3)
- University of Georgia School of Law (3)
- Wayne State University (3)
- Duke Law (2)
- Emory University School of Law (2)
- Florida State University College of Law (2)
- Georgia State University College of Law (2)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (2)
- Roger Williams University (2)
- SIT Graduate Institute/SIT Study Abroad (2)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (2)
- University of Baltimore Law (2)
- University of Kentucky (2)
- University of Missouri School of Law (2)
- University of Tulsa College of Law (2)
- Keyword
-
- Criminal procedure (17)
- Criminal law (9)
- Sixth Amendment (9)
- Capital punishment (8)
- Criminal Procedure (7)
-
- Death penalty (7)
- Fourth Amendment (7)
- Sentencing (7)
- Jury (6)
- Criminal Law (5)
- Due process (5)
- Eighth Amendment (5)
- Evidence (5)
- Juries (5)
- Plea bargaining (5)
- Race (5)
- Police (4)
- Constitution (3)
- Criminal Justice (3)
- Criminal justice (3)
- Criminal justice reform (3)
- Criminal justice system (3)
- Democracy (3)
- Hearsay (3)
- Judges (3)
- Legal education (3)
- Mass incarceration (3)
- Poverty (3)
- Punishment (3)
- Testimony (3)
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (20)
- All Faculty Scholarship (18)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (12)
- Faculty Publications (9)
- Articles (7)
-
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (6)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (6)
- Scholarly Works (5)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (4)
- McGeorge School of Law Scholarly Articles (4)
- Publications (4)
- Department of Justice Studies Faculty Scholarship and Creative Works (3)
- Journal Articles (3)
- Law Faculty Research Publications (3)
- NULR Online (3)
- Reports (3)
- Scholarly Articles (3)
- Articles & Book Chapters (2)
- Articles, Chapters in Books and Other Contributions to Scholarly Works (2)
- Cornell Law Faculty Working Papers (2)
- Faculty Articles (2)
- Faculty Publications By Year (2)
- Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection (2)
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (2)
- Scholarly Publications (2)
- All Faculty Publications (1)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Department of Psychology: Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Articles and Other Publications (1)
Articles 31 - 60 of 153
Full-Text Articles in Law
Gideon V. Wainwright--From A 1963 Perspective, Jerold H. Israel
Gideon V. Wainwright--From A 1963 Perspective, Jerold H. Israel
Articles
Gideon v. Wainwright is more than a “landmark” Supreme Court ruling in the field of constitutional criminal procedure. As evidenced by the range of celebrators of Gideon’s Fiftieth Anniversary (extending far beyond the legal academy) and Gideon’s inclusion in the basic coverage of high school government courses, Gideon today is an icon of the American justice system. I have no quarrel with that iconic status, but I certainly did not see any such potential in Gideon when I analyzed the Court’s ruling shortly after it was announced in March of 1963. I had previously agreed to write an article for …
Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel Before Powell V. Alabama: Lessons From History For The Future Of The Right To Counsel, Sara Mayeux
All Faculty Scholarship
The doctrinal literature on ineffective assistance of counsel typically begins with the 1932 Supreme Court case of Powell v. Alabama. This symposium contribution goes back farther, locating the IAC doctrine’s origins in a series of state cases from the 1880s through the 1920s. At common law, the traditional agency rule held that counsel incompetence was never grounds for a new trial. Between the 1880s and the 1920s, state appellate judges chipped away at that rule, developing a more flexible doctrine that allowed appellate courts to reverse criminal convictions in cases where, because of egregious attorney ineptitude, there was reason …
Systemic Barriers To Effective Assistance Of Counsel In Plea Bargaining, Rodney J. Uphoff, Peter A. Joy
Systemic Barriers To Effective Assistance Of Counsel In Plea Bargaining, Rodney J. Uphoff, Peter A. Joy
Faculty Publications
In a trio of recent cases, Padilla v. Kentucky, Missouri v. Frye, and Lafler v. Cooper, the U.S. Supreme Court has focused its attention on defense counsel's pivotal role during the plea bargaining process . At the same time that the Court has signaled its willingness to consider ineffective assistance of counsel claims at the plea stage, prosecutors are increasingly requiring defendants to sign waivers that include waiving all constitutional and procedural errors, even unknown ineffective assistance of counsel claims such as those that proved successful in Padilla and Frye. Had Jose Padilla and Galin Frye been forced to sign …
Trial By Google: Judicial Notice In The Information Age, Jeffrey Bellin, Andrew Guthrie Ferguson
Trial By Google: Judicial Notice In The Information Age, Jeffrey Bellin, Andrew Guthrie Ferguson
Faculty Publications
This Article presents a theory of judicial notice for the information age. It argues that the ease of accessing factual data on the Internet allows judges and litigants to expand the use of judicial notice in ways that raise significant concerns about admissibility, reliability, and fair process. State and federal courts are already applying the surprisingly pliant judicial notice rules to bring websites ranging from Google Maps to Wikipedia into the courtroom, and these decisions will only increase in frequency in coming years. This rapidly emerging judicial phenomenon is notable for its ad hoc and conclusory nature—attributes that have the …
Summary Of Conner V. State Of Nevada, 130 Nev. Adv. Op. 49, Kelsey Bernstein
Summary Of Conner V. State Of Nevada, 130 Nev. Adv. Op. 49, Kelsey Bernstein
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
The Court determined three issues: 1) whether, despite there being sufficient evidence to sustain a conviction, the conviction may stand where the State engages in discriminatory jury selection; 2) how a convicted defendant may sufficiently demonstrate that it is more likely than not that the State engaged in purposeful discrimination; and 3) the responsibilities of the district court when ruling on a Batson objection.
