Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (263)
- Criminal Law (170)
- State and Local Government Law (97)
- Intellectual Property Law (96)
- International Law (90)
-
- Torts (86)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (83)
- Supreme Court of the United States (81)
- First Amendment (80)
- Jurisprudence (79)
- Civil Procedure (72)
- Labor and Employment Law (61)
- Family Law (54)
- Business Organizations Law (52)
- Criminal Procedure (52)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (50)
- Tax Law (49)
- Fourteenth Amendment (48)
- Evidence (47)
- Litigation (44)
- Health Law and Policy (43)
- Environmental Law (41)
- Legal Education (40)
- Banking and Finance Law (39)
- Property Law and Real Estate (39)
- Education Law (38)
- Juvenile Law (38)
- Law and Gender (35)
- Medical Jurisprudence (35)
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional law (62)
- Intellectual property (52)
- Due process (46)
- First Amendment (46)
- Criminal law (34)
-
- Fourteenth amendment (28)
- Constitution (27)
- Title VII (25)
- Discrimination (24)
- First amendment (23)
- Equal protection (21)
- Evidence (21)
- Fourteenth Amendment (21)
- Civil rights (19)
- International law (19)
- Divorce (18)
- Ethics (18)
- Fourth Amendment (18)
- Copyright (17)
- Human rights (17)
- Supreme Court (17)
- Federal income tax (15)
- Patent (15)
- Trademark (15)
- Civil procedure (14)
- Torts (14)
- Antitrust (13)
- Discovery (13)
- ERISA (13)
- Medical malpractice (13)
- Publication Year
- File Type
Articles 1501 - 1530 of 1553
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Duke Rape Case Five Years Later: Lessons For The Academy, The Media, And The Criminal Justice System, Dan Subotnik
The Duke Rape Case Five Years Later: Lessons For The Academy, The Media, And The Criminal Justice System, Dan Subotnik
Akron Law Review
The time that has since passed allows for a more comprehensive evaluation of the cultural meaning of the Duke Rape case. This is the goal of the newly released “Institutional Failures,” which constitutes a point of departure for this review. The aim of this article is first to clarify the contribution this book makes to an understanding of the case. I will describe and analyze the content of the nine essays that make up the book; I will make reference to related works, and I will offer a concluding evaluation of the book’s likely impact.
Sex Slavery In The Lone Star State: Does The Texas Human Trafficking Legislation Of 2011 Protect Minors?, Cheryl Nelson Butler
Sex Slavery In The Lone Star State: Does The Texas Human Trafficking Legislation Of 2011 Protect Minors?, Cheryl Nelson Butler
Akron Law Review
This Article argues that, while Texas has made great strides in its movement to combat child trafficking, there are three major areas in which further reform is needed. First, Texas should provide stronger protections for not only minors trafficked for sex, but also those trafficked for labor. Second, Texas law must shift its emphasis from prosecution of traffickers to a more balanced approach that also prioritizes the protection of minors and the prevention of future trafficking crimes against them. Third, Texas should adopt safe harbor provisions that reflect a child welfare response toward prostituted minors
The Changing Face Of Legal Education: Its Impact On What It Means To Be A Lawyer, Thomas D. Morgan
The Changing Face Of Legal Education: Its Impact On What It Means To Be A Lawyer, Thomas D. Morgan
Akron Law Review
I have written a book called The Vanishing American Lawyer. My premise is not that too few people have a legal education. I say, instead, that what people now do with legal training is changing rapidly and likely will continue to become more diverse. That leaves me suggesting that there is little left to the general concept of being a lawyer. Yet people still talk about lawyers, and the question of what it means to be a lawyer is especially timely in light of current American Bar Association efforts to revise the standards by which American law schools are accredited. …
A Tribute To The Honorable Sam H. Bell ('52), Richard L. Aynes, Margaret Andreeff Matejkovic
A Tribute To The Honorable Sam H. Bell ('52), Richard L. Aynes, Margaret Andreeff Matejkovic
Akron Law Review
The late Judge Sam H. Bell (’52) saw the powerful effect of, and beauty in, words. He wrote and spoke them with precision, with thoughtfulness, and with compassion. And he listened intently to the words of others—to the words of all people from all walks of life. His fundamental humanity, great kindness, and assiduous pursuit of knowledge through perusing of the philosophies, the histories, and the literature of the law permeated his choice of words in his speeches and writings. It is because of these and other qualities of Judge Bell’s character as a man and as a judge that …
