Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Vanderbilt Law Review

1957

Sherman Act

Articles 1 - 2 of 2

Full-Text Articles in Law

Exclusive Arrangements And Refusal To Deal Problems, Reynolds C. Seitz Dec 1957

Exclusive Arrangements And Refusal To Deal Problems, Reynolds C. Seitz

Vanderbilt Law Review

Justification for including a discussion on exclusive dealing arrangements and on refusal to deal decisions in a symposium devoted to trade practices rests upon the practical consideration that there exists on the part of business management a considerable interest in the two commercial tools.

Business executives find appeal in the prospect of using a contract calling for exclusive dealing.' Those engaged in commerce have for a variety of purposes frequently employed as a lever the refusal to deal.

Possible antitrust implications in the use of the two devices has not always been understood by business. In recent years, however, the …


Senate Bill No. Ii And Antitrust Policy, Kenneth S. Carlston Dec 1957

Senate Bill No. Ii And Antitrust Policy, Kenneth S. Carlston

Vanderbilt Law Review

The history of the judicial interpretation of the Sherman Act' is a history of the legislative process working through the mechanisms of the judicial process. Starting with an act phrased in the most general of terms, nearly seventy years of judicial administration have developed a system of interdependent postulates analogous to legislative norms. None of these postulates can be considered as prevailing over all others. But the binding thread of the Sherman Act is the proposition that the market shall be dynamic, manifesting sufficient energy through price competition by the organizations participating in the market to ensure that the advances …