Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 30 of 165

Full-Text Articles in Law

Volume 42 (Annual Report 2018) Jun 2018

Volume 42 (Annual Report 2018)

Transcript

No abstract provided.


Volume 41, Issue 2 (Winter 2018) Jan 2018

Volume 41, Issue 2 (Winter 2018)

Transcript

No abstract provided.


Volume 41, Issue 1 (Spring 2017) Apr 2017

Volume 41, Issue 1 (Spring 2017)

Transcript

No abstract provided.


Volume 40, Issue 2 (Fall 2016) Oct 2016

Volume 40, Issue 2 (Fall 2016)

Transcript

No abstract provided.


Volume 40, Issue 1 (Spring 2016) Apr 2016

Volume 40, Issue 1 (Spring 2016)

Transcript

No abstract provided.


Volume 39, Issue 2 (Fall 2015) Oct 2015

Volume 39, Issue 2 (Fall 2015)

Transcript

No abstract provided.


Volume 39, Issue 1 (Spring 2015) Apr 2015

Volume 39, Issue 1 (Spring 2015)

Transcript

No abstract provided.


Volume 38, Issue 2 (Fall 2014) Oct 2014

Volume 38, Issue 2 (Fall 2014)

Transcript

No abstract provided.


Volume 38, Issue 1 (Spring 2014) Apr 2014

Volume 38, Issue 1 (Spring 2014)

Transcript

No abstract provided.


Amendment 2 And Its Effect On Missourians' Free Exercise Of Religion, Mishelle Martinez Jan 2014

Amendment 2 And Its Effect On Missourians' Free Exercise Of Religion, Mishelle Martinez

Missouri Law Review

This Comment provides a thorough analysis of Amendment 2. The primary issue addressed is whether Amendment 2 will have an impact on Missourians' religious freedoms or whether Amendment 2 merely reaffirms rights already granted under the old article I, section 5 of the Missouri Constitution. If Amendment 2 does add new rights, an analysis of whether such rights are in accord with the First Amendment is required. Part II outlines the legislative history, text, and general commentary on the key provisions of Amendment 2. In Part III, all new provisions under Amendment 2 are analyzed in light of the legal …


Other Missouri Model: Systemic Juvenile Injustice In The Show-Me State, The, Mae C. Quinn Nov 2013

Other Missouri Model: Systemic Juvenile Injustice In The Show-Me State, The, Mae C. Quinn

Missouri Law Review

Part II of this Article examines some of the most well-known claims about the Missouri Model of juvenile justice, clarifying that the positive press to date actually describes only one small component of the larger juvenile justice structure: Missouri’s system of residential correction for state-placed adjudicated youth. And while that system has much to admire and replicate, it also has room for improvement In Part III, this Article fills in what has been left out of most public and press stories about Missouri’s larger youth justice system. That is, despite mostly glowing media accounts, Missouri’s at-risk youth are poorly served …


Volume 37, Issue 2 (Fall 2013) Oct 2013

Volume 37, Issue 2 (Fall 2013)

Transcript

No abstract provided.


Exclusively Confusing: Who Has Jurisdiction To Determine Jurisdiction Under The Missouri Workers' Compensation Law, N. Drew Kemp Jun 2013

Exclusively Confusing: Who Has Jurisdiction To Determine Jurisdiction Under The Missouri Workers' Compensation Law, N. Drew Kemp

Missouri Law Review

In 2011, the Eastern District of the Missouri Court of Appeals summarized and clarified the issue of which court has jurisdiction to determine jurisdiction. After Cooper v. Chrysler Group, LLC, it is clear that a Missouri circuit court must yield to the Commission when the jurisdiction-determining issue is one of fact. However, a circuit court can nevertheless review jurisdictional issues of law. An important question remains, however: will a circuit court distinguish between issues of fact and issues of law if an affirmative defense is not timely raised by the employer?


Volume 37, Issue 1 (Spring 2013) Apr 2013

Volume 37, Issue 1 (Spring 2013)

Transcript

No abstract provided.


Delicate Balancing Of Paternalism And Freedom To Contract: The Evolving Law Of Unconscionability In Missouri, A Law Summary , Scott Lee Smithson Jr. Jan 2013

Delicate Balancing Of Paternalism And Freedom To Contract: The Evolving Law Of Unconscionability In Missouri, A Law Summary , Scott Lee Smithson Jr.

Missouri Law Review

The contracts defense of unconscionability – infrequently exercised and less frequently successful – requires that a contractual provision be so odious that it “shocks the conscience” of the adjudicator. Case law suggests that during the last century, unconscionability has been argued successfully less than twenty times in the state of Missouri. The nature of an overall unconscionability analysis is rather tenuous, given that the defense is highly fact intensive, and a range of factors, rather than elements, controls. Despite this, Missouri courts had applied a uniform test in nearly every contract situation for decades, including contracts whose terms included a …


Cloaking A Challenge To Missouri's Marriage Amendment With A Challenge For Survivor Benefits, Benjamin S. Harner Nov 2012

Cloaking A Challenge To Missouri's Marriage Amendment With A Challenge For Survivor Benefits, Benjamin S. Harner

Missouri Law Review

This Law Summary focuses on Glossip’s ongoing challenge to receive survivor benefits. The case not only implicates the Missouri Constitution’s equal protection and due process clauses, but it is also controversial because it involves the same-sex marriage issues that have stirred national debate for quite some time. This Law Summary will discuss each of these issues. Specifically, Part II provides the legal background for Missouri’s equal protection and substantive due process clauses and provides case law pertaining to situations similar to Glossip’s that have arisen in other states. Part III provides a more in-depth background of Glossip’s lawsuit, focusing on …


Volume 36, Issue 2 (Fall 2012) Oct 2012

Volume 36, Issue 2 (Fall 2012)

Transcript

No abstract provided.


