Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Judges (88)
- Courts (76)
- Constitutional Law (32)
- Law and Society (30)
- Jurisprudence (23)
-
- Law and Politics (20)
- Legal History (18)
- Legal Profession (18)
- State and Local Government Law (18)
- Supreme Court of the United States (18)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (11)
- Legislation (10)
- Rule of Law (10)
- Administrative Law (9)
- President/Executive Department (9)
- Law and Gender (8)
- Law and Race (8)
- Litigation (8)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (7)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (7)
- International Law (7)
- Legal Writing and Research (6)
- Military, War, and Peace (6)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (5)
- Arts and Humanities (4)
- Human Rights Law (4)
- Jurisdiction (4)
- Legal Remedies (4)
- National Security Law (4)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (41)
- Pepperdine University (18)
- Duke Law (12)
- Fordham Law School (10)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (8)
-
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (7)
- The University of Akron (7)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (7)
- University of Richmond (7)
- University of South Carolina (7)
- Cornell University Law School (6)
- Valparaiso University (6)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (5)
- St. Mary's University (5)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (5)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (5)
- New York Law School (4)
- Seattle University School of Law (4)
- Cleveland State University (3)
- Northern Illinois University (3)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (3)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (3)
- Association of Arab Universities (2)
- Georgia State University College of Law (2)
- Pace University (2)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (2)
- United Arab Emirates University (2)
- University of Maine School of Law (2)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (2)
- University of Massachusetts School of Law (2)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Michigan Law Review (15)
- Law and Contemporary Problems (12)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (12)
- Pepperdine Law Review (10)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (8)
-
- Touro Law Review (7)
- University of Richmond Law Review (7)
- Akron Law Review (6)
- Cornell International Law Journal (6)
- Fordham Law Review (6)
- Indiana Law Journal (6)
- South Carolina Law Review (6)
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (6)
- Valparaiso University Law Review (6)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (5)
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (5)
- NYLS Law Review (4)
- Seattle University Law Review (4)
- St. Mary's Journal on Legal Malpractice & Ethics (4)
- Washington and Lee Law Review Online (4)
- Dalhousie Law Journal (3)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (3)
- Northern Illinois University Law Review (3)
- Northwestern University Law Review (3)
- Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal (3)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (3)
- Cleveland State Law Review (2)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (2)
- Georgia State University Law Review (2)
- Maine Law Review (2)
Articles 1 - 30 of 214
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Play’S The Thing: A Response To Judge Benjamin Beaton, Aaron J. Walayat
The Play’S The Thing: A Response To Judge Benjamin Beaton, Aaron J. Walayat
Pepperdine Law Review
In a recent speech, later published as an essay, the Hon. Benjamin Beaton of the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky shared his critical suggestions against the use of the honorific “Your Honor,” preferring instead the more neutral title “judge.” Judge Beaton’s reason for this preference stems from a fear that the current practice of judicial titles emphasizes status over function, which may inflate the individual judge’s ego while miscommunicating to the public that judges make, rather than find, law. This position, however, is misguided. Judicial titles emphasize the authority of the law through the authority …
The Absence Of A Parallel Path Of Appeal As A Condition For Accepting The Annulment Claim In Light Of The Judicial Diligence In The Jordanian Administrative Judiciary, احمد حسن ابو صباح, ميس خلدون صالح
The Absence Of A Parallel Path Of Appeal As A Condition For Accepting The Annulment Claim In Light Of The Judicial Diligence In The Jordanian Administrative Judiciary, احمد حسن ابو صباح, ميس خلدون صالح
Jerash for Research and Studies Journal مجلة جرش للبحوث والدراسات
The absence of a parallel appeal process is one of the formal conditions for accepting the annulment lawsuit, as this condition is considered a judicial one of origin. The legislation differed in adopting this condition, hence the problem of this research, as the Jordanian legislator did not stipulate the absence of a parallel appeal path as a condition for accepting the annulment case in The Administrative Judiciary Law, and accordingly, what is the position of the Jordanian administrative judiciary on the theory of the lack of a parallel path of appeal, and the extent to which the approach of the …
Judging The Judiciary, Amanda B. Hurst
Judging The Judiciary, Amanda B. Hurst
Georgia State University Law Review
Judicial legitimacy not only depends on judges maintaining the high ethical standards imposed on them but also on the public believing judges will be held accountable when they break the rules. However, judges are often viewed as “getting away with it.” This Article focuses on how to improve this problematic perception of state judicial discipline systems (JDSs). Part of the answer is more exposure, including a social media presence, for judicial discipline commissions (JDCs), the bodies in each state responsible for resolving misconduct complaints and recommending or imposing sanctions, because the public and media have a similar flawed understanding of …
Lessons From A Small And Troubled Country: Bosnia’S Struggling Judiciary Paints An Ominous Picture For The Future Of The Rule Of Law In The United States, David Pimentel
Mitchell Hamline Law Journal of Public Policy and Practice
No abstract provided.