Not All Women Are Mothers: Addressing The Invisibility Of Women Under The Control Of The Criminal Justice System Who Do Not Have Children, Venezia Michalsen, Jeanne Flavin
Not All Women Are Mothers: Addressing The Invisibility Of Women Under The Control Of The Criminal Justice System Who Do Not Have Children, Venezia Michalsen, Jeanne Flavin
Department of Justice Studies Faculty Scholarship and Creative Works
Research has consistently shown that most women under the control of the criminal justice system are mothers. The robustness of this finding has been accompanied by a failure to consider the characteristics and needs of women without children. In this study, we examine data on 1,334 formerly incarcerated women. Findings indicate that while mothers and non-mothers share some characteristics, they differ on several others, most notably demographic profile, mental health, and timing of contacts with the criminal justice system. These results suggest a need to recognize the diversity among women offender groups, particularly when developing policies and programs need.
Summary Of Harris V. State, 130 Nev. Adv. Op. 47, Danielle Barraza
Summary Of Harris V. State, 130 Nev. Adv. Op. 47, Danielle Barraza
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
The Court determined whether a motion to withdraw a guilty plea filed after the judgment of conviction is a remedy that is “incident to the proceedings in the trial court.”
Summary Of All Star Bail Bonds, Inc. V. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 130 Nev. Adv. Op. 45, Sean Daly
Summary Of All Star Bail Bonds, Inc. V. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 130 Nev. Adv. Op. 45, Sean Daly
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
A defendant who left the country voluntarily, but was denied admission upon returning to the country, is considered “excluded,” not “deported,” for purposes of NRS 178.509(1)(b)(5). Furthermore, a district court may not exonerate a bond without a statutory basis for doing so.
Smooth And Bumpy Laws, Adam Kolber
The Criminal Court Audience In A Post-Trial World, Jocelyn Simonson
The Criminal Court Audience In A Post-Trial World, Jocelyn Simonson
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Summary Of Afzali V. State, 130 Nev. Adv. Op. 34, Sean Daly
Summary Of Afzali V. State, 130 Nev. Adv. Op. 34, Sean Daly
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
The Court determined whether a defendant has a constitutional right to know the racial composition of a grand jury that indicted him.
Summary Of Gomez V. State, 130 Nev. Adv. Op. 43, Laura Guidry
Summary Of Gomez V. State, 130 Nev. Adv. Op. 43, Laura Guidry
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
The Court determined two issues: 1) whether the district court properly relied on the incident reports when determining whether to amend the PSI 2) whether a defendant is entitled to due process protections when erroneous statements in his or her PSI will potentially affect his or her prison classification and compromise whether he or she will be released on parole.
Summary Of Sasser V. State, 130 Nev. Adv. Op. 41, Jeffrey Pike
Summary Of Sasser V. State, 130 Nev. Adv. Op. 41, Jeffrey Pike
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
The Court determined three issues: 1) whether a district court can amend a presentence investigation report (PSI) in the judgment of conviction rather than amending the PSI itself; 2) whether the district court properly declined to strike information from the PSI; and 3) whether the district court relied on impalpable or highly suspect evidence when sentencing the defendant.
