Law Commons^™

The Myth Of Religious Freedom: The Implications Of State Control Of Religious Expression In The Name Of Public Order, David N. Wagner

David N. Wagner

The state prevents certain religious expression in the name of public order. This article explores the state's role in providing an environment for persons to realize the fullness of their humanity as creatures made in the image and likeness of God.

The Invading Waters: Climate Change Dispossession, State Extinction, And International Law, Jared D. Hestetune

Jared D Hestetune

The level of the sea is inevitably rising. Even the conservative estimates of the IPCC portray a dire future for low-lying island nations such as the Republic of Maldives. The future of an inundated state bodes ill for Maldives's continued participation in international relations. This essay analyzes the possibility of the persistence of a state after its territory has been submerged and destroyed, and it comes to the unfortunate conclusion that a submerged state will de facto become extinct in international law. Thus, entire nationalities will disappear, which likely consequence is strong motivation to protect the human right of national …

Polarized Circuits: Party Affiliation Of Appointing Presidents, Ideology And Circuit Court Voting In Race And Gender Civil Rights Cases, Christopher R. Smith

Christopher R Smith

ABSTRACT Polarized Circuits: Party Affiliation of Appointing Presidents, Ideology and Circuit Court Voting in Race and Gender Civil Rights Cases This article seeks to examine the impact of Presidential party affiliation on the ideological voting patterns of Circuit Court judicial appointments within the context of race and gender civil rights cases. The article assesses two hypotheses regarding Circuit Court judicial voting patterns in race and gender civil rights cases: 1) That the ideological voting gap between Democratic appointed Circuit Court judges and Republican appointed Circuit Court judges has widened over time within the context of race and gender civil rights …

I Fought The Law And The Law Lost: The Case For Congressional Oversight Over Systemic Doj Discovery Abuse In Criminal Cases, Christopher R. Smith

Christopher R Smith

ABSTRACT I Fought the Law and the Law Lost: The Case for Congressional Oversight Over Systemic DOJ Discovery Abuse in Criminal Cases This article addresses the need for congressional oversight over systemic DOJ criminal discovery abuse. The first section of the article outlines a sample group of cases across multiple federal districts, which represent the most highly publicized systemic DOJ criminal discovery abuse cases over the last two years. This first section of the article also examines the statistical record of DOJ’s Office of Professional Responsibility (“OPR”) in terms of investigating federal prosecutorial abuse in criminal matters and enforcement of …

Strategic Pragmatism Or Radical Idealism?: The Same-Sex Marriage And Civil Rights Movements Juxtaposed, Kathryn L. Marshall

Kathryn L Marshall

Within the debate over the most effective strategy for achieving social change, there remains a significant divide between those who argue in favor of pushing for immediate and full equality and those who favor a more incremental approach. Indeed, this debate is looming large over the current struggle to achieve same-sex marriage rights nationwide. In this Article, I suggest that the unique political and social landscape within which the same-sex marriage movement is unfolding has important implications for the way in which the struggle can most effectively proceed. To illuminate the importance of this individualized approach, I compare the same-sex …

The United States Are But One Country: A Short History Of Grammar And Liberty, Charles R. Gardner

Charles Gardner

This legal essay traces the conversion of “the United States” from a plural to a singular noun in United States Supreme Court decisions, in presidential proclamations and inaugural addresses, in diplomatic correspondence and in public discourse. It did not happen with a bang at the end of the Civil War, but with a whimper at the beginning of the twentieth century.

Today, at the beginning of the twenty-first, the singularity of humanity, for which that conflagration was allegedly fought, still eludes us. It is that latter singularity that inspires and organizes this essay.

Not until the digital age was it …

Excuse Me, Sir, Can You Spare Some Certiorari? Why Downtown “No Panhandling” Zones Are Constitutionally Suspect, Noah J. Kores

Noah J Kores

Panhandlers are becoming increasingly prevalent in urban areas across the United States. Many cities have taken action to regulate where, when, and how panhandling may be performed. One particular trend raises many First Amendment questions: downtown panhandling bans. As panhandling is a form of free speech, the question is whether downtown bans go too far.