Splitting The Baby: Immigration, Family Law, And The Problem Of The Single Deportable Parent, Timothy E. Yahner
Splitting The Baby: Immigration, Family Law, And The Problem Of The Single Deportable Parent, Timothy E. Yahner
Akron Law Review
The purpose of this article is not to suggest that the Fifth Circuit was wrong in upholding the dismissal of Monica’s case. Indeed, the court was faced with a dilemma that would give King Solomon pause: what to do when two parents claim one child. This article’s purpose is to show that a regulatory solution is preferable to forcing the courts to make impossible choices between parents. Part II discusses the factual and procedural history of Castro. Part III details the policies and rules of law of immigration and custody at play in the case. Part IV explains why the …
Birthright Citizenship, Illegal Aliens, And The Original Meaning Of The Citizenship Clause, Matthew Ing
Birthright Citizenship, Illegal Aliens, And The Original Meaning Of The Citizenship Clause, Matthew Ing
Akron Law Review
This Article contends that the orthodox interpretation accurately reflects the original public meaning of ‘jurisdiction,’ and that, consequently, the consensualist interpretation is incorrect on originalist grounds. By way of supporting this contention, this Article also seeks to advance the debate regarding the Citizenship Clause in several ways. Although this Article, like others, relies upon the Clause’s legislative history for evidence of original meaning, when analyzing that history this Article also considers 1) the framing-era context of federal Indian law; and 2) the distinction between “original meaning” and “original expected application.” Moreover, in seeking relevant originalist evidence, this Article looks to …
The Inquisitorial Advantage In Removal Proceedings, Won Kidane
The Inquisitorial Advantage In Removal Proceedings, Won Kidane
Akron Law Review
A thoughtful student once asked an immigration judge during an informal exchange: “If the respondent in your court who has just been found deportable appears to qualify for cancellation of removal but has failed to fill out the form properly, what would you do?” The judge responded matter-of-factly, “I am not his attorney. If the application is not completed properly, I don’t have an application to consider.” It goes without saying that the judge would then order the respondent deported for not submitting a properly completed application for relief. The judge’s response might have seemed harsh or even insensitive to …
Superbias: The Collision Of Behavioral Economics And Implicit Social Cognition, Justin D. Levinson
Superbias: The Collision Of Behavioral Economics And Implicit Social Cognition, Justin D. Levinson
Akron Law Review
This Article explores what happens when behavioral law and economics and implicit social cognition collide, and presents an empirical study designed to test the hypothesis that racial stereotypes overpower behavioral economic phenomena...Section II details behavioral law and economics as well as implicit social cognition. It examines the social science basis of each field and explores the similar cognitive mechanics underlying them. Section III investigates what happens when race is introduced into economic decision-making and considers how racial stereotypes may specifically affect economic decisions already at risk of irrationality. Research has documented that economic decision-making is often discriminatory; new evidence suggests …
Doing Justice In The Face Of A Disaster, John C.P. Goldberg
Doing Justice In The Face Of A Disaster, John C.P. Goldberg
Akron Law Review
What follows is an edited version of comments given at the panel of the AALS Section on Remedies at the AALS annual meeting in January, 2011.
Symposium: Remedies For Big Disasters: The Bp Gulf Oil Spill And The Quest For Complete Justice, Introduction, Tracy A. Thomas
Symposium: Remedies For Big Disasters: The Bp Gulf Oil Spill And The Quest For Complete Justice, Introduction, Tracy A. Thomas
Akron Law Review
This symposium, sponsored by the Remedies Section of the Association of American Law Schools, asks the question of what “complete justice” looks like for remedies and compensation for big disasters like the BP oil spill. The contributors address whether the GCCF fund provides complete justice, and whether it should serve as a precedent for future alternative systems. Their surprising answer on both accounts is no.
