Law Commons^™

The Original Source Of The Cause Of Action In Federal Courts: The Example Of The Alien Tort Statute, Anthony J. Bellia, Bradford R. Clark

Anthony J. Bellia

Judges and scholars have long debated the legitimacy and contours of federal common law causes of action — actions created neither by Congress nor by state law. The question of federal judicial power to recognize federal common law causes of action arises in a range of contexts in the field of federal courts, including with respect to whether federal courts may recognize an implied right of action for the violation of a constitutional or statutory provision that does not specifically create one. Recently, the power of federal courts to recognize federal common law causes of action has emerged as a …

Supplemental Brief Of Professors Anthony J. Bellia Jr. And Bradford R. Clark As Amici Curiae In Support Of Respondents, Anthony J. Bellia, Bradford R. Clark

Anthony J. Bellia

From the Summary of Argument This case squarely presents the question whether ATS jurisdiction extends to claims solely between aliens. The plaintiffs and defendants are all aliens; no U.S. citizen or corporation has ever been a party to the case. Because the issue of party alignment under the ATS is a question of subject matter jurisdiction, the parties cannot waive it, and either the Court or a party may raise it anytime. And the question whether the ATS covers suits between aliens is likely to recur; indeed, the issue is squarely presented by the Ninth Circuit's recent ruling in Sarei …

Re-Examining Customary International Law And The Federal Courts: An Introduction, Anthony J. Bellia

Anthony J. Bellia

Legal scholars have debated intensely the role of customary international law in the American federal system. The debate involves serious questions surrounding the United States's constitutional structure, foreign relations, and human rights. Despite an impressive body of scholarship, the debate has stood at an impasse in recent years, without either side garnering a consensus. This symposium–Re-examining Customary International Law and the Federal Courts–aspires to help advance the debate over the status of customary international law in the federal courts.

The symposium received thoughtful and constructive contributions from Professors Curtis A. Bradley, Bradford R. Clark, Andrew Kent, Carlos M. Vizquez, and …

The Tortureres: Evaluating The Senate Select Intelligence Committee’S Torture Report And Assessing The Legal Liability Of “Company Y” In The Cia’S Post 9-11 Interrogation And Detention Program Under The Alien Tort Statute, David Satnarine

David Satnarine

The U.S. national security apparatus after September 11, 2001 engendered an emphasis of new forms of intelligence gathering. The U.S. Central Intelligence Agency, the United States and its agents sought to collect as much information as possible to prevent another attack on the homeland, and to bring to justice those responsible for the heinous acts of September 11, 2001. Through the use of private actors, corporate shells, and contractors, the United States employed a host of professional interrogators in its war on terror. Some of these private actors, through their corporate shells later become known as the architects of the …

The Judicial Expansion Of American Exceptionalism, Rachel Lopez

Rachel E. López

In the modern era, there is a growing sentiment that when the gravest human rights violations occur, the international community has a “responsibility to protect” the victims if the victims’ own government is unwilling or unable to do so. While much of the scholarship on the responsibility to protect focuses on the international community’s ability to engage in military intervention, the doctrine actually provides a menu of options that intervening States can employ to prevent serious abuses of human rights, including, notably for the purposes of this article, legal accountability in judicial fora. States thus have greater latitude than ever …

Sosa, Federal Question Jurisdiction, And Historical Fidelity, Anthony J. Bellia

Anthony J. Bellia

In his paper "International Human Rights in American Courts," Judge Fletcher concludes that Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain “has left us with more questions than answers.” Sosa attempted to adapt certain principles belonging to the "general law" to a post-Erie positivistic conception of common law while maintaining fidelity to certain historical expectations. “[I]t would be unreasonable,” the Court thought, “to assume that the First Congress would have expected federal courts to lose all capacity to recognize enforceable international norms simply because the common law might lose some metaphysical cachet on the road to modern realism.” The Court was unwilling, however, out …

The Federal Common Law Of Nations, Anthony J. Bellia, Bradford R. Clark

Anthony J. Bellia

Courts and scholars have vigorously debated the proper role of customary international law in American courts: To what extent should it be considered federal common law, state law, or general law? The debate has reached something of an impasse, in part because various positions rely on, but also are in tension with, historical practice and constitutional structure. This Article describes the role that the law of nations actually has played throughout American history. In keeping with the original constitutional design, federal courts for much of that history enforced certain rules respecting other nations' perfect rights (or close analogues) under the …

The Alien Tort Statute And The Law Of Nations, Bradford R. Clark, Anthony J. Bellia Jr.

