Law Commons^™

Race As Fiction: How Film And Literary Fictions Of 'Mulatto' Identity Have Both Fostered And Challenged Social And Legal Fictions Regarding Race In America, Bridget K. Smith

Seton Hall Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law

No abstract provided.

Editorial Board - Vol. 16, No. 1 2006

Seton Hall Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law

No abstract provided.

Table Of Contents

Seton Hall Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law

No abstract provided.

The Wisdom Of Major League Baseball: Why Free Agency Does Not Spell Doom For European Football, Oscar N. Pinkas

Seton Hall Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law

No abstract provided.

Should Nascar Be Allowed To Choose The Tracks At Which Its Series' Races Are Run?, Meri J. Van Blarcom-Gupko

Seton Hall Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law

No abstract provided.

Editorial Board - Vol. 16, No. 2 2006

Seton Hall Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law

No abstract provided.

How To Survive A Terrorist Attack: The Constitution's Majority Quorum Requirement And The Continuity Of Congress, John Bryan Williams

William & Mary Law Review

Since their realization that United Airlines Flight 93 was headed toward the U.S. Capitol on the morning of September 11, 2001, legislators and policymakers have been debating how the legislative branch would continue functioning in the aftermath of a terrorist attack that killed or incapacitated large numbers of sehators or representatives. This Article reviews the current House and Senate "Continuity of Congress"plans, and argues they are both practically and constitutionally inadequate. Focusing particularly on the Constitution's majority quorum requirement in Article I, Section Five, Clause One, this Article argues that a House or Senate operating in accordance with the current …

An Information Prescription For Drug Regulation, Anita Bernstein, Joseph Bernstein

Buffalo Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Thirteenth Juror: Media Coverage Of Supersized Trials, Mark J. Geragos

Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review

No abstract provided.

High-Profile Prosecutors &(And) High-Profile Conflicts, Laurie L. Levenson

Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review

No abstract provided.

Safer (Cyber)Sex With .Xxx: The Case For First Amendment Zoning Of The Internet, Patty Chan

Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review

No abstract provided.

A Low Threshold Of Guilt: Interpreting California's Fetal Murder Statute In People V. Taylor, Monica Mendes

Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review

No abstract provided.

A Whiff Of Things To Come: The Unreasonableness Of Dog Sniffs In Illinois V. Caballes, Jessica Na

Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review

No abstract provided.

Has Reality Programming Been Voted Off The Island Of Copyright Protection? Finding Protection As A Compilation, Jesse Stalnaker

Seton Hall Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law

No abstract provided.

Disturbing Yesterdays Media, Tomorrow: How Media Companies Mask Antiquated Operating Models With The Veil Of Copyright, Andrew M. Kulpa

Seton Hall Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law

No abstract provided.

Keeping The Public In The Public Use Requirement: Acquisition Of Land By Eminent Domain For New Sports Stadiums Should Require More Than Hypothetical Jobs And Tax Revenues To Meet The Public Use Requirement, Vanessa Bovo

Seton Hall Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law

No abstract provided.

The Long Road To Desuetude For Payola Laws: Recognizing The Inevitable Commodification Of Tastemaking, Krystal Conway

Seton Hall Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law

No abstract provided.

Reversing The Reversal Rate: Using Real Property Principles To Guide Federal Circuit Patent Jurisprudence, Paul M. Schoenhard

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Recent Trends Underscoring International Trade Commission Review Of Initial Determinations And Federal Circuit Appeals From Final Commission Determinations Under Section 337 Of The Tariff Act Of 1930, Robert A. Caplen

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The First Amendment Versus Operational Security: Where Should The Milblogging Balance Lie?, Katherine C. Den Bleyker

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Economics Of Cultural Misrepresentation: How Should The Indian Arts And Crafts Act Of 1990 Be Marketed?, Jennie D. Woltz

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Hoods Who Move The Goods: An Examination Of The Booming International Trade In Counterfeit Luxury Goods And An Assessment Of The American Efforts To Curtail Its Proliferation, Sam Cocks

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Scott V. Sandford: The Court's Most Dreadful Case And How It Changed History, Paul Finkelman

Chicago-Kent Law Review

Dred Scott, without doubt, is the most controversial case in the history of the United States Supreme Court. Unlike the controversies that surround other decisions of the Court, the controversy surrounding Dred Scott does not turn on if the outcome or Chief Justice Taney's analysis was wrong, but rather on why the outcome and Chief Justice Taney's analysis were wrong. This article focuses on the political goals Taney attempted to accomplish through his decision in Dred Scott. Though there existed reasons for Taney's belief that his decision in Dred Scott would once and for all end the political …

Thirteen Ways Of Looking At Dred Scott, Jack M. Balkin, Sanford Levinson

Chicago-Kent Law Review

Dred Scott v. Sandford is a classic case that is relevant to almost every important question of contemporary constitutional theory.

