Law Commons^™

University Of Richmond Bulletin: Catalog Of The T.C. Williams School Of Law For 1960-1961, University Of Richmond

Law School Catalogues

General Statement:

The Law School was established as a part of Richmond College in 1870. In 1890 the family of the late Mr. T. C. Williams, who had been a devoted and useful trustee, donated $25,000 as the nucleus of an endowment for the Law School. In recognition of this gift, the name of the School was changed to The T. C. Williams School of Law. At various times the School has received further generous gifts from members of the family of Mr. Williams. A substantial gift came through a bequest from Mr. T. C. Williams, Jr. who, like his …

The Broker's Claim To A Commission When His Customer Buys Through Another Broker, William S. Cudlipp Jr.

University of Richmond Law Review

Very few lawyers in general practice in Virginia have not been consulted at one time or another about the right of a real estate broker to collect a commission on a sale of property consummated directly by the owner or through another broker with a customer found by the first broker. The majority of the disputes of this nature never reach the courts and undoubtedly the great majority of those that do are finally settled at the trial court level. Nevertheless the Virginia reports contain a number of decisions involving such cases, and opposite results have sometimes been reached under …

The Issuance Of Stock Under Section 1244 Of The Internal Revenue Code, Carle E. Davis

University of Richmond Law Review

The purpose of this brief note is to examine the provisions of section 1244 with a view toward qualifying for the tax benefits of that section.

Foreword, William T. Muse

University of Richmond Law Review

The articles in the Law Notes are prepared by members of the faculty of the University of Richmond Law School. They are intended to be both practical and brief, with a minimum of references. We hope that the profession has found them helpful.

Revocation And Revival Of Wills In Virginia, James H. Barnett Jr.

University of Richmond Law Review

Kate Miller Levring executed two wills, the first in 1954, the second in 1955. The latter contained an express revocation clause. Following her death the second will which was last traced to her possession could not be found, thus giving rise to a strong presumption that she had destroyed it with intent to revoke. In an inter-partes proceeding, the executor named in the first will, offered that will for probate. Probate was contested by certain next of kin of the deceased. The only evidence introduced was a statement by the decedent that she planned to make certain undisclosed changes in …

University Of Richmond Law Notes, J. Westwood Smithers

University of Richmond Law Review

No abstract provided.