Unconventional Responses To Unique Catastrophes, Kenneth R. Feinberg
Unconventional Responses To Unique Catastrophes, Kenneth R. Feinberg
Akron Law Review
Mass disasters sometimes require creative remedies. The tort system may not provide the best means of compensation in unusual situations like the Agent Orange chemical exposure litigation, the Virginia Tech shootings,the attacks of September 11th (“9/11”), and the BP oil spill. Executive compensation after the financial meltdown may also require new, innovative approaches. From my work mediating and administering these cases over the last twenty-five years, I have concluded that such alternative compensation systems are—and should be—rare.
Judging In A Vacuum, Or, Once More, Without Feeling: How Justice Scalia's Jurisprudential Approach Repeats Errors Made In Plessy V. Ferguson, Chris Edelson
Akron Law Review
James Fleming argues that “[Justice Clarence] Thomas’s concurrence in Adarand and dissent in Grutter reflect the Plessy worldview.” I argue in Part V of this article that Justice Antonin Scalia follows the Plessy approach in several of his dissenting opinions. One of this article’s goals is to explain these incongruencies—how can it be that each of these Justices believes he is true to the legacy of Brown, but is inadvertently adopting the reasoning used by the majority in Plessy? The key to resolving this paradox depends on identifying precisely how Plessy went wrong in its reasoning and how Brown corrected …
The Fourteenth Amendment And The Unconstitutionality Of Secession, Daniel A. Farber
The Fourteenth Amendment And The Unconstitutionality Of Secession, Daniel A. Farber
Akron Law Review
To understand fully the relevance of the first two clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to secession, we need to examine the antebellum disputes about citizenship and sovereignty, the subject of Part II below. Issues about citizenship arose in the context of specific disputes about naturalization, expatriation, and the rights of freedmen, but they implicated conflicts over the seat of allegiance and the nature of the Union. Part III turns to the Reconstruction debates and shows how they reflect a fundamentally nationalistic view of citizenship. The Reconstruction Amendments to the Constitution were connected with a powerful vision of national citizenship and …
States' Rights, Southern Hypocrisy, And The Crisis Of The Union, Paul Finkelman
States' Rights, Southern Hypocrisy, And The Crisis Of The Union, Paul Finkelman
Akron Law Review
The southern states did not leave the Union because the national government was trampling on their “rights.” The states that left the union never asserted that they were being denied their “states’ rights” —that the national government had obliterated the lines been between national power and state power. Nor did the southern states complain that the national government was too powerful and so it threatened the sovereignty of the state governments. On the contrary, as I set out below, the southern states mostly complained that the northern states were asserting their states’ rights and that the national government was not …
Secession And Breach Of Compact: The Law Of Nature Meets The United States Constitution, Stephen C. Neff
Secession And Breach Of Compact: The Law Of Nature Meets The United States Constitution, Stephen C. Neff
Akron Law Review
This discussion will briefly outline the legal arguments in favour of the secessionist position. The first section will survey four arguments that could, in theory, have been employed but which, in practice, were used either not at all or only marginally. The second section will survey, in greater detail, the principal argument which was advanced in 1860-61: that secession was a lawful remedy available to the Southern states in the face of material breaches of the Constitutional compact of 1787 by the free states. It will be observed that, in this argument, general considerations of natural law and of the …
James Madison And The Constitution's "Convention For Proposing Amendments", Robert G. Natelson
James Madison And The Constitution's "Convention For Proposing Amendments", Robert G. Natelson
Akron Law Review
The last of the limited-subject interstate gatherings is today the most famous. The Annapolis Convention of 1786 was to focus on “the trade and Commerce of the United States.” Its limited scope induced Madison, who served as a delegate, explicitly to distinguish it from a plenipotentiary convention. For the most part, all of these conventions—today we might call them “task forces”—remained within the scope of their calls. If there was an exception, it was the abortive assembly at Annapolis, and that exception was solely to express the “wish” and “opinion” that another convention be held to consider defects in the …
Still Too Close To Call? Rethinking Stampp's "The Concept Of A Perpetual Union", Daniel W. Hamilton
Still Too Close To Call? Rethinking Stampp's "The Concept Of A Perpetual Union", Daniel W. Hamilton
Akron Law Review
In a classic article in the Journal of American History, which was based on his presidential address to the Organization of American Historians in 1978, the great Civil War historian Kenneth Stampp made the claim that the arguments in favor of the constitutionality of secession made by the Southern states were as strong, if not stronger than the constitutional arguments made, then and now, in opposition to secession. Stampp is to my mind the greatest Civil War historian of the 20th century and his views on secession remain required reading and are cited routinely today. This is not to say …
Symposium: Union And States' Rights: Secession, 150 Years After Sumter, Preface, Neil H. Cogan
Symposium: Union And States' Rights: Secession, 150 Years After Sumter, Preface, Neil H. Cogan
Akron Law Review
A preface to the four papers presented at the Annual Meeting of the Section on Legal History, American Association of Law Schools, held on January 7, 2011, in San Francisco.
