Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Publication Year
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 17 of 17
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Idea And The Use Of Mediation And Collaborative Dispute Resolution In Due Process Disputes, Katherine Mcmurtrey
The Idea And The Use Of Mediation And Collaborative Dispute Resolution In Due Process Disputes, Katherine Mcmurtrey
Journal of Dispute Resolution
This Comment discusses the future of alternative dispute resolution in special education conflicts by first examining a brief history of the IDEA and the areas it covers. Due process complaints under the IDEA and mediation as a solution to due process complaints will then be addressed. Then, it will focus on mediation and its impact on parents and schools, particularly the advantages and disadvantages of mediation, and the presence of attorneys in mediation. Finally, it will look towards collaborative law, when two attorneys and their clients collaborate to reach an agreement, and the future of collaborative dispute resolution in the …
Notice(Ing) Ex-Offenders: A Case Study Of The Manifest Injustice Of Passively Violating A "Felon-In-Possession" Statute, S. David Mitchell
Notice(Ing) Ex-Offenders: A Case Study Of The Manifest Injustice Of Passively Violating A "Felon-In-Possession" Statute, S. David Mitchell
Faculty Publications
Changing a law and criminalizing formerly legal conduct without providing notice of the change and without providing a reasonable period of time for the offending individual to comply with the change not only violates due process but is also manifestly unjust, especially given the scope and breadth of the collateral consequences that attach upon a felony conviction, such as the loss of the right to vote, to serve on a jury, or to receive certain benefits. With the far-reaching impact of a felony conviction on all areas of an individual's life, the maxim that "ignorance of the law excuses no …
Systemic Barriers To Effective Assistance Of Counsel In Plea Bargaining, Rodney J. Uphoff, Peter A. Joy
Systemic Barriers To Effective Assistance Of Counsel In Plea Bargaining, Rodney J. Uphoff, Peter A. Joy
Faculty Publications
In a trio of recent cases, Padilla v. Kentucky, Missouri v. Frye, and Lafler v. Cooper, the U.S. Supreme Court has focused its attention on defense counsel's pivotal role during the plea bargaining process . At the same time that the Court has signaled its willingness to consider ineffective assistance of counsel claims at the plea stage, prosecutors are increasingly requiring defendants to sign waivers that include waiving all constitutional and procedural errors, even unknown ineffective assistance of counsel claims such as those that proved successful in Padilla and Frye. Had Jose Padilla and Galin Frye been forced to sign …
Limits Of Procedural Choice Of Law, S. I. Strong
Limits Of Procedural Choice Of Law, S. I. Strong
Faculty Publications
Commercial parties have long enjoyed significant autonomy in questions of substantive law. However, litigants do not have anywhere near the same amount of freedom to decide procedural matters. Instead, parties in litigation are generally considered to be subject to the procedural law of the forum court.
Although this particular conflict of laws rule has been in place for many years, a number of recent developments have challenged courts and commentators to consider whether and to what extent procedural rules should be considered mandatory in nature. If procedural rules are not mandatory but are instead merely “sticky” defaults, then it may …
How Not To Criminalize Cyberbullying, Lyrissa Lidsky, Andrea Pinzon Garcia
How Not To Criminalize Cyberbullying, Lyrissa Lidsky, Andrea Pinzon Garcia
Missouri Law Review
This essay provides a sustained constitutional critique of the growing body of laws criminalizing cyberbullying. These laws typically proceed by either modernizing existing harassment and stalking laws or crafting new criminal offenses. Both paths are beset with First Amendment perils, which this essay illustrates through 'case studies' of selected legislative efforts. Though sympathetic to the aims of these new laws, this essay contends that reflexive criminalization in response to tragic cyberbullying incidents has led law-makers to conflate cyberbullying as a social problem with cyberbullying as a criminal problem, creating pernicious consequences. The legislative zeal to eradicate cyberbullying potentially produces disproportionate …
Debacle: How The Supreme Court Has Mangled American Sentencing Law And How It Might Yet Be Mended, Frank O. Bowman Iii
Debacle: How The Supreme Court Has Mangled American Sentencing Law And How It Might Yet Be Mended, Frank O. Bowman Iii
Faculty Publications
