Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (43)
- Criminal Procedure (11)
- Criminal Law (10)
- First Amendment (10)
- Courts (8)
-
- State and Local Government Law (8)
- Legal History (7)
- Business Organizations Law (6)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (6)
- Administrative Law (5)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (5)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (5)
- Fourteenth Amendment (5)
- Human Rights Law (5)
- Law and Politics (5)
- Commercial Law (4)
- International Law (4)
- Jurisprudence (4)
- Law and Philosophy (4)
- Law and Society (4)
- Legislation (4)
- Environmental Law (3)
- Fourth Amendment (3)
- Immigration Law (3)
- Law and Gender (3)
- President/Executive Department (3)
- Property Law and Real Estate (3)
- Sexuality and the Law (3)
- Social Welfare Law (3)
- Institution
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (20)
- Seattle University School of Law (6)
- University of Michigan Law School (6)
- University of Georgia School of Law (5)
- Pepperdine University (4)
-
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (4)
- University of Massachusetts School of Law (4)
- University of Tennessee, Knoxville (3)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (2)
- Valparaiso University (2)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- St. Mary's University (1)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (1)
- University of Missouri School of Law (1)
- University of New Hampshire (1)
- Publication
-
- Touro Law Review (20)
- Michigan Law Review (6)
- Seattle University Law Review (6)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (5)
- Catholic University Law Review (4)
-
- The Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship & the Law (4)
- University of Massachusetts Law Review (4)
- Tennessee Journal of Law and Policy (3)
- Nevada Law Journal (2)
- Valparaiso University Law Review (2)
- Cultural Encounters, Conflicts, and Resolutions (1)
- Maryland Law Review (1)
- Missouri Law Review (1)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (1)
- The University of New Hampshire Law Review (1)
Articles 31 - 60 of 61
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Framers' Fourth Amendment Exclusionary Rule: The Mounting Evidence, Roger Roots
The Framers' Fourth Amendment Exclusionary Rule: The Mounting Evidence, Roger Roots
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
State V. Brossart: Adapting The Fourth Amendment For A Future With Drones, Thomas Bryan
State V. Brossart: Adapting The Fourth Amendment For A Future With Drones, Thomas Bryan
Catholic University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Dred Scott: A Nightmare For The Originalists, Sol Wachtler
Dred Scott: A Nightmare For The Originalists, Sol Wachtler
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Nevada Public Policy And Higher Education: The Roles Of The Legislature And The Board Of Regents Under The Nevada Constitution, Thomas B. Mcaffee, Justin James Mcaffee
Nevada Public Policy And Higher Education: The Roles Of The Legislature And The Board Of Regents Under The Nevada Constitution, Thomas B. Mcaffee, Justin James Mcaffee
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Arrestee Number Two, Who Are You? Suspicionless Dna Testing Of Pre-Trial Arrestees And The Fourth Amendment Implications, Lesley A. Hall
Arrestee Number Two, Who Are You? Suspicionless Dna Testing Of Pre-Trial Arrestees And The Fourth Amendment Implications, Lesley A. Hall
Missouri Law Review
This Note discusses the resolution of that constitutional battle, Maryland v. King, where the U.S. Supreme Court held that DNA testing of pre-trial arrestees was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment as a routine booking procedure. The Court also held that DNA testing’s use for arrestee identification permitted its use as a tool to investigate suspicionless crimes. Part II analyzes the facts and holding of Maryland v. King. Part III discusses Fourth Amendment jurisprudence, including court-established tests used to ascertain whether a particular search is reasonable. Part IV examines the United States Supreme Court’s rationale in King, including Justice Scalia’s dissent, …
Appellate Division, Fourth Department, People V. Mcfarley, Erica R. Borgese
Appellate Division, Fourth Department, People V. Mcfarley, Erica R. Borgese
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminal Court, Kings County, People V. Artusa, Jessica Miller
Criminal Court, Kings County, People V. Artusa, Jessica Miller
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Supreme Court, Kings County, Wilson V. Kilkenny, James Dougherty
Supreme Court, Kings County, Wilson V. Kilkenny, James Dougherty
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Bruce Ledewitz, American Religious Democracy: Coming To Terms With The End Of Secular Politics, Thomas A. Schweitzer
Bruce Ledewitz, American Religious Democracy: Coming To Terms With The End Of Secular Politics, Thomas A. Schweitzer