Anthony J. Bellia

Courts and scholars have struggled to identify the original meaning of the Alien Tort Statute (ATS). As enacted in 1789, the ATS provided "[t]hat the district courts... shall... have cognizance... of all causes where an alien sues for a tort only in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the United States." The statute was rarely invoked for almost two centuries until, in the 1980s, lower federal courts began reading the statute expansively to allow foreign citizens to sue other foreign citizens for violations of modern customary international law that occurred outside the United States. In 2004 …

Recalibrating After Kiobel: Evaluating The Utility Of The Racketeer Influenced And Corrupt Organizations Act In Litigating Corporate Abuse, Julian Simcock

Julian Simcock

This analysis seeks to explore the un-examined question of whether RICO could one day become a useful surrogate for the Alien Tort Statute (ATS) in litigating against international corporate abuses. Decades after the ATS had become a robust tool for bringing claims for international violations in U.S. courts, the Second Circuit recently ruled in Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum that corporations cannot be held liable for torts in violation of the law of nations under the ATS. Rulings by the D.C Circuit and the Seventh Circuit quickly breathed new life into the debate, and the circuit split is now destined …

Stepping Away From The Abyss? Will The Supreme Court Preclude Extraterritorial Application Of The Alien Tort Statute?, Richard O. Faulk

Richard Faulk

Policymakers find themselves increasingly occupied with ATS claims arising from conduct that occurred in other countries and which has no significant connection to the United States — claims that may not be consistent with our own government’s policies for promoting human rights. Although this issue of “extraterritorial” application has been inherent in every ATS case that has involved injuries caused by foreign corporations outside the United States, it has evaded review in every instance, and — until the Supreme Court heard arguments recently in Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum — it appeared that the proliferation of ATS cases in that …

Human Rights Compliance And Accountability For U.S. Multinational Enterprises: A Principled Step Forward After Sosa And Kiobel, Paul Regan

Paul L Regan

This article proposes a Congressional statutory solution to resolve when a multinational corporation can be liable under the Alien Tort Statute on a claim for human rights abuses arising from a corporation’s overseas business operations. Under this proposal a U.S. multinational would be directly liable for human rights violations of its overseas subsidiary where it (1) failed to ensure that its overseas subsidiary had in place a reasonably effective and functioning human rights compliance system or (2) acquired knowledge of ongoing human rights violations by its overseas subsidiary and failed to take meaningful corrective measures in a timely way.

In Search Of A Forum For The Families Of The Guantanamo Disappeared, Peter Honigsberg

Peter J Honigsberg

The United States government has committed grave human rights violations by disappearing people during the past decade into the detention camps in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. And for nearly thirty years, beginning with a 1983 decision from a case arising in Uruguay, there has been a well-developed body of international law establishing that parents, wives and children of the disappeared suffer torture, or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment (CID).

This paper argues that the rights of family members were severely violated when their loved ones were disappeared into Guantanamo. Family members of men disappeared by the United States have legitimate claims …

Holding Corporations To Account. Crafting Ats Suits In The Uk?, Simon J. Baughen

Simon J Baughen

The traditional province of international law is in the regulation of relations between States. However, with the tribunals at Nuremberg and Tokyo established at the end of the second world war, for the first time it became possible for individuals to incur criminal liability in respect of violation of a core of norms of customary international law, such as the prohibitions on war crimes and crimes against humanity. This process has continued with the UN’s establishment in the 1993 and 1994 of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (‘ICTY’) and the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (‘ICTR’) respectively, …

Unfinished Business: Reconciling The Apartheid Reparation Litigation With South Africa’S Truth And Reconciliation Commission, Julian Simcock

Julian Simcock

Critics have argued that allowing the Apartheid reparation litigation to continue would subvert what South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission sought to achieve. A more complete review of the history of the Commission, the nature of corporate participation, and the narrow realm in which the Alien Tort Statute can be applied, however, reveals that the Apartheid reparation litigation is, in fact, consistent with the original intentions of South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission.

Whether Foreigner Or Alien: A New Look At The Original Language Of The Alien Tort Statute, M. Anderson Berry

M. Anderson Berry

Until now, the word that puts the ‘A’ in ATS has been completely overlooked. No court or commentator has delved in to the 1789 meaning of “alien,” or to the drafters' understanding of and possible intentions behind that word.