This Article argues that the line of Supreme Court Sixth Amendment jury right cases that began with McMillan v. Pennsylvania in 1986, crescendoed in Blakely v. Washington and United States v. Booker in 2004-2005, and continued in 2009 in cases such as Oregon v. Ice, has been a colossal judicial failure. First, the Court has failed to provide a logically coherent, constitutionally based answer to the fundamental question of what limits the Constitution places on the roles played by the institutional actors in the criminal justice system. It failed to recognize that defining, adjudicating and punishing crimes implicates both the …
Due Process Forgotten: The Problem Of Statutory Damages And Class Actions, Sheila B. Scheuerman
Due Process Forgotten: The Problem Of Statutory Damages And Class Actions, Sheila B. Scheuerman
Missouri Law Review
Part II examines the theoretical rationale underlying both statutory damages and class actions: making individual claims marketable. This Part explains how combining the class action with statutory damages invites overdeterrence, a fact aptly demonstrated by the FACTA class actions. Part III describes the constitutional framework for analyzing constitutional excessiveness under the Due Process Clause. This Part shows how the modem due process standard for punitive damages - known as the BMW guideposts - in fact evolved from a test developed in early Supreme Court precedent analyzing the constitutional limits on statutory damages. Part IV examines modem judicial treatment of due …
Punitive Damages And Due Process: Trying To Keep Up With The United States Supreme Court After Philip Morris Usa V. Williams , Tyler C. Schaeffer
Punitive Damages And Due Process: Trying To Keep Up With The United States Supreme Court After Philip Morris Usa V. Williams , Tyler C. Schaeffer
Missouri Law Review
Throughout the past two decades, the United States Supreme Court has gradually formed several procedural and substantive protections under the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause limiting the size of punitive damages a State can award against civil defendants. The Court has made it clear that the catalyst for the recent constitutional doctrine stems from its concern towards punitive damages that "run wild." What has not been as clear is what prior constitutional authority the Court has drawn from when creating these new rules. Consequently, state courts, left with little guidance, have struggled with applying as well as predicting the evolving …
Application Of Due Process To Arbitration Awards Of Punitive Damages - Where Is The State Action, The, Charles Smith
Application Of Due Process To Arbitration Awards Of Punitive Damages - Where Is The State Action, The, Charles Smith
Journal of Dispute Resolution
This article will analyze why the position of the courts-no state action-is correct. Specifically, this article will take the position that the policy of finality traditionally found in arbitration law must trump any constitutional inquiries. This is because arbitration is ultimately based on the parties' agreement, which inevitably recites that the arbitrator's decision shall be final and, in any event, this finality is generally implied.
Second Amendment Incorporation Through The Fourteenth Amendment Privileges Or Immunities And Due Process Clauses, Michael Anthony Lawrence
Second Amendment Incorporation Through The Fourteenth Amendment Privileges Or Immunities And Due Process Clauses, Michael Anthony Lawrence
Missouri Law Review
The Second Amendment, alternately maligned over the years as the black sheep of the constitutional family and praised as a palladium of the liberties of a republic, should be recognized by the United States Supreme Court to apply to the several States through the Fourteenth Amendment privileges or immunities clause or, alternatively, through the due process clause. This article suggests that the issue of Second Amendment incorporation presents a useful contemporary mechanism for the Court to revive the longdormant Fourteenth Amendment privileges or immunities clause. Such judicial recognition of the clause is necessary to respect the Framers' vision, as inspired …
Stretching The Fourteenth Amendment And Substantive Due Process: Another Close Call For 42 U.S.C. 1983, Brad K. Thoenen
Stretching The Fourteenth Amendment And Substantive Due Process: Another Close Call For 42 U.S.C. 1983, Brad K. Thoenen
Missouri Law Review
Forty years ago, Justice John Harlan noted that the United State Constitution "is not a panacea for every blot upon the public welfare, nor [is the] Court . . .a general haven for reform movements." Written during an era of judicial progressivism, Justice Harlan's words capture perfectly the essence of the Eighth Circuit's majority opinion in Terrell v. Larson, a recent substantive due process case from Minnesota. Substantive due process claims often tug at the heartstrings of our jurisprudence, and Terrell is certainly no exception. This Note will explore the legal foundations and policy implications of Terrell and attempt to …
Function Over Formalism: A Provisional Theory Of The Constitutional Law Of Crime And Punishment, Frank O. Bowman Iii
Function Over Formalism: A Provisional Theory Of The Constitutional Law Of Crime And Punishment, Frank O. Bowman Iii
Faculty Publications