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Court Of Appeals Of New York - People V. Gajadhar, Joseph Maehr
Court Of Appeals Of New York - People V. Gajadhar, Joseph Maehr
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Post-Conviction Access To A State's Forensic Dna Evidence For Probative Testing: Not A Freestanding Constitutional Right, Dorothea Thompson
Post-Conviction Access To A State's Forensic Dna Evidence For Probative Testing: Not A Freestanding Constitutional Right, Dorothea Thompson
Tennessee Journal of Law and Policy
In District Attorney's Office v. Osborne, the United States Supreme Court addressed the central issue of whether Respondent William Osborne should have a "freestanding and far-reaching constitutional right of access" to the State's deoxyribonucleic acid ("DNA") evidence for the purpose of post-conviction relief. Osborne asserted this constitutional right of access under the federal civil rights statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, rather than proceeding through a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The United States District Court for the District of Alaska initially dismissed the respondent's claims, holding that an application for habeas corpus constituted the proper mechanism …
Due Process And Equal Protection: A Constitutional Approach To Same-Sex Marriage, Ashley Musselman
Due Process And Equal Protection: A Constitutional Approach To Same-Sex Marriage, Ashley Musselman
Tennessee Journal of Law and Policy
On July 6, 2006, the Court of Appeals of New York decided Hernandez v. Robles. At issue in that case was whether New York's Domestic Relations Law violated the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the New York constitution by limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples. The plaintiffs were members of forty-four same-marriage licenses in the State of New York. The case began as four separate lawsuits in which the plaintiffs sought a declaratory judgment against "the license-issuing authorities of New York City, Albany, and Ithaca; the State Department of Health, which instructs local authorities about the issuance …
The Travel Act At Fifty: Reflections On The Robert F. Kennedy Justice Department And Modern Federal Criminal Law Enforcement At Middle Age, Adam H. Kurland
The Travel Act At Fifty: Reflections On The Robert F. Kennedy Justice Department And Modern Federal Criminal Law Enforcement At Middle Age, Adam H. Kurland
Catholic University Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Pragmatic Republic, If You Can Keep It, William R. Sherman
A Pragmatic Republic, If You Can Keep It, William R. Sherman
Michigan Law Review
These things we know to be true: Our modern administrative state is a leviathan unimaginable by the Founders. It stands on thin constitutional ice, on cracks between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. It burdens and entangles state and local governments in schemes that threaten federalism. And it presents an irresolvable dilemma regarding democratic accountability and political independence. We know these things to be true because these precepts animate some of the most significant cases and public law scholarship of our time. Underlying our examination of administrative agencies is an assumption that the problems they present would have been bizarre …
Institutional Autonomy And Constitutional Structure, Randy J. Kozel
Institutional Autonomy And Constitutional Structure, Randy J. Kozel
Michigan Law Review
This Review makes two claims. The first is that Paul Horwitz’s excellent book, First Amendment Institutions, depicts the institutionalist movement in robust and provocative form. The second is that it would be a mistake to assume from its immersion in First Amendment jurisprudence (not to mention its title) that the book’s implications are limited to the First Amendment. Professor Horwitz presents First Amendment institutionalism as a wide-ranging theory of constitutional structure whose focus is as much on constraining the authority of political government as it is on facilitating expression. These are the terms on which the book’s argument — and, …
Taking States (And Metaphysics) Seriously, Sanford Levinson
Taking States (And Metaphysics) Seriously, Sanford Levinson
Michigan Law Review
Sotirios A. Barber has written many incisive and important books, in addition to coediting an especially interesting casebook on constitutional law and interpretation. He is also a political theorist. An important part of his overall approach to constitutional theory is his philosophical commitment to “moral realism.” He believes in the metaphysical reality of moral and political truths, the most important of which, for any constitutional theorist, involve the meanings of justice and the common good. He not only believes in the ontological reality of such truths — that is, that these truths are more than mere human conventions or social …