Choice Of Counsel And The Appearance Of Equal Justice Under Law, Wesley M. Oliver
Choice Of Counsel And The Appearance Of Equal Justice Under Law, Wesley M. Oliver
NULR Online
No abstract provided.
Abidor V. Napolitano: Suspicionless Cell Phone And Laptop “Strip” Searches At The Border Compromise The Fourth And First Amendments, Adam Lamparello, Charles E. Maclean
Abidor V. Napolitano: Suspicionless Cell Phone And Laptop “Strip” Searches At The Border Compromise The Fourth And First Amendments, Adam Lamparello, Charles E. Maclean
NULR Online
No abstract provided.
Flawed Coalitions And The Politics Of Crime, David Jaros
Flawed Coalitions And The Politics Of Crime, David Jaros
All Faculty Scholarship
Bipartisanship can be dangerous. In the late 1970s, liberal and conservative forces united to discard two centuries of federal sentencing practice and usher in an era of fixed guidelines that would reshape the criminal justice landscape. In the decades that followed, liberals would come to bitterly regret their alliance with conservative sentencing reformers. The guideline regime established by the Sentencing Reform Act ultimately advanced hardline conservative criminal justice goals that were antithetical to the objectives of many of the Act’s former liberal supporters.
Researchers have shown that a particular cognitive bias — cultural cognition — can explain why intense partisan …
Sharing Public Safety Helicopters, Henry H. Perritt Jr.
Sharing Public Safety Helicopters, Henry H. Perritt Jr.
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Student’S Crime Data Research Attracts National Ethics Symposium Attention, Kim Hill
Student’S Crime Data Research Attracts National Ethics Symposium Attention, Kim Hill
News and Events
No abstract provided.
Introduction To The Symposium On Child Witnesses In Sexual Abuse Cases, Carl T. Bogus
Introduction To The Symposium On Child Witnesses In Sexual Abuse Cases, Carl T. Bogus
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Truth Stories: Credibility Determinations At The Illinois Torture Inquiry And Relief Commission, 45 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 1085 (2014), Kim D. Chanbonpin
Truth Stories: Credibility Determinations At The Illinois Torture Inquiry And Relief Commission, 45 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 1085 (2014), Kim D. Chanbonpin
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
This is the first scholarly Article to investigate the inner workings of the Illinois Torture Inquiry and Relief Commission (“TIRC”). The TIRC was established by statute in 2009 to provide legal redress for victims of police torture. Prisoners who claim that their convictions were based on confessions coerced by police torture can utilize the procedures available at the TIRC to obtain judicial review of their cases. For those who have exhausted all appeals and post-conviction remedies, the TIRC represents the tantalizing promise of justice long denied. To be eligible for relief, however, the claimant must first meet the TIRC’s strict …
The Great Writ Hit: The Curtailment Of Habeas Corpus In Georgia Since 1967, Donald E. Wilkes Jr.
The Great Writ Hit: The Curtailment Of Habeas Corpus In Georgia Since 1967, Donald E. Wilkes Jr.
Scholarly Works
A welcome development, the landmark Georgia Habeas Corpus Act of 1967 modernized and vastly expanded the availability of postconviction habeas corpus relief in the Georgia court system. Since the early 1970s, however, there has been an unfortunate trend of imposing crippling restrictions on use of the Georgia writ of habeas corpus to obtain postconviction relief. Six restrictive Georgia habeas statutes, enacted between 1973 and 2004, have, among other things, reduced the number of claims which may be asserted in postconviction habeas proceedings, curtailed appeals of postconviction habeas decisions denying relief, and created a maze of procedural barriers to obtaining postconviction …
Teaching The Methods Of White-Collar Practice: Investigatios, Roger Fairfax
Teaching The Methods Of White-Collar Practice: Investigatios, Roger Fairfax
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
When Ijoined the George Washington University Law School [GW] faculty after practice as a federal prosecutor and white-collar criminal defense attorney, I quickly learned that a GW law student interested in exploring white-collar crime had a great many courses from which to choose. Several of my full-time colleagues teach courses that cover various topics relevant to white-collar crime, including a computer crimes course, a course in criminal tax litigation, and courses on anti-corruption in government contracting and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act [FCPA]. GW is also fortunate to have a dedicated and talented adjunct faculty, which includes a former senior …
"Not Just A Common Criminal": The Case For Sentencing Mitigation Videos, Regina Austin
"Not Just A Common Criminal": The Case For Sentencing Mitigation Videos, Regina Austin
All Faculty Scholarship
