Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Civil Procedure (4)
- Legal Profession (4)
- Fourth Amendment (3)
- Labor and Employment Law (3)
- Torts (3)
-
- Commercial Law (2)
- Communications Law (2)
- Consumer Protection Law (2)
- Criminal Law (2)
- Intellectual Property Law (2)
- Securities Law (2)
- State and Local Government Law (2)
- Administrative Law (1)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (1)
- Common Law (1)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1)
- Contracts (1)
- Family Law (1)
- International Humanitarian Law (1)
- International Law (1)
- Law and Psychology (1)
- Legal Education (1)
- Legal Remedies (1)
- Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law (1)
- Transportation Law (1)
- Water Law (1)
Articles 31 - 40 of 40
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Criminal Justice System's Response To Battering: Understanding The Problem, Forging The Solutions, Kathleen Waits
The Criminal Justice System's Response To Battering: Understanding The Problem, Forging The Solutions, Kathleen Waits
Washington Law Review
This article will focus on the appropriate criminal justice response to battering. Part II describes the nature of the problem of wife beating. It first discusses the extent of abuse in America to demonstrate the seriousness of the problem and the urgent need for solutions. The remainder of Part II looks at the issue on a more individual basis. It examines the battered woman, the batterer, the battering relationship, and the effects of abuse on the couple's children. An understanding of the participants and their relationship, unencumbered by the many myths that surround battering, is essential to creating effective legal …
Confronting The Fictions Of The Eleventh Amendment: Pennhurst State School And Hospital V. Halderman, 104 S. Ct. 900 (1984), Camille Gearhart
Confronting The Fictions Of The Eleventh Amendment: Pennhurst State School And Hospital V. Halderman, 104 S. Ct. 900 (1984), Camille Gearhart
Washington Law Review
This Note encourages lower federal courts to abandon the fictions of Ex Parte Young completely. The Note begins by exploring the history of the fictions of eleventh amendment doctrine. The Note then examines the Pennhurst Court's step forward in scorning these fictions and acknowledging that suits against state officers implicate state sovereignty. The Note next discusses the dilemma created by the Court's ruling that the eleventh amendment constitutionally prohibits federal judicial infringement of state sovereignty while at the same time acknowledging that the doctrine of Ex Parte Young allows such judicial infringement. Finally, the Note proposes that federal courts rely …
Civil Rico And The Prior Criminal Conviction Requirement: Has The Second Circuit Drawn The Net Too Tightly?—Sedima, S.P.R.L. V. Imrex Co., 741 F.2d 482 (2d Cir. 1984), Cert. Granted, 53 U.S.L.W. 3506 (U.S. Jan. 14, 1985) (No. 84-648), Diana K. Carey
Washington Law Review
This Note analyzes the Second Circuit's decision in Sedima against the background of the explosion of civil RICO suits and judicial attempts to contain that explosion. It concludes that courts should reject the prior criminal conviction requirement. The requirement is unsupported by either the language or the legislative history of the act, and in practice the requirement would frustrate legislative purposes and deny recovery to those victims whom Congress intended the act should compensate. Moreover, the requirement nullifies the purpose of the private attorney general concept. Until Congress acts to redefine the statute, other limitations would create more desirable results …
Can Civil Rule 52(A) Peacefully Co-Exist With Independent Review In Actual Malice Cases? Bose Corp. V. Consumers Union, 104 S. Ct. 1949 (1984), Cathy Parker
Washington Law Review
This Note examines Bose to determine whether the Court intended to totally reject Rule 52(a) as completely inapplicable in determinations of actual malice. It concludes that independent review should not replace Rule 52(a) in actual malice cases but rather should serve a separate function to ensure that the reasoning of district courts complies with constitutional legal principles. The Note further suggests that Bose created a new rule of law protecting the media from suit where defendants have simply used "imprecise language" in reporting. In addition, because of the ambiguitites in the Court's opinion, the case can support not only the …
Terry Stop Or Arrest? The Washington Court Attempts A Distinction—State V. Williams, 102 Wn. 2d 733, 689 P.2d 1065 (1984), Beryl N. Simpson
Terry Stop Or Arrest? The Washington Court Attempts A Distinction—State V. Williams, 102 Wn. 2d 733, 689 P.2d 1065 (1984), Beryl N. Simpson
