Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Courts (56)
- Constitutional Law (34)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (21)
- Judges (19)
- Law and Society (18)
-
- Criminal Law (16)
- Criminal Procedure (16)
- Litigation (14)
- Jurisprudence (13)
- Civil Law (10)
- Internet Law (10)
- Fourteenth Amendment (9)
- Human Rights Law (9)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (9)
- Legal Profession (8)
- First Amendment (7)
- Law and Psychology (7)
- Legislation (7)
- Civil Procedure (6)
- Evidence (6)
- Law and Politics (6)
- Legal History (6)
- State and Local Government Law (6)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (5)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (5)
- International Law (5)
- Juvenile Law (5)
- Science and Technology Law (5)
- Health Law and Policy (4)
- Institution
- Publication
-
- Adam Lamparello (21)
- Jay Tidmarsh (3)
- Tim Iglesias (3)
- Brannon P. Denning (2)
- Elizabeth T Lear (2)
-
- Jennifer Jackson (2)
- Joan E. Steinman (2)
- Manoj S. Mate (2)
- Mark C. Weber (2)
- Nancy S. Marder (2)
- Andre L. Smith (1)
- Benjamin Miller (1)
- Casey J Cooper (1)
- Cathren Page (1)
- Charles W. Murdock (1)
- David D. Butler (1)
- Eric A DeGroff (1)
- Fatma E Marouf (1)
- Hillary A Henderson (1)
- Hon. Mark C. Dillon (1)
- Jed Odermatt (1)
- Jesse Weinstein (1)
- Jonathan Yu (1)
- Joshua J Schroeder (1)
- Keith Swisher (1)
- Kevin M. Clermont (1)
- Linda L. Berger (1)
- Matthew J. Peterson (1)
- Meg Penrose (1)
- Michael L Perlin (1)
- File Type
Articles 61 - 74 of 74
Full-Text Articles in Law
In Defense Of Idea Due Process, Mark C. Weber
In Defense Of Idea Due Process, Mark C. Weber
Mark C. Weber
Due Process hearing rights under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act are under attack. A major professional group and several academic commentators charge that the hearings system advantages middle class parents, that it is expensive, that it is futile, and that it is unmanageable. Some critics would abandon individual rights to a hearing and review in favor of bureaucratic enforcement or administrative mechanisms that do not include the right to an individual hearing before a neutral decision maker. This Article defends the right to a due process hearing. It contends that some criticisms of hearing rights are simply erroneous, and …
Idea Class Actions After Wal-Mart V. Dukes, Mark C. Weber
Idea Class Actions After Wal-Mart V. Dukes, Mark C. Weber
Mark C. Weber
Wal-Mart v. Dukes overturned the certification of a class of a million and a half female employees alleging sex discrimination in Wal-Mart’s salary and promotion decisions. The Supreme Court ruled that the case did not satisfy the requirement that a class have a common question of law or fact, and said that the remedy sought was not the type of relief available under the portion of the class action rule permitting mandatory class actions. Over the last two years, courts have struggled with how to apply the ruling, especially how to apply it beyond its immediate context of employment discrimination …
Jurors And Social Media: Is A Fair Trial Still Possible?, Nancy Marder
Jurors And Social Media: Is A Fair Trial Still Possible?, Nancy Marder
Nancy S. Marder
No abstract provided.
Retroactivity And Prospectivity Of Judgments In American Law, Richard Kay
Retroactivity And Prospectivity Of Judgments In American Law, Richard Kay
Richard Kay
In every American jurisdiction, new rules of law announced by a court are presumed to have retrospective effect—that is, they are presumed to apply to events occurring before the date of judgment. There are, however, exceptions in certain cases where a court believes that such application of the new rule will upset serious and reasonable reliance on the prior state of the law. This essay, a substantially abridged version of the United States Report on the subject, submitted at the Nineteenth International Congress of Comparative Law, summarizes these exceptional cases. It shows that the proper occasions for issuing exclusively or …
California Egg Toss - The High Costs Of Avoiding Unenforceable Surrogacy Contracts, Jennifer Jackson
California Egg Toss - The High Costs Of Avoiding Unenforceable Surrogacy Contracts, Jennifer Jackson
Jennifer Jackson
In an emotionally charged decision regarding surrogacy contracts, it is important to recognize the ramifications, costs, and policy. There are advantages to both “gestational carrier surrogacy” contracts and “traditional surrogacy” contracts. However, this paper focuses on the differences between these contracts using case law. Specifically, this paper will focus on the implications of California case law regarding surrogacy contracts. Cases such as Johnson v. Calvert and In Re Marriage of Moschetta provide a clear distinction between these contracts. This distinction will show that while gestational carrier surrogacy contracts are more expensive, public policy and court opinions will provide certainty and …
The Puzzling Appeal Of Summary Judgment Denials: When Are Such Denials Reviewable?, Joan Steinman
The Puzzling Appeal Of Summary Judgment Denials: When Are Such Denials Reviewable?, Joan Steinman
Joan E. Steinman
No abstract provided.