Under the First Amendment, many downtown bans fail both intermediate and strict scrutiny. Specifically, St. Petersburg, Florida’s ordinance fails because it places content-based restrictions on speech -- meaning it restricts speech based on what an individual is attempting to say. Panhandling bans are content-based because …

From Enemy Combatant To American Citizen: Protecting Our Constitution, Not Our Enemy, Annie Macaleer

Annie Macaleer

This Article advocates maintaining the use of Combatant Status Review Tribunals and military commissions in the framework that the executive and legislative branches have already established during the Bush administration, despite the Obama administration’s recent policy to try detainees in federal court. Furthermore, this Article argues against the use of Article III criminal courts as an arena to prosecute unlawful enemy combatants.

Who Let The Dog Out?: On The British Roots Of American Bounty Hunting, Brian K. Pinaire

Brian K. Pinaire

This Essay provides the first-ever scholarly investigation of the origins of “bounty hunting” as the practice exists in the United States. With an historical focus on British policies instituted around the turn into the eighteenth century, I argue that the scheme of regularized rewards for the arrest and prosecution of alleged criminal offenders constitutes the “roots” of American bounty hunting. This early system, whose practitioners were referred to as “thief-takers,” formalized and legitimized the notion of incentivized pursuit of “fugitives” and—while eventually phased out in Britain—provides the historical and conceptual parallel for the for-profit, private sector-level apprehension of individuals wanted …

The United Kingdom’S Human Rights Act: Using Its Past To Predict Its Future, Joanne Sweeny

JoAnne Sweeny

The results of the recent General Election in the United Kingdom have both highlighted the flexible nature of the UK’s constitution and placed the UK’s existing bill of rights (the Human Rights Act 1998) in jeopardy. In order to predict the HRA’s future, it is useful to consider how and why the HRA was enacted. Through the use of primary data, this article shows that the HRA was enacted as a result of a unique combination of historical factors and the efforts of public interest groups. These two main elements are analyzed using Rational Choice Theory and Social Movement Theory, …

Present At The Creation: The 1910 Big Burn And The Formative Days Of The U.S. Forest Service, Michael Blumm

Michael Blumm

This is a book review of Timothy Egan's "The Big Burn: Teddy Roosevelt and the Fire That Saved America."

Limiting Unlimited Government Through Constitutional Points Of Order, Justin T. Sigman

Justin T Sigman

This article identifies a salient feature of the recent health care debate that has been overlooked by the academy, historians and advocates of federalism: on December 23, 2009, for the first time in its history, the United States Senate directly debated and voted on the meaning of the Tenth Amendment. Equally unprecedented is the manner in which this came about: points of order, including constitutional points of order, had previously been a form of procedural objection to a bill or amendment; allowing a point of order that a bill or amendment violates a substantive provision of the Constitution is analogous …

Marriage And Law Reform: Lessons From The Nineteenth Century Michigan Married Women’S Property Acts, Ellen Dannin

Ellen Dannin

If law reform had the neat trajectory of a bullet from a smoking gun, life and law would be neater – but less interesting. This article began as a simple empirical study to test whether Michigan’s 1844 Married Women’s Property Act affected conveyancing.

When the results showed that it had no effect – that married women were included as grantors even before the MWPA made it legal for them to own property – the study expanded into a quest to identify the processes that led to its enactment and explained its operation on the family, a fundamental social institution. In …

The Supreme Appointment: Visionaries Need Not Apply, Charles W. Rhodes

Charles W Rhodes

The recent announcement of Justice John Paul Stevens that he would retire at the end of the October 2009 Term has instigated the typical media frenzy of shortlists and speculation regarding the identity of the next nominee to the United States Supreme Court. Will President Barack Obama make a bold nomination of a liberal judicial visionary to battle Justices Scalia and Thomas? Will he nominate a political officeholder who will bring a new perspective on the role of the Court? Or will he follow the recent tradition of nominating a sitting federal appellate court judge with a prestigious academic and …

Changing The Rules Of The Game: Deriving New Rules And Practices From Caperton V. A.T. Massey Coal Co., Aman L. Mcleod

Aman L McLeod

In 2009, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co., in which it ruled that judges must recuse themselves in cases involving those who have provided a disproportionate amount of financial support to their campaigns. This decision has forced states to reconsider their campaign finance laws and their judicial recusal rules. This article proposes practical and modest reforms that states could adopt that would effectively respond to the Caperton decision.