Sentencing mitigation or sentencing videos are a form of visual legal advocacy that is produced on behalf of defendants for use in the sentencing phases of criminal cases (from charging to clemency). The videos are typically short (5 to 10 minutes or so) nonfiction films that explore a defendant’s background, character, and family situation with the aim of raising factual and moral issues that support the argument for a shorter or more lenient sentence. Very few examples of mitigation videos are in the public domain and available for viewing. This article provides a complete analysis of the constituent elements of …
Targeted Killing: United States Policy, Constitional Law, And Due Process, Mark Febrizio
Targeted Killing: United States Policy, Constitional Law, And Due Process, Mark Febrizio
Senior Honors Theses
The increased incorporation of targeted killing, primarily through the use of unmanned aerial vehicles, into United States policy raises salient questions regarding its consistency with the U.S. Constitution. This paper contrasts interpretations of constitutional due process with the current legal framework for conducting targeted killing operations. The Fifth Amendment to the Constitution establishes the due process owed to U.S. citizens. This paper determines that the killing of Anwar al-Awlaki, an American citizen, was accomplished in a manner inconsistent with constitutional due process and demonstrates an over-extension of executive branch power. This paper examines one scholarly recommendation that seeks to increase …
The Effects Of Verbal Overshadowing And Social Anxiety On Facial Recognition: A Replication And Extension, Arielle Rancourt
The Effects Of Verbal Overshadowing And Social Anxiety On Facial Recognition: A Replication And Extension, Arielle Rancourt
Honors College
There have been 314 post-conviction DNA exonerations, and about 70% of these wrongful convictions were due to witness misidentification. Many factors affect the accuracy of a witness’s testimony, including the concept of “verbal overshadowing,” in which the verbal reporting of a visual memory interferes with the subsequent recognition of the visual stimuli. The present study seeks to replicate Jonathan Schooler’s original findings with regard to this phenomenon (Schooler & Engstler-Schooler, 1990). The first experiment is focused on verbalizing a visual memory that is particularly hard to put into words: the memory of a face. The hypothesis for both the original …
Summary Of Coleman V. State, 130 Nev. Adv. Op. 22, Kylee Gloeckner
Summary Of Coleman V. State, 130 Nev. Adv. Op. 22, Kylee Gloeckner
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
The Court determined whether a person who is serving a sentence of lifetime supervision may challenge that sentence by filing a post-conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Summary written by Kylee Gloeckner.
Summary Of Davis V. State, 130 Nev. Adv. Op. 16, Danielle Barraza
Summary Of Davis V. State, 130 Nev. Adv. Op. 16, Danielle Barraza
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
The Court clarified two issues: [1] whether battery is justifiable in self-defense under the same conditions that would justify homicide, and [2] when proposed jury instructions should be accepted by the trial court regarding justifiable battery.
Pretrial Detention And The Right To Be Monitored, Samuel R. Wiseman
Pretrial Detention And The Right To Be Monitored, Samuel R. Wiseman
Scholarly Publications
Although detention for dangerousness has received far more attention in recent years, a significant number of non-dangerous but impecunious defendants are jailed to ensure their presence at trial due to continued, widespread reliance on a money bail system. This Essay develops two related claims. First, in the near term, electronic monitoring will present a superior alternative to money bail for addressing flight risk. In contrast to previous proposals for reducing pretrial detention rates, electronic monitoring has the potential to reduce both fugitive rates (by allowing the defendant to be easily located) and government expenditures (by reducing the number of defendants …
Impeachment By Unreliable Conviction, Anna Roberts
Impeachment By Unreliable Conviction, Anna Roberts
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Street Diversion And Decarceration, Mary Fan
Street Diversion And Decarceration, Mary Fan
Articles
States seeking more cost-effective approaches than imprisoning drug offenders have explored innovations such as drug courts and deferred prosecution. These treatment-based programs generally involve giving diversion discretion to prosecutors and judges, actors further down the criminal processing chain than police. The important vantage of police at the gateway of entry into the criminal system has been underutilized. [para] The article explores developing the capacity of police to take a public health approach to drug offending by engaging in street diversion to treatment rather than criminal processing. This approach entails giving police therapeutic discretion—the power to sort who gets treatment rather …