Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Family Law (17)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (14)
- Law and Race (12)
- Constitutional Law (10)
- Legal Education (8)
-
- Litigation (8)
- Civil Procedure (7)
- Criminal Law (6)
- Criminal Procedure (5)
- Immigration Law (4)
- Judges (4)
- Civil Law (3)
- First Amendment (3)
- Law and Society (3)
- Social Welfare Law (3)
- Administrative Law (2)
- Agency (2)
- Consumer Protection Law (2)
- Contracts (2)
- Courts (2)
- Education Law (2)
- International Law (2)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (2)
- Military, War, and Peace (2)
- Other Law (2)
- Religion Law (2)
- Science and Technology Law (2)
- Sexuality and the Law (2)
- Banking and Finance Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Family law; race (2)
- Administrative law; agencies; APA; policy; cities; states (1)
- Asbestos; civil litigation (1)
- Biotechnology; regulation; CRISPR (1)
- Chevron deference; administrative state; administrative rules; rule interpretation (1)
-
- Civil Litigation; Prens Patriae; Opioid (1)
- Civil rights law; constitutional law; law and race (1)
- Civil rights law; constitutional law; law and race; family law (1)
- Civil rights law; constitutional law; law and race; reproductive law; family law; health law (1)
- Civil rights; constitutional law; religion; sexual orientation; race (1)
- Civil rights; family law; race (1)
- Class actions; civil litigation; FICALA (1)
- Class actions; civil litigation; civil procedure (1)
- Class actions; class definition; civil litigation; civil procedure (1)
- Complex litigation; torts; Bristol-Myers; personal jurisdiction (1)
- Consitutional law; family law; civil rights (1)
- Constitutional Law; Equal Protection; School Vouchers; LGBT (1)
- Constitutional law; civil rights (1)
- Constitutional law; criminal procedure; fourth amendment; fifth amendment; encryption; smartphone (1)
- Constitutional law; family law; race; sexual orientation (1)
- Copyright law; infringement; fair use (1)
- Criminal Law; Public Health; Rape (1)
- Criminal Law; Travel Act; Statutory Interpretation (1)
- Criminal justice reform; bail reform; constitutional rights; constitutional law; risk assessment instrument (1)
- Criminal law; criminal ethics; prosecutorial discretion (1)
- Criminal law; law and ethics; racial justice; civil rights law; professional responsibility (1)
- Criminal procedure; electronically stored information; search warrants (1)
- Cybersecurity; data protection; regulation; GDPR (1)
- Employment discrimination; title vii; disparate treatment theory (1)
- Establishment Clause; Contracts; Investment Banking; Sharia Law; Sukuk (1)
Articles 61 - 66 of 66
Full-Text Articles in Law
Class Problem!: Why The Inconsistent Application Of Rule 23'S Class Certification Requirements During Overbreadth Analysis Is A Threat To Litigant Certainty, David I. Berman
Fordham Law Review
Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is home to the class action device. It is well-documented that this rule significantly impacts our legal system. As a result, the need for its effective utilization has been apparent since its introduction. Despite this, federal courts have inconsistently applied the rule during their analyses of overbroad class definitions at the class certification stage. Consequently, parties involved in such litigation have been exposed to unnecessary costs and the potential for forum shopping. Nonetheless, this judicial inconsistency has gone largely unrecognized because it does not implicate the results of class certification. Hence, …
Loving Lessons: White Supremacy, Loving V. Virginia, And Disproportionality In The Child Welfare System, Leah A. Hill
Loving Lessons: White Supremacy, Loving V. Virginia, And Disproportionality In The Child Welfare System, Leah A. Hill
Fordham Law Review
Part I of this Article introduces a brief discussion of the history of antimiscegenation laws and, specifically, their prevalence in the Commonwealth of Virginia during the 1950s. Next, Part II sets forth a short commentary about the Lovings’ triumph over antimiscegenation. Part III then details the Lovings’ judicial hurdles against the state, which argued that its antimiscegenation laws were enacted, in part, to prevent child abuse and thus served legitimate state interests. Part IV argues that the remnants of the white supremacist ideology at the center of Loving appear in our modern child welfare system, which has long been plagued …
Implicit Racial Biases In Prosecutorial Summations: Proposing An Integrated Response, Praatika Prasad
Implicit Racial Biases In Prosecutorial Summations: Proposing An Integrated Response, Praatika Prasad
Fordham Law Review
Racial bias has evolved from the explicit racism of the Jim Crow era to amore subtle and difficult-to-detect form: implicit racial bias. Implicit racial biases exist unconsciously and include negative racial stereotypes andassociations. Everyone, including actors in the criminal justice system who believe themselves to be fair, possess these biases. Although inaccessible through introspection, implicit biases can easily be triggered through language. When trials involve Black defendants, prosecutors’ summations increasingly include racial themes that could trigger jurors’ implicit biases, lead to the perpetuation of unfair stereotypes, and contribute to racial injustice and disparate outcomes. This Note examines and critiques the …
Foreword, Robin A. Lenhardt, Tanya K. Hernandez, Kimani Paul-Emile
Foreword, Robin A. Lenhardt, Tanya K. Hernandez, Kimani Paul-Emile
Fordham Law Review
This Foreword provides an overview of Fifty Years of Loving v. Virginia and the Continued Pursuit of Racial Equality, a symposium hosted by the Fordham Law Review and cosponsored by the Fordham Law School Center on Race, Law & Justice. Even fifty years later, Loving provides ample foundation for an inquiry into the operation of race and racial inequality in the United States, which touches on the queries outlined above, as well as many others. In our view, a symposium focused on Loving makes a significant contribution by deepening scholarly analysis of that decision and by explicating the kinds of …
When A Wrongful Birth Claim May Not Be Wrong: Race, Inequality, And The Cost Of Blackness, Kimani Paul-Emile
When A Wrongful Birth Claim May Not Be Wrong: Race, Inequality, And The Cost Of Blackness, Kimani Paul-Emile
Fordham Law Review
The year 2017 marked the fiftieth anniversary of the Loving v. Virginia decision, in which a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court struck down as unconstitutional laws prohibiting interracial marriage. Today, when we consider interracial loving, we tend to envision romantic relationships. What is often overlooked, however, is the relationship between parent and child: among the most intimate of relationships. A primary reason for this oversight may be that we do not often conceptualize the parent and child relationship as an interracial space. Indeed, although most people select their romantic partners, few are afforded the opportunity to select their children outside of …
The Intuitive Appeal Of Explainable Machines, Andrew D. Selbst, Solon Barocas
The Intuitive Appeal Of Explainable Machines, Andrew D. Selbst, Solon Barocas
Fordham Law Review
Algorithmic decision-making has become synonymous with inexplicable decision-making, but what makes algorithms so difficult to explain? This Article examines what sets machine learning apart from other ways of developing rules for decision-making and the problem these properties pose for explanation. We show that machine learning models can be both inscrutable and nonintuitive and that these are related, but distinct, properties. Calls for explanation have treated these problems as one and the same, but disentangling the two reveals that they demand very different responses. Dealing with inscrutability requires providing a sensible description of the rules; addressing nonintuitiveness requires providing a satisfying …