Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Rawls (33)
- Constitutional Theory (30)
- Politics (26)
- Citizenship (23)
- Democrazy (23)
-
- Theory (12)
- E-Discovery (9)
- Access (8)
- Justice (8)
- Equality (7)
- Gun Regulation (7)
- Property (7)
- Second Amendment (7)
- Constitutional Law (6)
- Gun Regulation (6)
- Civil Rights (5)
- Ethnicity (5)
- Race (5)
- Tort (5)
- Ethics (4)
- Labor (4)
- Tax (4)
- Taxation (4)
- First Amendment (3)
- Fraud (3)
- Liability (3)
- Professional Responsibility (3)
- Reform (3)
- Appellate (2)
- Children (2)
Articles 61 - 90 of 109
Full-Text Articles in Law
Gender, Justice And Gender: An Unfinished Debate, Susan Moller Okin
Gender, Justice And Gender: An Unfinished Debate, Susan Moller Okin
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
Gender, Why Feminists Can't (Or Shouldn't) Be Liberals, Tracy E. Higgins
Gender, Why Feminists Can't (Or Shouldn't) Be Liberals, Tracy E. Higgins
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
Race And Ethnicity, Race, Labor, And The Fair Equality Of Opportunity Principle, Seana Valentine Shiffrin
Race And Ethnicity, Race, Labor, And The Fair Equality Of Opportunity Principle, Seana Valentine Shiffrin
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
Race And Ethnicity, Race, Face, And Rawls, Anita L. Allen
Race And Ethnicity, Race, Face, And Rawls, Anita L. Allen
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
Race And Ethnicity, Race And Social Justice: Rawlsian Considerations, Tommie Shelby
Race And Ethnicity, Race And Social Justice: Rawlsian Considerations, Tommie Shelby
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
What Self-Governing Peoples Owe To One Another: Universalism, Diversity, And The Law Of Peoples, Stephen Macedo
What Self-Governing Peoples Owe To One Another: Universalism, Diversity, And The Law Of Peoples, Stephen Macedo
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Incoherence Between Rawls's Theories Of Justice, Thomas W. Pogge
The Incoherence Between Rawls's Theories Of Justice, Thomas W. Pogge
Fordham Law Review
Would it be desirable to reform the global institutional order in conformity with the principles Rawls defends in A Theory on Justice? Rawls himself denies this and proposes a different moral theory (The Law of Peoples) for the relations among self-governing peoples. While sharing a questionable, purely recipient-oriented approach, his two theories differ importantly in substance and structure. The former gives weight only to the interests of individual persons, yet the latter gives no weight to these interests at all. The former theory is three-tiered and institutional, centering on a public criterion of justice that is justified through a contractualist …
The Law Of Peoples, Distributive Justice, And Migrations, Seyla Benhabib
The Law Of Peoples, Distributive Justice, And Migrations, Seyla Benhabib
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rights, Reality, And Utopia, Martin S. Flaherty
Rights, Reality, And Utopia, Martin S. Flaherty
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
Tort, Ripstein, Rawls, And Responsibility, Stephen Perry
Tort, Ripstein, Rawls, And Responsibility, Stephen Perry
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
Tort, Rawls In Tort Theory: Themes And Counter-Themes, Benjamin C. Zipursky
Tort, Rawls In Tort Theory: Themes And Counter-Themes, Benjamin C. Zipursky
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
Tort, Rawlsian Fairness And Regime Choice In The Law Of Accidents, Gregory C. Keating
Tort, Rawlsian Fairness And Regime Choice In The Law Of Accidents, Gregory C. Keating
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
What Does A Fair Society Owe Children - And Their Parents?, Anne L. Alstott
What Does A Fair Society Owe Children - And Their Parents?, Anne L. Alstott
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
Theories Of Distributive Justice And Limitations On Taxation: What Rawls Demands From Tax Systems, Linda Sugin
Theories Of Distributive Justice And Limitations On Taxation: What Rawls Demands From Tax Systems, Linda Sugin
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
Comments: Individual Versus Collective Responsibility, Thomas Nagel
Comments: Individual Versus Collective Responsibility, Thomas Nagel
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
Public Reason And Precluded Reasons, Dennis F. Thompson
Public Reason And Precluded Reasons, Dennis F. Thompson
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
Public Reason And Political Justifications, Samuel Freeman
Public Reason And Political Justifications, Samuel Freeman
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
On Actualizing Public Reason, Michael Baur
On Actualizing Public Reason, Michael Baur
Fordham Law Review