Fighting Homogenization: The Global Infiltration Of Technology And The Struggle To Preserve Cultural Distinctiveness., Saptarishi Bandopadhyay

Saptarishi Bandopadhyay

While technology and globalization continue to pervade every aspect of the world, the scope for the sustenance of national or regional culture is rapidly disappearing. This paper will seek to use the lessons and experiences obtained through the controversies in the use of Direct Broadcasting Satellites in its more initial years and apply the same to the Internet to assess its effect on the culture of developing States. The eventual thesis proposed here argues that the freedom of information upheld through technology, and the human right to culture need not be seen as perpendicular interests, but that the latter may …

Economically Bebevolent Dictators: Lessobns For Developing Democracies, Ronald J. Gilson, Curtis J. Milhaupt

Ronald J. Gilson

The post-war experience of developing countries leads to two depressing conclusions: only a small number of countries have successfully developed; and development theory has not produced development. In this article we examine one critical fact that might provide insights into the development conundrum: Some autocratic regimes have fundamentally transformed their economies, despite serious deficiencies along a range of other dimensions. Our aim is to understand how growth came about in these regimes, and whether emerging democracies might learn something important from these experiences. Our thesis is that in these economically successful countries, the authoritarian regime managed a critical juncture in …

History, Strategy And True Believers: Combining Rational Choice Theory And Social Movement Theory To Explain The Effectiveness Of Social Movements, Joanne Sweeny

JoAnne Sweeny

Both Rational Choice Theory and Social Movement Theory attempt to explain how public interest groups can influence political actors to enact progressive legislation or case law. Yet neither of these theories present a clear picture of what must be present for a social movement to succeed nor what must be absent for it to fail. For example, the bill of rights movement in the United Kingdom resulted in the Human Rights Act 1998 while the United States’ gay rights movement, which began to gain momentum around the same time, has had much more inconsistent success. This article addresses this problem …

Harvey Milk, Jane Roe, And James Brady: Why Civic Organizing Matters, Palma Joy Strand

palma joy strand

This Article presents a view of the civic underpinnings of law by examining how civic interaction or the lack of such interaction facilitates or inhibits sociolegal change. The Article begins with empirical observations of civic experience and engagement, which ground more general conclusions about the importance of civic relationships and civic networks as well as the way personal stories contribute to the creation of both. The Article then applies these conclusions to three currently contentious and unsettled issues: gay rights, abortion, and guns. As to gay rights, the “coming out” process identified with Harvey Milk has transformed the civic landscape, …

Indecisive Reasons For Action: Socrates, Not Hercules, As Judicial Ideal, Eric J. Miller

Eric J. Miller

Ronald Dworkin famously introduces the idealized judge, Hercules, to demonstrate how to identify one right answer for any legal problem. Since judicial disagreement makes sense, according to Dworkin, against the background of plural theories of the good, Hercules solves a particular political problem: how to avoid apathy or indecisiveness in choosing among competing theories. Dworkin's judge is supposed to stand by his or her political convictions in the face of competing, plural points of view. Choosing the one right answer is thus a method of political commitment.

My claim is that Dworkin is caught between a rock and a hard …

Forget Privacy: The Warren Court’S Regulatory Revolution In Criminal Procedure, Eric J. Miller

Eric J. Miller

The standard story describing the Warren Court’s criminal procedure “rights revolution,” claims that the Court, motivated by liberal egalitarianism, engaged in a rights-expanding jurisprudence that made it harder for the police to search, seize, and interrogate criminal defendants. Frightened by the popular backlash against high crime rates, a cowed Court in Terry v. Ohio shifted from its rights-expanding to a rights-constricting phase, making it easier for the police to search and seize criminal suspects. Measured by this rights revolution, there were in fact two Warren Courts, a liberal and a more conservative one, emblematically separated by Terry.

