Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law and Society (19)
- Science and Technology Law (11)
- Constitutional Law (10)
- First Amendment (10)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (10)
-
- Internet Law (8)
- Law and Gender (8)
- Consumer Protection Law (5)
- Criminal Law (5)
- Fourth Amendment (4)
- Privacy Law (4)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (3)
- Courts (3)
- Criminal Procedure (3)
- Intellectual Property Law (3)
- Sexuality and the Law (3)
- Tax Law (3)
- Torts (3)
- Administrative Law (2)
- Banking and Finance Law (2)
- Business Organizations Law (2)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (2)
- Commercial Law (2)
- Evidence (2)
- Immigration Law (2)
- Labor and Employment Law (2)
- Law and Politics (2)
- Legal History (2)
- Legislation (2)
- Keyword
-
- Artificial intelligence; AI; finance (2)
- Legal ethics; professional responsibility; administrative law; government lawyers (2)
- AI; liability; technology; ethics (1)
- Administrative law; rulemaking; empirical analysis; legislative rulemaking; nonlegislative rulemaking (1)
- Amicus brief (1)
-
- Antitrust; market definition (1)
- Antitrust; no-poaching agreements; franchises (1)
- Antitrust; platforms; markets (1)
- Artifical intelligence; robots; personhood (1)
- Artificial intelligence; AI; law; neuroscience (1)
- Artificial intelligence; AI; medical; pharmaceutical (1)
- Attorney general; Department of Justice; legal ethics; professional responsibility; cronyism; political appointments (1)
- Automation; artificial intelligence; AI; decision-making; due process (1)
- Bankruptcy; contracts; due process (1)
- Border search; Fourth Amendment; electronic device; suspicionless searches (1)
- Citizenship; assisted reproductive technology; same-sex couples (1)
- Constitutional law; marriage equality; right to dignity; Supreme Court (1)
- Consumer pretection; technology; regulation; first amendment (1)
- Coordinating discovery attorneys; multidefendant; criminal; federal; legal ethics (1)
- Copyright Act; expert witness; litigation costs (1)
- Criminal law; drug crime; War on Drugs; sentencing (1)
- Criminal law; youth; Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (1)
- Cryptocurrency; bitcoin; tax law (1)
- Data-collection; Airbnb; privacy rights; Local Law 146 (1)
- Due process; Article III; international law; foreign nations; constitutional law (1)
- Election law; gerrymandering; ballot access; campaign finance; identity politics (1)
- Evidence; body camera; police camera; hearsay (1)
- Evidence; rule 702; forensic evidence; Daubert; rule 106; rule of completeness (1)
- FOSTA; sex-trafficking; sex workers; First Amendment (1)
- First Amendment; campus speech; diversity; inclusion; free speech (1)
Articles 61 - 72 of 72
Full-Text Articles in Law
Conference On Proposed Amendments: Experts, The Rules Of Completeness, And Sequestration Of Witnesses
Fordham Law Review
This conference was held on October 19, 2018, at University of Denver Sturm College of Law under the sponsorship of the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules. The transcript has been lightly edited. It represents the panelists’ individual views only and in no way reflects those of their affiliated firms, organizations, law schools, or the judiciary.
Policing The Admissibility Of Body Camera Evidence, Jeffrey Bellin, Shevarma Pemberton
Policing The Admissibility Of Body Camera Evidence, Jeffrey Bellin, Shevarma Pemberton
Fordham Law Review
Body cameras are sweeping the nation and becoming, along with the badge and gun, standard issue for police officers. These cameras are intended to ensure accountability for abusive police officers. But, if history is any guide, the videos they produce will more commonly be used to prosecute civilians than to document abuse. Further, knowing that the footage will be available as evidence, police officers have an incentive to narrate body camera videos with descriptive oral statements that support a later prosecution. Captured on an official record that exclusively documents the police officer’s perspective, these statements—for example, “he just threw something …
The Workers' Constitution, Luke Norris
The Workers' Constitution, Luke Norris
Fordham Law Review
This Article argues that the National Labor Relations Act of 1935, Social Security Act of 1935, and Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 should be understood as a “workers’ constitution.” The Article tells the history of how a connected wave of social movements responded to the insecurity that wage earners faced after the Industrial Revolution and Great Depression by working with government officials to bring about federal collective bargaining rights, wage and hour legislation, and social security legislation. It argues that the statutes are tied together as a set of “small c” constitutional commitments in both their histories and theory. …
Election Law And White Identity Politics, Joshua S. Sellers
Election Law And White Identity Politics, Joshua S. Sellers
Fordham Law Review
The role of race in American politics looms large in several election law doctrines. Regrettably, though, these doctrines’ analyses of race, racial identity, and the relationships between race and politics often lack sophistication, historical context, or foresight. The political status quo is treated as race-neutral, when in fact it is anything but. Specifically, the doctrines rely upon sanguine theories of democracy uncorrupted by white identity–based political calculations, while in fact such calculations, made on the part of both voters and political parties, are pervasive. In this Article, I appraise the doctrine pertaining to majority-minority voting districts, racial gerrymandering doctrine, the …
Back To The Future: Permitting Habeas Petitions Based On Intervening Retroactive Case Law To Alter Convictions And Sentences, Lauren Casale
Back To The Future: Permitting Habeas Petitions Based On Intervening Retroactive Case Law To Alter Convictions And Sentences, Lauren Casale
Fordham Law Review
In 1948, Congress enacted 28 U.S.C. § 2255, which authorizes a motion for federal prisoners to “vacate, set aside or correct” their sentences, with the goal of improving judicial efficiency in collateral review. Section 2255(e), known as the “savings clause,” allows federal inmates to challenge the validity of their imprisonments with writs of habeas corpus if § 2255 motions are “inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of [their] detention[s].” Due to the U.S. Supreme Court’s and Congress’s silence regarding what suffices as “inadequate or ineffective,” the circuit courts have adopted varied standards. The Sixth and Seventh Circuits hold that …