Washington Law Review
In State v. Williams the Washington Supreme Court attempted to set forth specific criteria for determining when a temporary detention exceeds the bounds of a Terry stop and becomes an arrest, with the concomitant probable cause requirement. The court relied on both the fourth amendment and article 1, section 7 of the state constitution as the bases for its standards. The holding, however, is fact-specific, and the court's discussion of the permissible scope and intensity of an investigatory stop does not adequately establish guidelines for the police to apply in a future situation. Further, because the court did not ground …
Recognizing The Liability Of Social Hosts Who Knowingly Allow Intoxicated Guests To Drive: Limits To Socially Acceptable Behavior, Robert W. Gomulkiewicz
Recognizing The Liability Of Social Hosts Who Knowingly Allow Intoxicated Guests To Drive: Limits To Socially Acceptable Behavior, Robert W. Gomulkiewicz
Washington Law Review
Gradually, courts have joined these efforts to alleviate the harm caused by the intoxicated driver. A few courts have recognized an action in tort against those who contribute to drunken driving by serving intoxicating liquor. These courts have acted, in part, to relieve victims of the costs of drunken driving and to distribute the costs among those responsible for its occurrence. Washington courts should recognize the liability of a negligent social purveyor of alcoholic beverages. Courts need not be constrained from recognizing a common law cause of action because of competing social interests or legislative inaction. Washington courts should rule …
Qualified Common Law Privilege For News Reporters In Criminal Cases—State V. Rinaldo, 102 Wn. 2d 749, 689 P.2d 392 (1984), Susan Ward
Washington Law Review
In State v. Rinaldo, the Washington Supreme Court extended the news reporter's qualified common law privilege to criminal cases. This extension will adequately protect most confidential information held by reporters. In some cases, however, defendants will be able to defeat the qualified privilege announced in Rinaldo. The Washington courts should then construe article 1, section 5 of the Washington State Constitution to require in camera inspection of the information sought. The trial judge should order disclosure only upon concluding that the defendant's interest in obtaining the information outweighs the news reporter's interest in confidentiality.
Historical Truth, Narrative Truth, And Expert Testimony, Marianne Wesson
Historical Truth, Narrative Truth, And Expert Testimony, Marianne Wesson
Washington Law Review
This article examines studies tending to cast doubt on the existence of any special faculty that enables psychoanalytically trained experts to discern the historical truth. It then illustrates, by examining the events at one trial, the distortions in the trial process that can arise when experts do purport to resolve issues of historical truth. Finally, it suggests some solutions to the problems described.
Equitable Interest In Enhanced Earning Capacity: The Treatment Of A Professional Degree At Dissolution—In Re Marriage Of Washburn, 101 Wn. 2d 168, 677 P.2d 152 (1984), Helen A. Boyer
Washington Law Review
The Washington Supreme Court addressed this problem in In re Marriage of Washburn. The court held that a supporting spouse should be compensated for contributing to the attainment of a student spouse's degree. The court stated that such a contribution is a factor that trial courts must consider in dividing property or in awarding maintenance. It also held that trial courts must consider the future earning prospects of each spouse in making an award. Nonetheless, the court affirmed an award that was limited to restitution of direct expenditures and opportunity costs. A vigorous dissent argued that a professional degree is …
Washington Adopts Market Share Liability For Des Producers—Martin V. Abbott Laboratories, 102 Wn. 2d 581, 689 P.2d 368 (1984), Mark Reeve
Washington Law Review
In Martin v. Abbott Laboratories, the Washington Supreme Court adopted a narrow exception in DES cases to tort law's traditional requirement of causation. The court fashioned a liability-apportionment scheme based upon each defendant's contribution to the plaintiff's risk of harm: its "market share." The decision correctly refused to require joinder of a "substantial share" of the producers in the relevant market, and limited recovery to the percentage of the market actually joined. The court also decided to impose corporate successor liability on one drug manufacturer, drawing a dissent on the issue from three justices.