Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (7)
- Criminal Procedure (7)
- Intellectual Property Law (4)
- Election Law (3)
- International Law (3)
-
- Property Law and Real Estate (3)
- State and Local Government Law (3)
- Supreme Court of the United States (3)
- Courts (2)
- Criminal Law (2)
- Education Law (2)
- Family Law (2)
- First Amendment (2)
- Immigration Law (2)
- Jurisdiction (2)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (2)
- Privacy Law (2)
- Science and Technology Law (2)
- Torts (2)
- Administrative Law (1)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (1)
- Artificial Intelligence and Robotics (1)
- Banking and Finance Law (1)
- Business (1)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1)
- Computer Law (1)
- Computer Sciences (1)
- Education (1)
- Entrepreneurial and Small Business Operations (1)
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Law (4)
- Criminal Justice System (4)
- Prosecutors (4)
- Decision Making in Prosecution (3)
- Intellectual Property (3)
-
- Judicial Reform (3)
- Patents (3)
- Statutory Interpretation (3)
- United States Constitution 1st Amendment (3)
- Criminal Procedure (2)
- Due Process of Law (2)
- Election Law (2)
- Eminent Domain (2)
- Federal Courts (2)
- Freedom of Speech (2)
- Home Schooling (2)
- International Law (2)
- Progressivism (2)
- Property Rights (2)
- Rule of Law (2)
- Torts (2)
- United States Supreme Court (2)
- Adversary System (1)
- Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (1)
- American Civil Liberties Union (1)
- Antitrust Law (1)
- Appellate Courts (1)
- Appellate Jurisdiction (1)
- Appellate Procedure (1)
- Artificial Intelligence (1)
Articles 31 - 32 of 32
Full-Text Articles in Law
Free Speech Idealism, Timothy Zick
Digital Internment, Margaret Hu
Digital Internment, Margaret Hu
Faculty Publications
In Korematsu, Hirabayashi, and the Second Monster, Eric L. Muller explores whether Korematsu v. United States is dead post-Trump v. Hawaii, and whether by failing to strike down Hirabayashi v. United States, the “mother” of Korematsu and a “second monster” lives on. This brief response Essay contends that answering these questions first demands grasping how Trump v. Hawaiifailed to fully address the program implemented by the Muslim Ban–Travel Ban: Extreme Vetting. Extreme Vetting can be characterized as a form of “digital internment” through a complex web of cybersurveillance, administrative-imposed restraints, and “identity-management” rationales that are …