Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (12)
- University of Michigan Law School (11)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (7)
- Columbia Law School (6)
- Cornell University Law School (5)
-
- Fordham Law School (4)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (4)
- BLR (3)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (3)
- William & Mary Law School (3)
- Boston University School of Law (2)
- Brooklyn Law School (2)
- Georgetown University Law Center (2)
- Notre Dame Law School (2)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (2)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (2)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (1)
- Duke Law (1)
- Florida International University College of Law (1)
- Georgia State University College of Law (1)
- Louisiana State University Law Center (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- New York Law School (1)
- Nova Southeastern University (1)
- Pace University (1)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (1)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (1)
- Southern Methodist University (1)
- Keyword
-
- Criminal Law and Procedure (9)
- Criminal procedure (8)
- United States Supreme Court (7)
- Criminal law (6)
- Famous Trials (6)
-
- Sixth Amendment (6)
- Trial (6)
- Criminal Procedure (5)
- Criminal justice (5)
- Admissibility (4)
- Confrontation Clause (4)
- Crawford v. Washington (4)
- Cross-examination (4)
- Evidence (4)
- Hearsay (4)
- Testimony (4)
- Capital Punishment (3)
- Davis v. Washington (3)
- Lawyers (3)
- Plea bargaining (3)
- Sentencing (3)
- Terrorism (3)
- Testimonial (3)
- Trials (3)
- Witnesses (3)
- Courts (2)
- Crime (2)
- DNA (2)
- Defendants (2)
- Due process (2)
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (20)
- Articles (12)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (11)
- All Faculty Scholarship (7)
- Faculty Works (7)
-
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (5)
- Faculty Publications (5)
- Journal Articles (3)
- Rutgers Law School (Newark) Faculty Papers (3)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (2)
- Scholarly Articles (2)
- Working Paper Series (2)
- All Faculty Publications (1)
- Articles & Chapters (1)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (1)
- Articles, Chapters in Books and Other Contributions to Scholarly Works (1)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (1)
- Faculty Law Review Articles (1)
- Faculty Publications By Year (1)
- Faculty Scholarly Works (1)
- Law & Economics Working Papers Archive: 2003-2009 (1)
- Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Presentations (1)
- Publications (1)
- Scholarly Works (1)
- War Crimes Memoranda (1)
Articles 91 - 95 of 95
Full-Text Articles in Law
Crawford, Davis, And Way Beyond, Richard D. Friedman
Crawford, Davis, And Way Beyond, Richard D. Friedman
Articles
Until 1965, the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution hardly mattered. It was not applicable against the states, and therefore had no role whatsoever in the vast majority of prosecutions. Moreover, if a federal court was inclined to exclude evidence of an out-of-court statement, it made little practical difference whether the court termed the statement hearsay or held that the evidence did not comply with the Confrontation Clause.
Forfeiture Of The Confrontation Right After Crawford And Davis, Richard D. Friedman
Forfeiture Of The Confrontation Right After Crawford And Davis, Richard D. Friedman
Articles
So my topic this morning is on forfeiture of the confrontation right, which I think plays a central role in confrontation doctrine. And to try to present that, let me state the entirety of confrontation doctrine as briefly as I can. This is, at least, what I think the doctrine is and what it can be: A testimonial statement should not be admissible against an accused to prove the truth of what it asserts unless the accused either has had or will have an opportunity to confront the witness-which should occur at trial unless the witness is then unavailable-or has …
Crawford And Davis: A Personal Reflection, Richard D. Friedman
Crawford And Davis: A Personal Reflection, Richard D. Friedman
Articles
I have to say that when I stood up to argue Hammon I felt the wind at my back. I was basically a lawyer with an easy case, and there wasn't anything particularly unpredictable at the argument of Hammon. Now it got a little bit interesting, as I will explain later, because to a certain extent I was trying to argue the other case as well. But Hammon itself was sort of ordinary, normal law.
Beyond Mitigation: Towards A Theory Of Allocution, Kimberly A. Thomas
Beyond Mitigation: Towards A Theory Of Allocution, Kimberly A. Thomas
Articles
THE COURT: I don't think I have time to listen .... I am not going to reexamine your guilt or innocence here. That is not the purpose of a sentence.. THE DEFENDANT: I did not have the chance to tell you .... THE DEFENDANT: But, your Honor, listen to me-1 Should the court hear this defendant? Is the story of innocence relevant at allocution-the defendant's opportunity to speak on his or her own behalf at the sentencing hearing prior to the imposition of sentence? Or, is the purpose of allocution something different, as the judge suggests? The answers depend on …
Judging Untried Cases, Daniel C. Richman
Judging Untried Cases, Daniel C. Richman
Faculty Scholarship
That federal criminal trials are an endangered species is clear. During fiscal year 2004, only 4% (3346) of the 83,391 federal defendants in terminated cases went to trial. And, trends that Professor Ronald Wright highlights in his insightful article have continued past the end point of his data. In 1994, 4639 defendants obtained verdicts from juries and 1050 from judges; in 2003, just 2909 and 615, respectively, did so. Every time one thinks that the system has hit an equilibrium at some “natural” distribution, the trial rate goes down a bit more.