In this Essay, I examine some apparent difficulties with what I call the "actualization criterion" connected to Rawls's notion of public reason, that is, the criterion for determining when Rawlsian public reason is concretely actualized by citizens in their deliberating and deciding about constitutional essentials and matters of basic justice. While these apparent difficulties have led some commentators to reject Rawlsian public reason altogether, I offer an interpretation that might allow Rawlsian public reason to escape the difficulties. My reading involves the claim that Rawlsian public reason is to be understood essentially as an imperative or an ideal, and as …
The Stars And Stripes In Al-Fardos Square: The Implications For The International Law Of Belligerent Occupation, Michael Ottolenghi
The Stars And Stripes In Al-Fardos Square: The Implications For The International Law Of Belligerent Occupation, Michael Ottolenghi
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
Limited But Not Lost: A Comment On The Ecj's Golden Share Decisions, Christine O'Grady Putek
Limited But Not Lost: A Comment On The Ecj's Golden Share Decisions, Christine O'Grady Putek
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Modest Reform: The New Rule 32.1 Permitting Citation To Unpublished Opinions In The Federal Courts Of Appeals, Anne Coyle
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
An Indictment Of Bright Line Tests For Honest Services Mail Fraud, Carrie A. Tendler
An Indictment Of Bright Line Tests For Honest Services Mail Fraud, Carrie A. Tendler
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rules 33 And 34: Defining E-Documents And The Form Of Production, David R. Buchanan, Adam I. Cohen, James C. Francis Iv, Paul M. Robertson
Rules 33 And 34: Defining E-Documents And The Form Of Production, David R. Buchanan, Adam I. Cohen, James C. Francis Iv, Paul M. Robertson
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rules 26, 33, And/Or 34: Burdens Of Production: Locating And Accessing Electronically Stored Data, John M. Facciola, Robert M. Hollis, Gregory S. Mccurdy, Joseph M. Sellers
Rules 26, 33, And/Or 34: Burdens Of Production: Locating And Accessing Electronically Stored Data, John M. Facciola, Robert M. Hollis, Gregory S. Mccurdy, Joseph M. Sellers
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rules 26 And/Or 34: Protection Against Inadvertent Privilege Waiver , Sheila L. Birnbaum, Daniel J. Capra, Jonathan M. Redgrave, Joseph R. Saveri
Rules 26 And/Or 34: Protection Against Inadvertent Privilege Waiver , Sheila L. Birnbaum, Daniel J. Capra, Jonathan M. Redgrave, Joseph R. Saveri
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
Civil Rules Advisory Committee Alumni Panel: The Process Of Amending The Civil Rules, John L. Carroll, Patrick E. Higginbotham, Thomas D. Rowe Jr., C. Roger Vinson
Civil Rules Advisory Committee Alumni Panel: The Process Of Amending The Civil Rules, John L. Carroll, Patrick E. Higginbotham, Thomas D. Rowe Jr., C. Roger Vinson
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
Euclid Lives? The Uneasy Legacy Of Progressivism In Zoning, Eric R. Claeys
Euclid Lives? The Uneasy Legacy Of Progressivism In Zoning, Eric R. Claeys
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Law Of Typicality: Examining The Procedural Due Process Implications Of Sandin V. Conner, Donna H. Lee
The Law Of Typicality: Examining The Procedural Due Process Implications Of Sandin V. Conner, Donna H. Lee
Fordham Law Review
Although the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment has long protected against deprivations that implicate state-created liberty interests as well as core constitutional concerns, the Supreme Court changed course in liberty interest jurisprudence in Sandin v. Conner. It retreated from a positivist approach and articulated a new test for determining when a prisoner's claim warrants procedural due process. The Court held that the challenged action must impose an "atypical and significant" hardship, but provided little guidance on how to measure typicality and significance. This Article proposes a methodology for examining typicality that is grounded in empirical evidence and advocates …
Nearly A Decade Later: Revisiting Gustafson And The Status Of Section 12(A)(2) Liability In The Courts - Creative Judicial Developments And A Proposal For Reform, Natasha S. Guinan
Nearly A Decade Later: Revisiting Gustafson And The Status Of Section 12(A)(2) Liability In The Courts - Creative Judicial Developments And A Proposal For Reform, Natasha S. Guinan
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
Jurisdictional Line-Drawing In A Time When So Much Litigation Is "Related To" Bankruptcy: A Practical And Constitutional Solution, Duane Loft
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.