Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Civil Procedure (16)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (5)
- Courts (3)
- Administrative Law (2)
- Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law (2)
-
- Leadership Studies (2)
- Litigation (2)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (2)
- Arts and Humanities (1)
- Bankruptcy Law (1)
- Commercial Law (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Environmental Law (1)
- Estates and Trusts (1)
- History (1)
- Judges (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Labor and Employment Law (1)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (1)
- Law and Gender (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Legal Education (1)
- Legal History (1)
- Legal Writing and Research (1)
- Natural Resources Law (1)
- Other Law (1)
- Property Law and Real Estate (1)
- Religion Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- CJRA (5)
- Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990 (4)
- F.R.C.P. Rule 11 (4)
- Montana (4)
- Donation Act (2)
-
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (2)
- Native Americans (2)
- Pennoyer v. Neff (2)
- 28 U.S.C. § 1367 (1)
- AND GOOD FAITH PURCHASERS (1)
- Abortion (1)
- Access to Justice Act (1)
- Administrative law judges (1)
- Analysis (1)
- Bankruptcy Code (1)
- Bankruptcy policy (1)
- Business debtor (1)
- CREDITORS (1)
- Cases (1)
- Chapter 11 (1)
- Civil Justice Reform act of 1990 (1)
- Civil Rights Act of 1991 (1)
- Civil Rules Advisory Committee (1)
- Civil justice reform (1)
- Civil liberties (1)
- Civil procedure (1)
- Civil rights (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1)
- Debtors (1)
Articles 31 - 32 of 32
Full-Text Articles in Law
Civil Rights Conundrum, Carl W. Tobias
Civil Rights Conundrum, Carl W. Tobias
Law Faculty Publications
As a case study of the impediments imposed by the revised F.R.C.P. Rule 11 in civil rights litigation, Professor Tobias relates the story of the Robeson County, N.C. prosecution of Eddie Hatcher and Timothy Jacobs, their subsequent civil rights action, and the ensuing Rule 11 sanctions imposed upon their counsel, as reported in In re Kunstler, 914 F.2d 505 (4th Cir. 1990).
Sin, Scandal, And Substantive Due Process, Wendy Collins Perdue
Sin, Scandal, And Substantive Due Process, Wendy Collins Perdue
Law Faculty Publications
For students of civil procedure, the names Pennoyer and Neff evoke these dry facts: In an initial suit, one J.H. Mitchell sued Neff in Oregon state court. Because Neff could not be found within Oregon, he was served by publication. Neff never appeared, and a default judgment was entered against him. To satisfy the judgment, Mitchell attached Neff's Oregon real estate. The property was sold at auction, and Pennoyer later acquired it. Nearly a decade later, Neff returned to Oregon and brought suit in federal court to evict Pennoyer from the land, claiming that the original judgment was invalid. The …