All Cases Matter: Mitigating Bias In The Administrative Law Judiciary, Cherron Payne
All Cases Matter: Mitigating Bias In The Administrative Law Judiciary, Cherron Payne
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
After an introduction and explanation of bias in Part I, Part II of this article explores the issue of bias and the underlying factors that configure bias, such as attitude, stereotype, and prejudice. Part II also examines the two principal types of bias, explicit bias and implicit bias, and defines common subsets of bias, such as gender bias. Part III presents implicit bias as an unconscious, utilitarian, and neuroscientific mechanism. Part III examines the neuroscience of decision-making and the neural structures that influence and regulate decision-making processes. Part III also discusses emotion as an underpinning to decision-making and the role …
The Divine Right Of Judges: How Christian Thought Shaped The American Judiciary, Elise Mclaren Villers
The Divine Right Of Judges: How Christian Thought Shaped The American Judiciary, Elise Mclaren Villers
St. Mary's Law Journal
This Essay continues a discussion on the authority of courts, executives, and legislators to govern nations where the law diverges from necessity or morality. In a previous Comment, P. Elise McLaren, Answering the Call: A History of the Emergency Power Doctrine in Texas and United States, 53 St. Mary’s L.J. 287 (2022), I asked whether necessity or emergency ever supersedes the law, i.e., whether “emergency powers” exist. In this Essay, I ask whether the government is held accountable to a force other than the people themselves, namely, religious influence. As was done with respect to emergency powers, I ask …
Just-Right Government: Interstate Compacts And Multistate Governance In An Era Of Political Polarization, Policy Paralysis, And Bad-Faith Partisanship, Jon Michaels, Emme M. Tyler
Just-Right Government: Interstate Compacts And Multistate Governance In An Era Of Political Polarization, Policy Paralysis, And Bad-Faith Partisanship, Jon Michaels, Emme M. Tyler
Indiana Law Journal
Those committed to addressing the political, economic, and moral crises of the day— voting rights, racial justice, reproductive autonomy, gaping inequality, LGBTQ rights, and public health and safety—don’t know where to turn. Federal legislative and regulatory pathways are choked off by senators quick to filibuster and by judges eager to strike down agency rules and orders. State pathways, in turn, are compromised by limited capacity, collective action problems, externalities, scant economies of scale, and—in many jurisdictions—a toxic political culture hostile to even the most anodyne government interventions. Recognizing the limited options available on a binary (that is, federal or state) …
Promoting Women’S Advancement In The Judiciary In The Midst Of Backlash: A Comparative Analysis Of Representation And Jurisprudence In Key Domestic And International Fora, Shruti Rana
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
Women’s advancement in the judiciary of the United States has been slow and uneven, and has long lagged behind other nations. Parity in representation remains distant, and the gains to date vulnerable to changes in administrations and fluctuating levels of state commitment to gender equality, with the recent global backlash to gender equality and international norms and institutions providing a critical example of this fragility. In this light, this Article argues that gender parity in the judiciary should not be viewed as merely a laudable goal. Rather, representation and parity should be viewed as fundamental state legal obligations under international …
Hearing The Voice Of The Woman Judge: Diversity, Equality, And Participation, Rachel Cahill-O'Callaghan, Pauline Roberts
Hearing The Voice Of The Woman Judge: Diversity, Equality, And Participation, Rachel Cahill-O'Callaghan, Pauline Roberts
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
The UK has not achieved the judicial diversity of other common law jurisdictions. Whilst there is some success in the lower courts, few women judges have ever sat on the UK Supreme Court bench. It has long been argued that diversity enhances decision making, and the presence of women judges enhances the decision-making process. But this can only occur if women are appointed to the bench and supported to participate fully. Drawing on the theoretical framework developed by Sandra Fredman and the UK equality legislation, this Article explores how the structures and processes of the Supreme Court limit substantive equality …
The Right To Happiness Between Legal Basis And Judicial Practice: A Comparative Constitutional Study, Tarek Abo El Wafa Dr.