Dred Scott connected race to social status, to citizenship, and to being a part of the American people. One hundred fifty years later these connections still haunt us; and the twin questions of who is truly American and who America belongs to still roil our national debates.

Dred Scott is a case about threats to national security and whether the Constitution is a suicide pact. It concerns whether the Constitution follows the flag and whether constitutional rights obtain in federally …

Rethinking Dred Scott: New Context For An Old Case, Austin Allen

Chicago-Kent Law Review

Scholars have misunderstood the context in which Dred Scott emerged. Leading historical interpretations of the decision have relied too heavily on accounts developed by antebellum Republicans and on mid-twentieth-century legal theory. This article offers an alternative account of Dred Scott's origins and argues that the decision emerged from a series of unintended consequences resulting from the Taney Court's efforts to incorporate a Jacksonian vision of governance into constitutional law. By 1857, this effort had generated tensions that made a sweeping decision like Dred Scott nearly unavoidable. The inescapable nature of Dred Scott carries implications for constitutional theorists, especially those …

The New Fiction: Dred Scott And The Language Of Judicial Authority, Mark A. Graber

Chicago-Kent Law Review

Claims that the Justices in Dred Scott abandoned a tradition of judicial restraint rely on an anachronistic measure for judicial activism. Antebellum Justices asserted that laws were unconstitutional only when restraining state officials. Judicial etiquette, in their opinion, required more circumspection when imposing constitutional limits on a coordinate branch of the national government. Contrary to accepted wisdom, the Justices before the Civil War imposed constitutional limitations on federal power in approximately twenty cases. They did so, however, without explicitly declaring federal legislation unconstitutional. The Justices in some federal cases ignored the plain meaning of federal statutes on the ground that …

Emergence Of Equality As A Constitutional Value: The First Century, William M. Wiecek

Chicago-Kent Law Review

Equality as a constitutional value was unprecedented when it made its appearance in 1868 in the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. It reflected antebellum abolitionist ideals adopted hesitantly by Northern Republicans during Reconstruction, but these were incompatible with the expectations of most white Americans of the era, as well as with all previous American experiences. In this sense, equality was a revolutionary constitutional value. The framers of the Fourteenth Amendment intended the Equal Protection Clause and its embedded ideal of interracial equality to reverse the racist dicta of the Dred Scott opinion, to validate the Civil Rights Act …

The Last Angry Man: Benjamin Robbins Curtis And The Dred Scott Case, Earl M. Maltz

Chicago-Kent Law Review

The dissenting opinion of Justice Benjamin Robbins Curtis in Dred Scott has generally received lavish praise from commentators. Curtis is typically praised not only for his substantive conclusions, but also for his seemingly dispassionate analysis of the legal issues presented by the case. In many respects, this praise is well-deserved; Curtis's discussions of the issues of slavery in the territories and citizenship for free blacks are models of legal reasoning. However, a close analysis of other aspects of his opinion reveals that Curtis's analysis was at times distorted by his anger with the actions of Chief Justice Taney and other …

Benjamin Curtis: Top Of The List, R. Owen Williams

Chicago-Kent Law Review

Among the many brave and brilliant dissents from the Supreme Court, few are more historically significant than that of Benjamin Curtis in Dred Scott v. Sandford. Earl Maltz insists that the traditional view of Curtis as a dispassionate Justice is incorrect; Curtis is better seen as the "Last Angry Man." This paper considers the famous dissent, the man who wrote it, and the technical analysis Maltz claims as sine qua non to a proper understanding of the opinion.

Searching For A Needle In A Haystack: The Constitutionality Of Police Dna Dragnets, Sepideh Esmaili

Chicago-Kent Law Review

DNA dragnets—the mass warrantless DNA testing of individuals whom authorities have neither probable cause nor reasonable suspicion to believe perpetrated a crime, but who merely live or work near a crime scene—have increasingly been used by police departments in a desperate attempt to solve puzzling crimes. The lack of success and the Fourth Amendment constitutional concerns raised by DNA dragnets, however, lead this practice to be suspect. Under the Fourth Amendment, all searches of an individual must be reasonable. The reasonableness of any search typically depends on the government obtaining a warrant prior to the search. While there are well-established …