Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

University of Missouri School of Law

Clayton Act

Articles 1 - 2 of 2

Full-Text Articles in Law

Mere Common Ownership And The Antitrust Laws, Thomas A. Lambert Nov 2020

Mere Common Ownership And The Antitrust Laws, Thomas A. Lambert

Faculty Publications

"Common ownership," also called "horizontal shareholding," refers to a stock investor's ownership of minority stakes in multiple competing firms. Recent empirical studies have purported to show that institutional investors' common ownership reduces competition among commonly owned competitors. "Mere common ownership" is horizontal shareholding that is not accompanied by any sort of illicit agreement, such as a hub-and-spoke conspiracy, or the holding of a control-conferring stake. This Article considers the legality of mere common ownership under the U.S. antitrust laws. Prominent antitrust scholars and the leading treatise have concluded that mere common ownership that has the incidental effect of lessening market …


Indirect Purchaser Doctrine: Antecedent Transaction, The, Jill S. Kingsbury Apr 2000

Indirect Purchaser Doctrine: Antecedent Transaction, The, Jill S. Kingsbury

Missouri Law Review

Section Four of the Clayton Act,2 the treble-damage action provision of the federal antitrust laws, was intended to foster and encourage competition by allowing private enforcement of the antitrust laws. The ever-present threat of a private action for treble-damages serves as a deterrent to anyone contemplating business activities in violation of the antitrust laws and offers the possibility of compensation to victims injured by anti-competitive activities.3 The Supreme Court's decision in illinois Brick Co. v. lllinois4 defined the reach of the trebledamage provision by holding that only direct purchasers of illegally monopolized products or services have standing to sue under …