The Right To Happiness Between Legal Basis And Judicial Practice: A Comparative Constitutional Study, Tarek Abo El Wafa Dr.
مجلة جامعة الإمارات للبحوث القانونية UAEU LAW JOURNAL
The title of our research may surprise or astonish some people, as happiness, in fact, is something that is sought inside the man’s body, which makes it searched for and studied as a psychological and philosophical matter, not a legal one. However, this matter is aroused in the western legal jurisprudence a long time ago in terms of acknowledging it as one of the human rights. In reality, we can say that the supposed purpose of every law and every right embodies in achieving happiness for man. In other words, we can say that law and right are originally created …
The Fundamental Problem Of Regulating Technology, Hon. Justice Michael Kirby Ac Cmg
The Fundamental Problem Of Regulating Technology, Hon. Justice Michael Kirby Ac Cmg
Indian Journal of Law and Technology
Scientific breakthroughs and the ceaseless pace of technological innovation touch a diverse range of subject matter, with the most profound changes often proving to be the most controversial. Recent decades have seen the fields of biotechnology and information technology raise the most attention, with the deliberations of lawmakers and courts being increasingly focused on issues brought up by innovation within these fields. Though seemingly disparate and autonomous, given the wide range of issues brought up by the different facets of contemporary technological innovation, the author in this special comment presents how one can take an overview of the subject of …
How Biden Could Keep Filling The Federal Circuit Court Vacancies, Carl Tobias
How Biden Could Keep Filling The Federal Circuit Court Vacancies, Carl Tobias
Washington and Lee Law Review Online
In October 2020, Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden speculated that the fifty-four talented, extremely conservative, and exceptionally young, appellate court judges whom then-President Donald Trump and two relatively similar Grand Old Party (GOP) Senate majorities appointed had left the federal appeals courts “out of whack.” Problematic were the many deleterious ways in which Trump and both of the upper chamber majorities in the 115th and 116th Senate undermined the courts of appeals, which are the courts of last resort for practically all lawsuits, because the United States Supreme Court hears so few appeals. The nomination and confirmation processes which Trump …
Reconceiving Ethics For Judicial Law Clerks, Gregory Bischoping
Reconceiving Ethics For Judicial Law Clerks, Gregory Bischoping
St. Mary's Journal on Legal Malpractice & Ethics
Judicial law clerks hold a unique and critical position in our legal system. They play a central part in the functioning of the judiciary, oftentimes writing the first draft of their judge’s opinions and serving as their trusted researcher and sounding board. Moreover, they are privy to the many highly confidential processes and private information behind the important work of the judiciary. It stands to reason the comprehensive set of ethical duties that bind the world of lawyers and judges should also provide guidance for judicial law clerks. The most important among those ethics rules is a duty of confidentiality. …
Politicizing Impartiality: Redefining The Role Of The Senate In Federal Judicial Selection, Adam Harness, Melissa Harness
Politicizing Impartiality: Redefining The Role Of The Senate In Federal Judicial Selection, Adam Harness, Melissa Harness
Lincoln Memorial University Law Review Archive
The judicial selection process is heavily backlogged, resulting in excessive vacant judgeships, many in geographical areas with extremely high caseloads. Thus, the federal courts are falling further behind every year in settling disputes. The Senate’s action with President Obama’s nominee to the Supreme Court after the death of Justice Antonin Scalia has only escalated the dysfunction of the judicial selection process. Coupled with the fallout surrounding the death of Justice Ginsburg and Senator McConnell’s complete refusal to honor the precedent set by him in 2016, it has become glaringly apparent that the confirmation process conducted by the Senate needs to …
Two Diametrically Opposed Jurists: The Jurisprudence Of Chief Justices Roger B. Taney And Salmon P. Chase, Alexandra M. Michalak
Two Diametrically Opposed Jurists: The Jurisprudence Of Chief Justices Roger B. Taney And Salmon P. Chase, Alexandra M. Michalak
The Cardinal Edge
No abstract provided.