Finding Nino: Justice Scalia's Confrontation Clause Legacy From Its (Glorious) Beginning To (Bitter) End, Joëlle Anne Moreno Professor
Finding Nino: Justice Scalia's Confrontation Clause Legacy From Its (Glorious) Beginning To (Bitter) End, Joëlle Anne Moreno Professor
Akron Law Review
Until very recently, Justice Scalia has steered the Court’s modern confrontation jurisprudence. However, as discussed below, his leadership is increasingly threatened by deep divisions on questions of historical accuracy, constitutional interpretation, and the practical realities of twenty-first century criminal prosecutions.
"The Tempest": Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates, P.A. V. Allstate Insurance Co.: The Rules Enabling Act Decision That Added To The Confusion - But Should Not Have, Donald L. Doernberg
"The Tempest": Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates, P.A. V. Allstate Insurance Co.: The Rules Enabling Act Decision That Added To The Confusion - But Should Not Have, Donald L. Doernberg
Akron Law Review
This Article discusses the effect Shady Grove is likely to have on vertical choice-of-law in cases involving a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure...Part II of the Article discusses the majority opinion. Part III deals with parts II-B and II-C of Justice Scalia’s opinion and with the concurrence. Part IV addresses the dissent. Part V offers a critical evaluation of the opinions. Part VI discusses some of the scholarly interpretations of REA and suggests two possible perspectives on REA’s substantive-rights limitation that make it more understandable in light of the Erie doctrine’s history, easier to navigate, and less of a threat …
Reassessing The Avoidance Canon In Erie Cases, Bernadette Bollas Genetin
Reassessing The Avoidance Canon In Erie Cases, Bernadette Bollas Genetin
Akron Law Review
This Article chronicles the Supreme Court’s inconsistent use of an avoidance canon in cases construing the substantive rights limitation of the Rules Enabling Act (Enabling Act or REA). It focuses primarily on the avoidance canon as used in cases under the REA branch of the Erie doctrine but also discusses avoidance in other REA contexts. The Article concludes that a reassessment and refocusing of the avoidance canon in Enabling Act jurisprudence is necessary... This Article explores the purposes and methodology that should guide avoidance in REA cases... I focus, in this Article, primarily on a subset of this group of …
Defining The Word: "Maintain"; Context Counts, Jack Friedenthal
Defining The Word: "Maintain"; Context Counts, Jack Friedenthal
Akron Law Review
To understand what a word means, especially one such as “maintain” that has multiple formal definitions, one must consider the background and purpose for which it is utilized.
The Fruits Of Shady Grove: Seeing The Forest For The Trees, Glenn S. Koppel
The Fruits Of Shady Grove: Seeing The Forest For The Trees, Glenn S. Koppel
Akron Law Review
Part II will sketch the facts of the case to prepare for an exploration of the roots of Shady Grove in Part III, which traces the evolution of the Court’s Erie jurisprudence. At various points along the way, I will stop to anticipate where one or more of the several opinions in Shady Grove will shed light, in Part IV, on the meaning of Shady Grove
Maintaining Uniform Federal Rules: Why The Shady Grove Plurality Was Right, Mark P. Gaber
Maintaining Uniform Federal Rules: Why The Shady Grove Plurality Was Right, Mark P. Gaber
Akron Law Review
This Article examines the Court’s decision in Shady Grove, concluding that Justice Scalia’s plurality opinion has the better argument—his approach is the most consonant with precedent and the least disruptive to the careful balance the Court has struck with its Erie line of cases. Part II examines Justice Scalia’s plurality opinion, and considers its strengths and weaknesses. I then turn to Justice Ginsburg’s dissenting opinion, concluding that it rests on a fundamental misapplication of the Erie doctrine, though she admirably attempts to give teeth to the substantive rights limitation of the Rules Enabling Act—a limitation that the Erie doctrine admittedly …
Shady Grove And The Potential Democracy-Enhancing Benefits Of Erie Formalism, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Shady Grove And The Potential Democracy-Enhancing Benefits Of Erie Formalism, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Akron Law Review
Article written as part of Symposium: Erie Under Advisement: The Doctrine After Shady Grove.