This Article is, in effect, the second half of the author's argument against the Supreme Court's interpretation of the Sixth Amendment in Blakely v. Washington. The first half appeared in "Train Wreck? Or Can the Federal Sentencing System Be Saved? A Plea for Rapid Reversal of Blakely v. Washington," 41 American Criminal Law Review 217 (2004), and made a pragmatic, consequentialist argument against the Blakely result. This Article takes the next step of providing an alternative constitutional model of criminal sentencing to that offered by Justice Scalia in Blakely. The model emphasizes that a good constitutional model should pay particular …
The Case Of A Lifetime, Richard C. Reuben
The Case Of A Lifetime, Richard C. Reuben
Faculty Publications
There is great difficulty in defining pro bono lawyering. The classic model is the practitioner who devotes time to representing a client in a civil or criminal matter. But some consider other legal relationships pro bono as well, such as service on the boards of directors of nonprofit organizations, legal work at reduced fees, and activities that improve the law and legal profession. In the case of organizations such as the ACLU and the NAACP LDF, pro bono means a mixture of much of the above, as public interest law firms work hand in hand with private lawyers and firms …
Antipsychotic Medication And The Criminal Defendant: Problems Persist Despite A Dose Of Due Process, Brian J. Doherty
Antipsychotic Medication And The Criminal Defendant: Problems Persist Despite A Dose Of Due Process, Brian J. Doherty
Missouri Law Review
Involuntary administration of antipsychotic drugs also raises difficult legal issues within the domain of criminal law. Because antipsychotic drugs affect thought processes, when psychiatrists acting on behalf of the state administer these drugs to a criminal defendant, the state is controlling that defendant's mind to some extent. In Riggins v. Nevada, the United States Supreme Court recognized constitutional protection against involuntarily treating pretrial detainees with antipsychotic drugs. This Note will analyze the Court's decision and discuss unresolved problems concerning the effects of antipsychotic medication on the criminally accused.
Statutory Prohibitions On The Negotiation Of Insurance Agent Commissions: Substantive Due Process Review Under State Constitutions, Robert H. Jerry Ii, Reginald L. Robinson
Statutory Prohibitions On The Negotiation Of Insurance Agent Commissions: Substantive Due Process Review Under State Constitutions, Robert H. Jerry Ii, Reginald L. Robinson
Faculty Publications
In Part I, this Article examines and categorizes the state statutes that prohibit an insurance agent from returning a portion of his commission for the sale of the policy to the consumer. Part II discusses substantive due process' in the state courts. After briefly summarizing the rise and fall of federal substantive due process, this part explores the use of state constitutions as independent constitutional authority in the area of economic regulation. This part concludes that two distinct models of substantive due process analysis exist in the state courts. Part III comments on two recent cases where the validity of …
Labor Arbitration And State Wrongful Discharge Actions: Due Process Or Remedial Double Dipping - Lingle V. Norge Division Of Magic Chef, Inc., John Porter Hoel
Labor Arbitration And State Wrongful Discharge Actions: Due Process Or Remedial Double Dipping - Lingle V. Norge Division Of Magic Chef, Inc., John Porter Hoel
Journal of Dispute Resolution
This note will explore the history of Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act 6 (LMRA) and the preemption doctrine, the development of the wrongful discharge action, the case history involving union employees filing state actions for wrongful discharge, and the effect the Lingle decision will have on business, the judicial system and, most importantly, the body politic of the individual states. Emphasis will be placed on the important role the state legislature will play in determining the exact ramifications of the Supreme Court's decision. Finally, the note will outline and discuss four main options state legislatures have when …
Preliminary Hearing--Better Alternatives Or More Of The Same, The, Gary L. Anderson
Preliminary Hearing--Better Alternatives Or More Of The Same, The, Gary L. Anderson
Missouri Law Review
The first part of this article analyzes the preliminary hearing as a working institution. The second part sets out and evaluates current proposals and prospects for improving the hearing through reform. In the third part a set of alternative procedures is proposed which might function better than a judicial hearing with multiple functions, and comparisons are made with present and proposed hearing procedures. Throughout the article it will be assumed that any proposal for reform should fairly and effectively protect the interests of the accused while respecting the needs of law enforcement. In addition, any proposal for reform should take …