Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 19 of 19

Full-Text Articles in Law

The Restatement Of The Law, Children And The Law: A Blueprint For Reforming The Child Welfare System, Clare Huntington Jan 2022

The Restatement Of The Law, Children And The Law: A Blueprint For Reforming The Child Welfare System, Clare Huntington

Faculty Scholarship

As part of the special issue on the foster care system, this essay challenges the assumption that all the children who are in foster care should be in foster care. The essay first describes the familiar—and still persuasive—argument that foster care does not serve the interests of most children and families. It then brings a new lens to bear on this argument by describing the work of the American Law Institute's Restatement of the Law, Children and the Law, which provides a blueprint for shrinking the child welfare system and promoting child well-being.


Mutual Dependency In Child Welfare, Clare Huntington Jan 2006

Mutual Dependency In Child Welfare, Clare Huntington

Faculty Scholarship

The child welfare system is in need of fundamental reform. To the great detriment of parents and children, in the current system the state waits for a crisis in a family and then intervenes in a heavy-handed fashion. The state pays scant attention to the prevention of child abuse and neglect. This article argues that the principle conceptual barrier to the adoption of a prevention-oriented approach to child welfare is the dominant conception of family autonomy, which venerates freedom from state control. This article proposes a novel reconfiguration of family autonomy that encourages engagement with the state, rather than simply …


Rights Myopia In Child Welfare, Clare Huntington Jan 2005

Rights Myopia In Child Welfare, Clare Huntington

Faculty Scholarship

For decades, legal scholars have debated the proper balance of parents' rights and children's rights in the child welfare system. This Article argues that the debate mistakenly privileges rights. Neither parents' rights nor children's rights serve families well because, as implemented, a solely rights-based model of child welfare does not protect the interests of parents or children. Additionally, even if well-implemented, the model still would not serve parents or children because it obscures the important role of poverty in child abuse and neglect and fosters conflict rather than collaboration between the state and families. In lieu of a solely rights-based …


Recommendations Of The Conference On Achieving Justice: Parents And The Child Welfare System Jan 2001

Recommendations Of The Conference On Achieving Justice: Parents And The Child Welfare System

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.


Report Of The Education Working Group, Naomi Lynch, Virginia Strand Jan 2001

Report Of The Education Working Group, Naomi Lynch, Virginia Strand

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.


Report Of The Funding Working Group, Edith Holzer Jan 2001

Report Of The Funding Working Group, Edith Holzer

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.


Report Of The Judiciary And The Courts Working Group, Nanette Schorr Jan 2001

Report Of The Judiciary And The Courts Working Group, Nanette Schorr

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.


Report Of The Parent Representation Working Group, Beth Harrow, Sue Jacobs Jan 2001

Report Of The Parent Representation Working Group, Beth Harrow, Sue Jacobs

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.


Report Of The Parent Self-Advocacy Working Group, Lyn Slater Jan 2001

Report Of The Parent Self-Advocacy Working Group, Lyn Slater

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.


Report Of The Race, Class, Ethnicity And Gender Working Group, Dana Hamilton Jan 2001

Report Of The Race, Class, Ethnicity And Gender Working Group, Dana Hamilton

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.


Report Of The Case Management Working Group, Mary Ann Forgey, Hank Orenstein Jan 2001

Report Of The Case Management Working Group, Mary Ann Forgey, Hank Orenstein

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.


Parents And The Child Welfare System, Foreword, Ann Moynihan, Mary Ann Forgey, Debra Harris Jan 2001

Parents And The Child Welfare System, Foreword, Ann Moynihan, Mary Ann Forgey, Debra Harris

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.


Report Of The Ethics And Professionalism Working Group, Nanette Schrandt Jan 2001

Report Of The Ethics And Professionalism Working Group, Nanette Schrandt

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.


Achieving Justice, Barriers To Achieving Justice For Incarcerated Parents, Martha L. Raimon Jan 2001

Achieving Justice, Barriers To Achieving Justice For Incarcerated Parents, Martha L. Raimon

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.


Acs's Interpretation Of The "No Contact Rule" Impedes The Reunification Of Families, Nanette Schorr Jan 2001

Acs's Interpretation Of The "No Contact Rule" Impedes The Reunification Of Families, Nanette Schorr

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.


Family Court Case Conferencing And Post-Dispositional Tracking: Tools For Achieving Justice For Parents In The Child Welfare System, Sara P. Schechter Jan 2001

Family Court Case Conferencing And Post-Dispositional Tracking: Tools For Achieving Justice For Parents In The Child Welfare System, Sara P. Schechter

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Criminalization Of Child Welfare In New York City: Sparing The Child Or Spoiling The Family?, Alison B. Vreeland Jan 2000

The Criminalization Of Child Welfare In New York City: Sparing The Child Or Spoiling The Family?, Alison B. Vreeland

Fordham Urban Law Journal

The trend in child welfare has been to err on the side of protection, often considered erring on the side of the child. While this approach may have been appropriate to overcome a long history of State abstinence from involvement in the family domain, it has been under-inclusive in protecting the child's fundamental right to a parent-child relationship. A delicate balance must be struck between family autonomy and State intervention. This balance is best achieved in the family court when the child's best interest is represented and the family is addressed as a whole. Under traditional criminal procedure, which focuses …


The Other "Neglected" Parties In Child Protective Proceedings: Parents In Poverty And The Role Of The Lawyers Who Represent Them, Kathleen A. Bailie Jan 1998

The Other "Neglected" Parties In Child Protective Proceedings: Parents In Poverty And The Role Of The Lawyers Who Represent Them, Kathleen A. Bailie

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.


Kinship Foster Care: A Relatively Permanent Solution, Marla Gottlieb Zwas Jan 1993

Kinship Foster Care: A Relatively Permanent Solution, Marla Gottlieb Zwas

Fordham Urban Law Journal

Kinship foster care is intended to provide substantially the same standard of care as children receive in placement with unrelated foster parents. In practice, however, the two differ enormously in New York City. Frequently, agencies place foster children in the homes of relatives with little regard for the adequacy of those homes. This Note evaluates the existing kinship foster care system, and examines the possibility of addressing the program's problems by creating a new legislative category for kinship guardians.