In the Supreme Court’s only opinion regarding the Alien Tort Statute, Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain, the Court unanimously agreed that although the first House of Representatives modified the Senate’s draft of what eventually became the Judiciary Act of 1789, it made hardly any changes to the provisions on aliens, including what became the ATS. The Court did not point out any of …

Torture, American Style: A Recipe For Civil Tort Immunity, Matthew J. Jowanna

Matthew J. Jowanna

If someone is tortured, surely, at a minimum, an intentional tort has been committed against that person. This article specifically addresses the civil tort remedy, or lack thereof, for victims of torture at the hands of employees of the United States. In ratifying the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, and in its subsequent reporting to the United Nations Committee Against Torture, the United States has consistently denounced torture and proclaimed itself to be a nation that provides for civil remedies against torturers. However, this article will draw attention to the hypocrisy and self-protection …

Balancing Judicial Cognizance And Caution: Whether Transnational Corporations Are Liable For Foreign Bribery Under The Alien Tort Statute, Matt A. Vega

Matt A Vega

This article argues that transnational corporate bribery is actionable under the Alien Tort Statute of 1789 (ATS) as a violation of the law of nations. In the early years of the Republic, bribery of a foreign official was commonly understood to violate the law of nations. Today, bribery is occasionally mentioned in passing as a precursor to human rights violations, but the bribe itself is seldom analyzed as a potential violation of the law of nations. However, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals recently allowed “aiding and abetting” to proceed as a customary international law violation under the ATS in …

Plural Vision: International Law Seen Through The Varied Lenses Of Domestic Implementation, D. A. Jeremy Telman

D. A. Jeremy Telman

This essay introduces a collection of essays that have evolved from papers presented at a conference on “International Law in the Domestic Context.” The conference was a response to the questions raised by the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Medellín v. Texas and also a product of our collective curiosity about how other states address tensions between international obligations and overlapping regimes of national law.

Our constitutional tradition speaks with many voices on the subject of the relationship between domestic and international law. In order to gain a broader perspective on that relationship, we invited experts on foreign law to …

State Immunity And Jus Cogens Violations: The Alien Tort Statute Against The Backdrop Of The Latest Developments In The ‘Law Of Nations’, Michele Potestà

Michele Potestà

No abstract provided.

The Clash Of Obligations: Exercising Extraterritorial Jurisdiction In Conformance With Transitional Justice, Christen L. Broecker

Christen L Broecker

With growing frequency, courts in the United States and Europe have been placed in the unenviable position of being asked to weigh the dictates of international criminal and human rights law against the risk that enforcing that law may ignite conflict or threaten the stability of fragile governments abroad. These States have increasingly authorized the use of extraterritorial jurisdiction to allow their courts to adjudicate civil and criminal and civil disputes stemming from major human rights atrocities committed abroad. Yet as a result, their courts have been confronted with the dilemma of how to enforce the dictates of international criminal …

The Liberalizing Effects Of Tort: How Corporate Complicity Liability Under The Alien Tort Statute Advances Constructive Engagement , Richard Herz

Richard Herz

Does allowing U.S. corporations to evade liability for abetting human rights abuses such as genocide or torture ultimately promote democratic reform in countries with repressive regimes? In suits recently filed under the Alien Tort Statute (ATS), the Bush Administration has claimed that it does. It has filed briefs opposing liability, asserting that liability would limit the U.S. government’s ability to adopt a “constructive engagement” policy of using U.S. private sector investment to promote democracy and human rights. This Article challenges the Administration’s position.

The Administration’s argument has inserted the long-running policy debate regarding the efficacy of “constructive engagement” into the …

Genocide And Jurisdiction: Methods For Achieving Justice Domestically For The International Crimes In Darfur, Matthew N. Thomas

Matthew N. Thomas

The international community as a whole has been reluctant to take action against Sudan for the international crimes being committed in Darfur. However, individual nations, including the United States, have expressed a strong interest in taking proactive measures to achieve justice for those atrocities. Victims of the Sudanese conflict may achieve justice through the domestic courts of the United States. Civilly, the Alien Tort Statute provides a cause of action to foreign citizens for torts committed against them in violation of international law, while the exceptions to the Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act permit personal jurisdiction over individuals acting on behalf …

Boyakasha, Fist To Fist: Respect And The Philosophical Link With Reciprocity In International Law And Human Rights, Donald J. Kochan

Donald J. Kochan

The Torture Victim's Protection Act, The Alien Tort Claims Act, And Foucault's Archaeology Of Knowledge, Eric A. Engle

Eric A. Engle

Outilnes the procedural obstacles to Alien Tort Statute Claims and discusses how to surmount them. Relates ATS to Foucaults power-knowledge and power-body discourses.