Social Networking And Student Safety: Balancing Student First Amendment Rights And Disciplining Threatening Speech, John L. Hughes Iii
Social Networking And Student Safety: Balancing Student First Amendment Rights And Disciplining Threatening Speech, John L. Hughes Iii
University of Massachusetts Law Review
As the use of social media increases and becomes an integral part of nearly every student's life, problems arise when student expression on these sites turns into threats against the school or other students, implicating both student safety and the speaker's right to free speech. Facing a lack of Supreme Court precedent, school officials need guidance on whether and how to take action when a student makes threats on social network - how to prevent any danger at school while respecting the student's right to free speech. This note develops an approach that combines the Supreme Court's Watts "true threat" …
Taxing Judicial Restraint: How Washington's Supreme Court Misinterpreted Its Role And The Washington State Constitution, Nicholas Carlson
Taxing Judicial Restraint: How Washington's Supreme Court Misinterpreted Its Role And The Washington State Constitution, Nicholas Carlson
Seattle University Law Review
In the realm of constitutional interpretation, the judicial department reigns supreme. League of Education Voters v. State exemplifies the judiciary’s potential abuse of its interpretative role: The Washington Supreme Court misinterpreted its judicial function because it ignored the text of Washington State’s constitution and held a statute unconstitutional. The court, therefore, voided a statute because of judicial volition, not because Washington’s constitution demanded that outcome. This Note challenges the reasoning in League and makes a novel suggestion for Washington State constitutional analysis, an approach that may apply to other states. This Note details a new analytical framework for constitutional analysis …
Transgender Inpportunity And Inequality: Evaluating The Crossroads Between Immigration And Transgender Individuals, Alexandra Caggiano
Transgender Inpportunity And Inequality: Evaluating The Crossroads Between Immigration And Transgender Individuals, Alexandra Caggiano
Seattle University Law Review
Despite being married to a U.S. citizen, non-citizen transgender individuals and non-citizen spouses married to transgender U.S. citizens still face deportation today due to current immigration policies. When forced to return to their home countries, transgender individuals are likely to encounter violence from those who perpetuate hate towards transgender and gender non-conforming individuals. Instead of protecting these individuals, the United States continues to send people back to their native countries solely because those individuals do not fall within the narrowly constructed definition of marriage some states use that is legally recognized by federal courts. Transgender individuals receive disparate treatment as …
Constitutional Sex Discrimination, Lee Epstein, Andrew D. Martin, Lisa Baldez, Tasina Nitzschke Nihiser
Constitutional Sex Discrimination, Lee Epstein, Andrew D. Martin, Lisa Baldez, Tasina Nitzschke Nihiser
Tennessee Journal of Law and Policy
Nearly thirty years have elapsed since the U.S. Supreme Court decided Craig v. Boren, a landmark case in the Court's constitutional sex discrimination jurisprudence. In Craig, the justices pronounced that they would apply neither the lowest level of scrutiny-rational basis-nor the highest level-strict scrutiny-to evaluate claims of sex discrimination. Rather, the Court invoked a standard "in between" the two, now known as intermediate or heightened scrutiny. Under this approach, the Court asks whether a law challenged on equal protection grounds is substantially related to the achievement of an important objective.
Certainly the Craig Court's intermediate approach has its supporters; indeed, …
Plausible Absurdities And Practical Formalities: The Recess Appointments Clause In Theory And Practice, David Frisof
Plausible Absurdities And Practical Formalities: The Recess Appointments Clause In Theory And Practice, David Frisof
Michigan Law Review
The recent controversy surrounding President Obama’s recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau while the Senate was holding pro forma sessions illustrates the need to reach a new understanding of the Recess Appointments Clause of the Constitution. For the Recess Appointments Clause to be functional, it must fulfill two essential constitutional purposes: it must act as a fulcrum in the separation of powers, and it must ensure the continued exercise of the executive power. Achieving this functionality depends not only on the formal constructions of the Clause but also on the ways in …
Secret Arbitration Or Civil Litigation?: An Analysis Of The Delaware Arbitration Program, Jores Kharatian
Secret Arbitration Or Civil Litigation?: An Analysis Of The Delaware Arbitration Program, Jores Kharatian
The Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship & the Law
No abstract provided.