Jurors And Juries, Nancy Marder
Amicus Brief On Behalf Of The Leo T. Mccarthy Center For Public Service And The Common Good And 44 Housing Scholars To California Supreme Court In California Building Industry Association V. City Of San Jose (S212072), Tim Iglesias, David Rusk, Jan Breidenbach, Nico Calavita, Steven Menendian, John A. Powell, Ofurhe Arnica Igbinedion, Samir Gambhir, Eli Moore
Amicus Brief On Behalf Of The Leo T. Mccarthy Center For Public Service And The Common Good And 44 Housing Scholars To California Supreme Court In California Building Industry Association V. City Of San Jose (S212072), Tim Iglesias, David Rusk, Jan Breidenbach, Nico Calavita, Steven Menendian, John A. Powell, Ofurhe Arnica Igbinedion, Samir Gambhir, Eli Moore
john a. powell
The briefs of other parties in the litigation emphasized inclusionary zoning’s goal of increasing the supply of affordable housing. This brief focuses on inclusionary zoning’s goal of promoting social inclusion and integration by locating affordable housing in the right location. The brief explains how economic and racial segregation deny equality of opportunity to low and moderate income families because segregation limits their potential for economic and social mobility by restricting access to the primary means of mobility, e.g. employment and education. Drawing from a wide array of empirical and other studies the brief demonstrates how inclusionary zoning is an effective …
Removal And Remand - Beyond The Supplements, Joan E. Steinman
Removal And Remand - Beyond The Supplements, Joan E. Steinman
Joan E. Steinman
This is a compilation of case descriptions and citations to law review articles that complements the contents of the 2014 Pocket Parts to volumes 14B and C of the Wright & Miller treatise on Federal Practice and Procedure. It was put together by the author of those Pocket Parts. The cases described here either are not included at all in the 2014 volume 14B and C Pocket Parts or are cited there for different propositions than are reflected in this electronic publication. The cases that are included in this electronic compilation came to my attention between mid-October, 2012, and mid-October, …
Defining “Family” For Zoning: Contemporary Policy Challenges, Legal Limits And Options, Tim Iglesias
Defining “Family” For Zoning: Contemporary Policy Challenges, Legal Limits And Options, Tim Iglesias
Tim Iglesias
Single family zones are ubiquitous, diversely-defined and both popular and controversial. Much of the controversy stems from who is excluded from living in these zones by the definition of “family.” After reviewing single family zones, policy rationales for them, and the basic types of definitions of family, this article surveys contemporary policy challenges and legal limits to definitions of “family.” Recognizing localities’ diverse contexts, the article articulates how localities can reassess their definitions and identifies relevant considerations.
The Practice And Theory Of Lawyer Disqualification, Keith Swisher
The Practice And Theory Of Lawyer Disqualification, Keith Swisher
Keith Swisher
Lawyer disqualification is commonly feared — as a “strategic,” “tactical,” and “harassing” “potent weapon” depriving clients of their trusted counsel of choice. Although disqualification comes with costs, fundamental misunderstandings fuel this common fear. This Article finds that disqualification is a uniquely effective remedy for lawyer misconduct and makes the following contributions to the law and practice of lawyer disqualification: (1) an exhaustive study surveying disqualification cases and refuting the common misconception that disqualification motions are uncontrollably on the rise and uncontrollably bad; (2) an accessible analysis of lawyer disqualification doctrine that permits lawyers and judges to begin assessing common disqualification …
Homage To Filártiga, Perry S. Bechky
Homage To Filártiga, Perry S. Bechky
Perry S. Bechky
The Supreme Court’s new decision in Kiobel severely restricted human rights litigation under the Alien Tort Statute (ATS). In doing so, the Court gravely injured the canonical human rights case of Filártiga. This essay celebrates Filártiga, demonstrating that it survives Kiobel in four key respects: its approach to the sources of international law, its conclusion that international law prohibits torture, its dynamic vision of the way the human rights revolution transformed international law, and its hope that courts can help make real a world without torture. The essay presents Filártiga as a living presence and a beacon for future development …
Party Subordinance In Federal Litigation, Scott Dodson
Party Subordinance In Federal Litigation, Scott Dodson
Scott Dodson
American civil litigation in federal courts operates under a presumption of party dominance. Parties choose the lawsuit structure, factual predicates, and legal arguments, and the court accepts these choices. Further, parties enter ubiquitous ex ante agreements that purport to alter the law governing their dispute, along with a chorus of calls for even more party-driven customization of litigation. The assumption behind this model of party dominance is that parties substantially control both the law that will govern their dispute and the judges that oversee it. This Article challenges that assumption by offering a reoriented model of party subordinance. Under my …
High Courts And Election Law Reform In The United States And India, Manoj Mate