Symposium: Erie Under Advisement: The Doctrine After Shady Grove; Forward: Erie's Gift, Jay Tidmarsh
Symposium: Erie Under Advisement: The Doctrine After Shady Grove; Forward: Erie's Gift, Jay Tidmarsh
Akron Law Review
A forward to the articles in this journal. All the articles manifest concern for the constitutional and structural concerns that animated Erie and its procedural progeny. Several articles, especially those by Professors Doernberg, Koppel, and Stempel examine the jurisprudential commitments underlying the Erie doctrine in general and the various opinions in Shady Grove in particular. Professors Genetin and Friedenthal examine the difficulties of, respectively, statutory and rule interpretation in the Erie context. Professor Koppel emphasizes the value of procedural uniformity. Professor Doernberg evaluates the relationship between the procedural Erie doctrine and concerns for federalism. Mr. Gaber brings some realpolitik to …
Using It For All It's Wuerth: A Critical Analysis Of National Union Fire Insurance Company Of Pittsburgh V. Wuerth As Applied To Medical Malpractice In Ohio, Christy L. Wesig
Using It For All It's Wuerth: A Critical Analysis Of National Union Fire Insurance Company Of Pittsburgh V. Wuerth As Applied To Medical Malpractice In Ohio, Christy L. Wesig
Akron Law Review
This essay discusses the application of this new limitation to the field of medical malpractice, the divergent results reached by Ohio’s appellate courts in the medical negligence and malpractice context since Wuerth, and the various treatments by other jurisdictions. This essay argues that the holding in Wuerth narrowly applies only to law firms, and that applying it to medical malpractice results in a reversal of the settled Ohio law and injustice for those injured by the negligence of medical professionals. Part II examines the history of hospital liability and traces the changes in vicarious liability up to the Wuerth decision. …
Is The Quest For Corporate Responsibility A Wild Goose Chase? The Story Of Lovenheim V. Iroquois Brands, Ltd., D.A. Jeremy Telman
Is The Quest For Corporate Responsibility A Wild Goose Chase? The Story Of Lovenheim V. Iroquois Brands, Ltd., D.A. Jeremy Telman
Akron Law Review
This Article is a Law Story. Law Stories have many purposes, but their main goal is to supplement and demystify the case method of legal pedagogy. The case method has been criticized for presenting students with the law more or less as a fait accompli. The case method assumes a pre-existing body of law that students passively learn rather than learning to think of the law as something that they will have a hand in shaping...In Part II, this Article explores the law of shareholder proposals and the reasons why the SEC and the courts permit proposals relating to social …
Beyond Incentives: Expanding The Theoretical Framework For Patent Law Analysis, Ofer Tur-Sinai
Beyond Incentives: Expanding The Theoretical Framework For Patent Law Analysis, Ofer Tur-Sinai
Akron Law Review
This Article challenges this one-dimensional approach and calls for a more frequent use of non-utilitarian considerations in discussions of the patent system. To be sure, this Article does not call for the complete abolition of economic analysis of patent law, which, despite its shortcomings, remains the most important tool in the evaluation of legal rules in this arena, where the vast majority of the players are motivated primarily by economic considerations. However, it does call for a broader use of non-economic considerations, particularly those embedded in the labor theory and the personality theory, alongside the economic analysis. As will be …
Initial Impressions: Trademark Protection For Abbreviations Of Generic Or Descriptive Terms, Mary Lafrance
Initial Impressions: Trademark Protection For Abbreviations Of Generic Or Descriptive Terms, Mary Lafrance
Akron Law Review
This article compares the approaches which different federal courts have adopted to address the distinctiveness of abbreviations where the underlying expression or information conveyed by the abbreviation is unprotectable either because it is generic or because it is descriptive and lacks secondary meaning. While this study is not intended as a comprehensive survey, it is designed to highlight the inconsistencies in approaches. The article concludes with some observations about the patterns and trends emerging from the unsettled decisional law.