The Delaware Arbitration Experiment: Not Just A “Secret Court”, Jessica Tyndall
The Delaware Arbitration Experiment: Not Just A “Secret Court”, Jessica Tyndall
The Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship & the Law
No abstract provided.
Delaware's Closed Door Arbitration: What The Future Holds For Large Business Disputes And How It Will Affect M&A Deals, Myron T. Steele, Thomas J. Stipanowich, Robert Anderson, James R. Griffin, Katherine Blair, Monica Shilling
Delaware's Closed Door Arbitration: What The Future Holds For Large Business Disputes And How It Will Affect M&A Deals, Myron T. Steele, Thomas J. Stipanowich, Robert Anderson, James R. Griffin, Katherine Blair, Monica Shilling
The Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship & the Law
No abstract provided.
In Quest Of The Arbitration Trifecta, Or Closed Door Litigation?: The Delaware Arbitration Program , Thomas J. Stipanowich
In Quest Of The Arbitration Trifecta, Or Closed Door Litigation?: The Delaware Arbitration Program , Thomas J. Stipanowich
The Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship & the Law
The Delaware Arbitration Program established a procedure by which businesses can agree to have their disputes heard in an arbitration proceeding before a sitting judge of the state’s highly regarded Chancery Court. The Program arguably offers a veritable trifecta of procedural advantages for commercial parties, including expert adjudication, efficient case management and short cycle time and, above all, a proceeding cloaked in secrecy. It also may enhance the reputation of Delaware as the forum of choice for businesses. But the Program’s ambitious intermingling of public and private forums brings into play the longstanding tug-of-war between the traditional view of court …
Doe V. Wilmington Housing Authority: The Common Area Caveat As A Paradigmatic Balance Between Tenant Safety And Second Amendment Rights, Iyen Acosta
Catholic University Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Meaning And Purposes Of State Constitutional Single Subject Rules: A Survey Of States And The Indiana Example, Justin W. Evans, Mark C. Bannister
The Meaning And Purposes Of State Constitutional Single Subject Rules: A Survey Of States And The Indiana Example, Justin W. Evans, Mark C. Bannister
Valparaiso University Law Review
No abstract provided.
In Need Of Clarification: A Call To Define The Scope Of The Routine Booking Exception By Adopting The Legitimate Administrative Function Test, Elizabeth Parrish
In Need Of Clarification: A Call To Define The Scope Of The Routine Booking Exception By Adopting The Legitimate Administrative Function Test, Elizabeth Parrish
Catholic University Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Divergence Of Modern Jurisprudence From The Original Intent For Federalist And Tenth Amendment Limitations On The Treaty Power, Steven T. Voigt
The Divergence Of Modern Jurisprudence From The Original Intent For Federalist And Tenth Amendment Limitations On The Treaty Power, Steven T. Voigt
The University of New Hampshire Law Review
[Excerpt] “That the federal treaty-making authority is constrained by the other parts of the Constitution does not sound like the stuff of law journals. It seems like common sense. After all, we would not expect someone to argue that the ability to “regulate Commerce” entitles Congress to disregard the Third Amendment and quarter soldiers in our houses. We would not expect to see an argument that the power to “establish Post Offices” enables Congress to disregard the freedom of the press in the First Amendment. So, why is the Tenth Amendment so fully disregarded with respect to treaties?”
United States V. Alvarez: Defaming The Medal Of Honor Through Lies, Deceit, And The First Amendment, Christine Mcwilliams
United States V. Alvarez: Defaming The Medal Of Honor Through Lies, Deceit, And The First Amendment, Christine Mcwilliams
Valparaiso University Law Review
No abstract provided.