Saved By Labell: Local Taxation Of Video Streaming Services, Salvatore Cocchiaro
Saved By Labell: Local Taxation Of Video Streaming Services, Salvatore Cocchiaro
Fordham Law Review
Over the last few years, Netflix and other video streaming services have erupted to become a preeminent form of entertainment for millennials and the public at large. With traditional forms of entertainment waning, video streaming services represent a novel source of revenue for cities. Local governments currently have numerous tax approaches that may be used to cover these services. Different cities and states have taken distinctive approaches to taxing these services. Certain jurisdictions tax them in line with traditional pay-TV providers under utility taxes, while other jurisdictions tax them under sales or amusement taxes. This Note considers these different approaches, …
The "Uncontroversial" Controversy In Compelled Commercial Disclosures, Lauren Fowler
The "Uncontroversial" Controversy In Compelled Commercial Disclosures, Lauren Fowler
Fordham Law Review
Federal and state administrative agencies increasingly advance public health goals through the use of mandatory disclosures, like warning labels on cigarettes, that are intended to both inform and influence consumer decisions. However, the standard for determining whether these requirements violate a commercial speaker’s First Amendment rights is unsettled. In Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel, the U.S. Supreme Court adopted a test that defers to the government’s determination that the compelled disclosure of “factual and uncontroversial information” is justified. Since Zauderer was decided, lower courts have disagreed about the meaning of “uncontroversial.” A recent Supreme Court case, National Institute …
Full Cost In Translation: Awarding Expert Witness Fees In Copyright Litigation, Nicholas Vennekotter
Full Cost In Translation: Awarding Expert Witness Fees In Copyright Litigation, Nicholas Vennekotter
Fordham Law Review
When deciding whether to bring or defend against copyright infringement claims, the cost of litigation plays a critical role in the minds of potential litigants. The cost of retaining experts, particularly, is a large factor in this calculus. Although U.S. courts generally require each party to cover the cost of their own legal fees during litigation, the Copyright Act of 1976 permits courts, in their discretion, to allow the prevailing party to recover “full costs.” Yet, the language “full costs” is considered ambiguous, which leads to inconsistent awards of costs among the appellate courts. The circuits disagree whether the Copyright …
The Courier Conundrum: The High Costs Of Prosecuting Low-Level Drug Couriers And What We Can Do About Them, Adam B. Weber
The Courier Conundrum: The High Costs Of Prosecuting Low-Level Drug Couriers And What We Can Do About Them, Adam B. Weber
Fordham Law Review
Since the United States declared its “War on Drugs,” federal enforcement of drug-trafficking crimes has led to increased incarceration and longer prison sentences. Many low-level drug couriers and drug mules have suffered disproportionately from these policies; they face mandatory punishments that vastly exceed their culpability. Drug couriers often lack substantial ties to drug-trafficking organizations, which generally recruit vulnerable individuals to act as couriers and mules. By using either threats of violence or promises of relatively small sums of money, these organizations convince recruits to overlook the substantial risks that drug couriers face. The current policies of pursuing harsh punishments for …
The Light We Shine Into The Grey: A Restorative #Metoo Solution And An Acknowledgement Of Those #Metoo Leaves In The Dark, Nora Stewart
The Light We Shine Into The Grey: A Restorative #Metoo Solution And An Acknowledgement Of Those #Metoo Leaves In The Dark, Nora Stewart
Fordham Law Review
In the past year and a half, American women have publicly discussed experiences of sexual assault, harassment, and—notably—grey-area misconduct in an unprecedented manner. The rhetoric of the #MeToo movement is rife with references to “shining a light” on a set of unexplored issues hitherto obscured in cultural darkness, to following women’s experiences into the grey. What is new about #MeToo, and what likely will be the through line that defines its historical importance, has been its sensitivity to nuance. The grey range of #MeToo misconduct is not a new problem. It is emphatically new, however, as a subject of public …
Foreword: Rise Of The Machines: Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, And The Reprogramming Of Law, Deborah W. Denno, Ryan Surujnath
Foreword: Rise Of The Machines: Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, And The Reprogramming Of Law, Deborah W. Denno, Ryan Surujnath
Fordham Law Review
This Foreword provides an overview of Rise of the Machines: Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, and the Reprogramming of Law, a symposium hosted by the Fordham Law Review and cosponsored by the Fordham Law School’s Neuroscience and Law Center.
Two Roads Diverged: Statutory Interpretation By The Circuit Courts And Supreme Court In The Same Cases, Lawrence Baum, James J. Brudney
Two Roads Diverged: Statutory Interpretation By The Circuit Courts And Supreme Court In The Same Cases, Lawrence Baum, James J. Brudney
Fordham Law Review
Scholars and judges have long disagreed on whether courts of appeals construing statutes ought to adapt their use of interpretive resources to Supreme Court approaches. If circuit courts and the Supreme Court approach statutory issues in similar ways, this can perhaps provide a measure of predictability for litigants and the public while conserving judicial resources; it may also enhance perceptions of fairness in the judicial system. Such normative arguments invite—even demand—a fuller understanding of the underlying descriptive reality: whether anything approaching uniformity or consistency actually exists. This Article aims to provide that understanding. It does so through an in- depth …