Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Supreme Court of the United States (11)
- Courts (8)
- Constitutional Law (7)
- Legislation (7)
- Tax Law (7)
-
- State and Local Government Law (6)
- Taxation-Federal (6)
- Business Organizations Law (5)
- Criminal Law (5)
- Criminal Procedure (5)
- International Law (5)
- Legal Profession (5)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (4)
- Juvenile Law (4)
- Law and Economics (4)
- Legal Biography (4)
- Legal Education (4)
- Legal Writing and Research (4)
- Science and Technology Law (4)
- Taxation-Transnational (4)
- Administrative Law (3)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (3)
- Environmental Law (3)
- Evidence (3)
- Family Law (3)
- Health Law and Policy (3)
- Human Rights Law (3)
- Intellectual Property Law (3)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (3)
- Keyword
-
- United States Supreme Court (11)
- Empirical studies (6)
- Income tax (6)
- Decision making (5)
- Authority (4)
-
- Case studies (4)
- Congress (4)
- Damages (4)
- Law professors (4)
- Law reform (4)
- Lawyers (4)
- University of Michigan Law School (4)
- Child welfare (3)
- Class actions (3)
- Clients (3)
- Constitutional violations (3)
- Corporations (3)
- Deterrence (3)
- Doctors (3)
- Federal agencies (3)
- Foreign income (3)
- Language (3)
- Multinational enterprises (3)
- Residences (3)
- Scholarship (3)
- Tax reform (3)
- Accountability (2)
- Admissibility (2)
- Advocacy (2)
- Agency interpretations (2)
Articles 61 - 61 of 61
Full-Text Articles in Law
Noncompliance, Nonenforcement, Nonproblem? Rethinking The Anticommons In Biomedical Research, Rebecca S. Eisenberg
Noncompliance, Nonenforcement, Nonproblem? Rethinking The Anticommons In Biomedical Research, Rebecca S. Eisenberg
Articles
A decade ago the biomedical research community was sounding alarm bells about the impact of intellectual property (IP) rights on the ability of scientists to do their work. Controversies and delays in negotiating terms of access to patented mice and genes, databases of scientific information, and tangible research materials all pointed toward the same conclusion: that IP claims were undermining traditional sharing norms to the detriment of science. Michael Heller and I highlighted one dimension of this concern: that too many IP rights in "upstream" research results could paradoxically restrict "downstream" research and product development by making it too costly …