Pulling The Taxpayer's Sword From The Stone: The Appropriation Requirement Of Missouri's Hancock Amendment, Jonathan G. Bremer Apr 2012

Pulling The Taxpayer's Sword From The Stone: The Appropriation Requirement Of Missouri's Hancock Amendment, Jonathan G. Bremer

Missouri Law Review

On November 4, 1980, Missouri voters approved the Hancock Amendment (Hancock) to Missouri's Constitution. Hancock addressed voter concerns as to whether state and local governments could keep their taxing and spending in check. The amendment contains two principle aspects. First, Hancock limits state and local governments in their ability to increase taxation, revenue, and spending without voter approval. Second, Hancock prohibits the state from imposing "unfunded mandates" upon its political subdivisions - closing a loophole that would otherwise allow the state to circumvent its duty not to raise taxes or spending above a certain level without a vote of the …


Protecting The Living And The Dead: How Missouri Can Enact A Constitutional Funeral-Protest Statute, Madison Marcolla Apr 2012

Protecting The Living And The Dead: How Missouri Can Enact A Constitutional Funeral-Protest Statute, Madison Marcolla

Missouri Law Review

This Note will analyze the constitutionality of Missouri's funeral-protest statutes under the First Amendment. This Note argues that, with certain changes, Missouri's funeral-protest statutes should pass constitutional muster. In Part II, this Note analyzes the facts and holding of Phelps-Roper v. Koster. Next, in Part III, this Note explores the legal background of the First Amendment, time, place, and manner restrictions, and how other courts have decided cases involving funeral-protest laws. Part IV examines the court's rationale in Phelps-Roper v. Koster. Lastly, Part V explains where the district court erred and how Missouri's funeral-protest statutes can be changed to become …


Volume 36, Issue 1 (Spring 2012) Apr 2012

Volume 36, Issue 1 (Spring 2012)

Transcript

No abstract provided.


Missouri's Foggy Fog Line Law, Charity Whitney Jan 2012

Missouri's Foggy Fog Line Law, Charity Whitney

Missouri Law Review

When told that crossing the fog line is not sufficient grounds for a traffic stop in Missouri, most people will answer, "What is the fog line?" Though the term may be unfamiliar to many, anyone who drives would recognize the object to which it refers - the white or yellow line on the side of the road that indicates the end of the lane and the beginning of the shoulder. Fog lines have been the subject of much civil and criminal litigation in Missouri, at both the state and federal levels. Crossing a fog line is a traffic violation for …


Defending The Historic Preservation Tax Credit, Lauren K. Shores Jan 2012

Defending The Historic Preservation Tax Credit, Lauren K. Shores

Missouri Law Review

Part II of this Comment discusses Missouri's historic preservation tax credit, and supplementing the discussion is some background on the federal rehabilitation tax credit. Part III explains how an historic preservation tax credit statute can be structured and outlines the advantages and disadvantages of these structural aspects. In addition, it discusses how historic preservation tax credits can be used as a redevelopment tool and the economic impact that these credits have had in Missouri. Part III of this Comment will review the recommendations made by the Tax Credit Commission appointed by Missouri Governor Jay Nixon. Finally, in Part IV, this …


Volume 35, Issue 2 (Fall 2011) Oct 2011

Volume 35, Issue 2 (Fall 2011)

Transcript

No abstract provided.


Volume 35, Issue 1 (Spring 2011) Apr 2011

Volume 35, Issue 1 (Spring 2011)

Transcript

No abstract provided.


Missouri Revised Statutes Section 490.715: A Toothless Attempt To Limit The Recovery Of Medical Expense Write-Offs, Alexander Cornwell Apr 2011

Missouri Revised Statutes Section 490.715: A Toothless Attempt To Limit The Recovery Of Medical Expense Write-Offs, Alexander Cornwell

Missouri Law Review

This Article focuses objectively on whether the decision to limit the application of the collateral source rule in Missouri is in accord with modem trends and whether Missouri courts' recent interpretation of section 490.715 is consistent with the legislature's original intent. Part 1I reviews the history of the collateral source doctrine and the justifications supporting its retention. In Part IlI, this Article outlines the Missouri legislature's decision to modify the rule and analyzes subsequent court decisions applying section 490.715. In response to the recent legislative and judicial activity, Part IV concludes that modification of the collateral source doctrine was warranted …


Volume 34, Issue 2 (Fall 2010) Oct 2010

Volume 34, Issue 2 (Fall 2010)

Transcript

No abstract provided.


Volume 34, Issue 1 (Spring 2010) Apr 2010

Volume 34, Issue 1 (Spring 2010)

Transcript

No abstract provided.


Volume 33, Issue 2 (Fall 2009) Oct 2009

Volume 33, Issue 2 (Fall 2009)

Transcript

No abstract provided.


Volume 33, Issue 1 (Spring 2009) Apr 2009

Volume 33, Issue 1 (Spring 2009)

Transcript

No abstract provided.


Volume 32, Issue 2 (Fall 2008) Oct 2008

Volume 32, Issue 2 (Fall 2008)

Transcript

No abstract provided.