The Cost Of Access To Justice Revisited— The ‘Age Of Austerity’ In Brazilian Civil Procedure Five Years Later. Winds Of Change?, Antonio Gidi, Hermes Zaneti Jr.
The Cost Of Access To Justice Revisited— The ‘Age Of Austerity’ In Brazilian Civil Procedure Five Years Later. Winds Of Change?, Antonio Gidi, Hermes Zaneti Jr.
University of Miami Inter-American Law Review
No abstract provided.
“Remarkable Influence”: The Unexpected Importance Of Justice Scalia's Deceptively Unanimous And Contested Majority Opinions, Linda L. Berger, Eric C. Nystrom
“Remarkable Influence”: The Unexpected Importance Of Justice Scalia's Deceptively Unanimous And Contested Majority Opinions, Linda L. Berger, Eric C. Nystrom
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
The Robed Tweeter: Two Judges' Views On Public Engagement, Stephen Louis A. Dillard, Bridget Mary Mccormack
The Robed Tweeter: Two Judges' Views On Public Engagement, Stephen Louis A. Dillard, Bridget Mary Mccormack
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
The Arbitration System In Dealing With Urgent Requests, Musaed Alenzi
The Arbitration System In Dealing With Urgent Requests, Musaed Alenzi
UAEU Law Journal
Since the appearance of the arbitration system and its advantages, the state's monopoly of judiciary has retreated and the state ceded part of its general authority by allowing individuals and private entities to solve some of their disputes through ways they have consented to follow.
However, the state has still had urgent judiciary - beside the substantive judiciary – which guarantees quick and temporary solutions when imminent risk threatens their interests. As a result, the inquiry can be raised as whether the arbitrary judiciary has jurisdiction over disputes concerning imminent risks or not. After reviewing articles No. 173 – 188 …
Arbitration In Disputes Between Traders In The Jordanian National Capital Market, Murad Mahmoud Almawajdeh
Arbitration In Disputes Between Traders In The Jordanian National Capital Market, Murad Mahmoud Almawajdeh
UAEU Law Journal
The Jordanian legislator has adopted voluntary arbitration system as an alternative means for the state judiciary to resolve the disputes between the traders in the national capital market of Jordan. Parties often seek to resolve their disputes through arbitration because of a number of perceived potential advantages over judicial proceedings: arbitration is often faster than litigation in court, it can be cheaper and more flexible for businesses, and arbitral proceedings are generally non-public and can be made confidential.
So, we discussed in this research the legal provisions for arbitration in light of rules and regulations of the Amman Stock Exchange …
The Long Shortlist: Women Considered For The Supreme Court, Michael Conklin
The Long Shortlist: Women Considered For The Supreme Court, Michael Conklin
Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity
No abstract provided.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Wise Legal Giant, Thomas A. Schweitzer
Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Wise Legal Giant, Thomas A. Schweitzer
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Choice Of Law And The Preponderantly Multistate Rule: The Example Of Successor Corporation Products Liability, Diana Sclar
Choice Of Law And The Preponderantly Multistate Rule: The Example Of Successor Corporation Products Liability, Diana Sclar
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
Most state rules of substantive law, whether legislative or judicial, ordinarily adjust rights and obligations among local parties with respect to local events. Conventional choice of law methodologies for adjudicating disputes with multistate connections all start from an explicit or implicit assumption of a choice between such locally oriented substantive rules. This article reveals, for the first time, that some state rules of substantive law ordinarily adjust rights and obligations with respect to parties and events connected to more than one state and only occasionally apply to wholly local matters. For these rules I use the term “nominally domestic rules …
Acid Attacks In India: A Socio-Legal Report, Vidhik Kumar
Acid Attacks In India: A Socio-Legal Report, Vidhik Kumar
Dignity: A Journal of Analysis of Exploitation and Violence
India has the highest number of acid attacks globally every year, and despite the actions taken by the Indian Government and the Supreme Court of India, the crime is on the rise. This increase can be attributed to the patriarchal ideology that is prevalent in India and to India’s inadequate legal system, which does not deliver efficient remedies to the victims. This article will discuss the prevalence of acid attacks in India, motives behind the attacks, consequences on victims, and shortcomings in measures adopted to prevent the crime and provide justice to victims.
