Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 9 of 9

Full-Text Articles in Law

Harris V. Reed: A New Look At Federal Habeas Jurisdiction Over State Petitioners, Jason M. Halper Jan 1989

Harris V. Reed: A New Look At Federal Habeas Jurisdiction Over State Petitioners, Jason M. Halper

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.


Transportation Of State Prisoners To Their Federal Civil Rights Actions, Mark K. Dietrich Jan 1985

Transportation Of State Prisoners To Their Federal Civil Rights Actions, Mark K. Dietrich

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.


Resolving Inconsistencies In Federal Special Verdicts Jan 1985

Resolving Inconsistencies In Federal Special Verdicts

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.


Preemption Of Anticompetitive State Statutes By Section 1 Of The Sherman Act: Is An Agreement Required?, Anders Laren Jan 1985

Preemption Of Anticompetitive State Statutes By Section 1 Of The Sherman Act: Is An Agreement Required?, Anders Laren

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Propriety Of Hearing Railway Labor Grievances And Fair Representation Claims In Federal Court, Sandra Katz Jan 1982

The Propriety Of Hearing Railway Labor Grievances And Fair Representation Claims In Federal Court, Sandra Katz

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.


State Evidentiary Privileges In Federal Civil Litigation, Martin I. Kaminsky Jan 1975

State Evidentiary Privileges In Federal Civil Litigation, Martin I. Kaminsky

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.


Criminal Law-Multiple Jury Joint Trials-On The Joint Trial Of Two Defendants, The Empanelling Of Two Juries Simul- Taneously Is Permissible. Jan 1974

Criminal Law-Multiple Jury Joint Trials-On The Joint Trial Of Two Defendants, The Empanelling Of Two Juries Simul- Taneously Is Permissible.

Fordham Urban Law Journal

Defendant was indicted on three separate counts in federal court and two juries were empaneled for one of the counts to try defendant and accomplice simultaneously. When testimony probative as to Sidman, but prejudicial to Clifford was about to be admitted through cross-examination, the jury sitting in judgment of Clifford was excused. Both men were convicted and on appeal Sidman's conviction was affirmed and Clifford's reversed. The multiple jury joint trial is a modification of the jury trial concept. The idea, however, desperately needs direction and it was for this reason that the appellate court, while upholding the conviction, did …


Case Notes Jan 1965

Case Notes

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.


Dombrowski V. Pfister: Federal Injunctions Against State Prosecutions In Civil Rights Cases—A New Trend In Federal-State Judicial Relations, Bradley R. Brewer Jan 1965

Dombrowski V. Pfister: Federal Injunctions Against State Prosecutions In Civil Rights Cases—A New Trend In Federal-State Judicial Relations, Bradley R. Brewer

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.