Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Environmental Law (6)
- Legal History (6)
- International Law (4)
- Banking and Finance Law (2)
- Business Organizations Law (2)
-
- Commercial Law (2)
- Contracts (2)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (2)
- Arts and Humanities (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Ethics and Political Philosophy (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Law and Politics (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Philosophy (1)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (1)
- Secured Transactions (1)
- Publication
-
- Robert Percival (6)
- Brian M McCall (3)
- Daniel R. Coquillette (2)
- David S. Bogen (2)
- Mark Graber (2)
-
- O. Carter Snead (2)
- Benjamin J Lozano (1)
- Christopher W. Schmidt (1)
- David K. Millon (1)
- Eric B Easton (1)
- Herbert Hovenkamp (1)
- Juliet P Stumpf (1)
- Louis J. Sirico Jr. (1)
- Margreth Barrett (1)
- Mark Fenster (1)
- Nicola Lacey (1)
- Rebecca E Zietlow (1)
- Robert C. Deal (1)
- Robert N. Strassfeld (1)
- Ryan M. Riegg (1)
- File Type
Articles 31 - 31 of 31
Full-Text Articles in Law
Fitting Punishment, Juliet P. Stumpf
Fitting Punishment, Juliet P. Stumpf
Juliet P Stumpf
Proportionality is conspicuously absent from the legal framework for immigration sanctions. Immigration law relies on one sanction – deportation – as the ubiquitous penalty for any immigration violation. Neither the gravity of the violation nor the harm that results bears on whether deportation is the consequence for an immigration violation. Immigration law stands alone in the legal landscape in this respect. Criminal punishment incorporates proportionality when imposing sentences that are graduated based on the gravity of the offense; contract and tort law provide for damages that are graduated based on the harm to others or to society. This Article represents …