Avoiding Judicial Discipline, Veronica Root Martinez
Avoiding Judicial Discipline, Veronica Root Martinez
Northwestern University Law Review
Over the past several years, several high-profile complaints have been levied against Article III judges alleging improper conduct. Many of these complaints, however, were dismissed without investigation after the judge in question removed themselves from the jurisdiction of the circuit’s judicial council—oftentimes through retirement and once through elevation to the Supreme Court. When judges—the literal arbiters of justice within American society—are able to elude oversight of their own potential misconduct, it puts the legitimacy of the judiciary and the rule of law in jeopardy.
This Essay argues that it is imperative that mechanisms are adopted that will ensure investigations into …
Mirror, Mirror, On The Wall—Biased Impartiality, Appearances, And The Need For Recusal Reform, Zygmont A. Pines
Mirror, Mirror, On The Wall—Biased Impartiality, Appearances, And The Need For Recusal Reform, Zygmont A. Pines
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
The article focuses on a troubling aspect of contemporary judicial morality.
Impartiality—and the appearance of impartiality—are the foundation of judicial decision-making, judicial morality, and the public’s trust in the rule of law. Recusal, in which a jurist voluntarily removes himself or herself from participating in a case, is a process that attempts to preserve and promote the substance and the appearance of judicial impartiality. Nevertheless, the traditional common law recusal process, prevalent in many of our state court systems, manifestly subverts basic legal and ethical norms.
Today’s recusal practice—whether rooted in unintentional hypocrisy, wishful thinking, or a pathological cognitive dissonance— …
Justice Diseased Is Justice Denied: Coronavirus, Court Closures, And Criminal Trials, Ryan Shymansky
Justice Diseased Is Justice Denied: Coronavirus, Court Closures, And Criminal Trials, Ryan Shymansky
West Virginia Law Review Online
This Article aims to consider the immediate impacts of the novel coronavirus on criminal defendants’ access to speedy trials by jury. In particular, it aims to examine whether court closures and delays could affect the substantive rights of criminal defendants—and particularly pretrial detainees—to a speedy and public trial by jury. To date, very little scholarship has considered this question. Yet the ideal of a speedy trial by jury is deeply embedded in our Constitution and our judicial system, and the potential for a pandemic to limit or negate that right should ring scholastic and judicial alarm bells.
This analysis proceeds …
The Death Of The Autonomous Venezuelan Judiciary, Amid Bennaim
The Death Of The Autonomous Venezuelan Judiciary, Amid Bennaim
University of Miami Inter-American Law Review
Access to impartial and effective courts is the cornerstone of democratic civil society. When the intention of political actors is to extinguish democratic civil society, they often wear away at the autonomy of the judiciary. International law and the constitutions of many states throughout the world guarantee access to autonomous courts. Despite having such guarantees in place, the government of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela has consistently attacked the judiciary in order to erode its autonomy and bring it under political control. Strategies used to achieve that goal include purging judges, intimidating them, and preventing judges from getting tenure. As …
Applying The Privileges Or Immunities Clause To Gun Rights: A Framework To Depolarize The Debate And Strengthen The Federal Judiciary, Mohamed Akram Faizer
Applying The Privileges Or Immunities Clause To Gun Rights: A Framework To Depolarize The Debate And Strengthen The Federal Judiciary, Mohamed Akram Faizer
Saint Louis University Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Filling The Illinois Federal District Court Vacancies, Carl Tobias
Filling The Illinois Federal District Court Vacancies, Carl Tobias
Pepperdine Law Review
President Donald Trump repeatedly argues that appellate court appointments constitute his major success. The President and the United States Senate Republican Party majority have established records by approving fifty very conservative, young, and capable appellate court jurists. However, their confirmations have exacted a toll, particularly from the many federal district courts which address seventy-nine unfilled positions in 677 judicial posts. One constructive illustration has been the three Illinois tribunals which confront five pressing openings. The Administrative Office of the United States Courts classifies three as “emergencies,” because the vacant seats have been protracted and involve substantial caseloads. Despite this circumstance, …