The standard story …

Attitudes, Advocacy And Polarization: The New Iron Triangle Of American Public Policy, Roger L. Conner, Patricia Jordan

Roger L Conner

Electoral politics in the U.S. have always been nasty and brutish. Pervasive polarization in public policy disputes is a new an worrisome trend that has attracted considerable attention recently. Using insights gleaned from social psychology, this article finds that “strong", negative "attitudes," once attached to an “attitude object” such as the “other side” in a policy conflict, will operate subconsciously to distort cognition in ways that generate extreme and polarized thinking. Scholars from a different field, public policy studies, find that conversations about public policy increasingly occur inside of “advocacy coalitions,” vast and networks of people and groups that are …

Sunset 2010: The Sunshine State, In Space, Timothy M. Ravich

Timothy M Ravich

In light of the imminent retirement of the Space Shuttle fleet later this year, this article addresses the recent enactment of new laws in Florida and elsewhere, together with the emergence of a space tourism industry and burgeoning cadre of private aerospace entrepreneurs. The significance of this is that space law presents serious private commercial opportunities for all Americans. This article focuses on the particular role Florida has played in national human spaceflight missions and expresses sincere concern about the state’s current and future direction as spacefarers look to different jurisdictions and platforms to support the next phase of space …

False And Misleading Campaign Speech And The Need For Reform, Kirsten L. Wilcox

Kirsten L Wilcox

This article examines the prevalence of false and misleading speech in political campaigns and the role of the media in proliferating this false speech. Four examples of false speech from the 2008 presidential campaign are considered, as well as the effects of that speech. The media contributes to the problem of false speech when it fails to correct false statements and repeats misleading claims. Several solutions are proposed for decreasing the amount of false or misleading speech in campaigns, including better fact checking, public service announcements, coverage restrictions and a ratings system.

Sugarcoating The Eighth Amendment: Gross Disproportionality Review Is Simply The Fourteenth Amendment Rational-Basis Test, Christopher J. Declue

Christopher J DeClue

It is extremely difficult for a defendant to successfully challenge the length of a sentence under the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment. To succeed in such a challenge, a defendant must establish that his sentence is grossly disproportionate to the offense. However, the Court has never offered consistent, workable guidelines to determine whether a sentence is grossly disproportionate.

This Article demonstrates that gross disproportionality review is simply a rational-basis test, one which is virtually identical to the Fourteenth Amendment rational-basis test. Under the Fourteenth Amendment rational-basis test, a law is upheld so long as it furthers a …

Presidential Ambitions Of U.S. Supreme Court Justices:, William G. Ross

William G. Ross

A remarkably large number of U.S. Supreme Court justices have had presidential aspirations while serving on the Court. Several have conducted covert presidential campaigns, and a few nineteenth century justices even campaigned openly from the bench. In at least three quarters of the elections between 1832 and 1956, one or more justices attempted to obtain a presidential or vice presidential nomination or were prominently mentioned as possible candidates. During the past half century, no Supreme Court justice appears to have entertained serious presidential ambitions, probably because no justice who has been appointed during the past fifty years has held any …

Why The Supreme Court Issues Plurality Opinions, David R. Stras, James F. Spriggs

David R Stras

Many of the Supreme Court’s most important decisions, such as those involving executive power and the constitutionality of abortion regulations, are decided by plurality decision. Plurality opinions result when five or more Justices agree on the result in a particular case but no single rationale or opinion garners five votes. Many Justices, including William Rehnquist and Ruth Bader Ginsburg, have addressed the problems created by plurality opinions, such as interpretive difficulties in determining the Court’s holding, but few scholars have addressed plurality decisions other than in passing. In the first empirical analysis examining the occurrence of plurality decisions, the authors …

“I Am A Bit Sickened”: Examining Archetypes Of Congressional War Crimes Oversight After My Lai And Abu Ghraib, Samuel L. Brenner

Samuel L Brenner

Following both the My Lai massacre during the Vietnam conflict and the Abu Ghraib prisoner abuse scandal during the Iraq War, many senators and representatives reacted in certain predictable ways by condemning atrocities and expressing horror or disgust at the evidence they had seen. At the same time, some of those same legislators denied that American forces had been involved with atrocities, attempted to foist blame on the victims or on a “small number” of bad soldiers, or suggested that examining American atrocities would be dangerous for American servicemen and for the United States generally. What is most startling about …

Congress’S Right To Counsel In Intelligence Oversight, Kathleen Clark

Kathleen Clark

This article examines Congress’s ability to consult its lawyers and other expert staff in conducting oversight. For decades, congressional leaders have acquiesced in the executive branch’s insistence that certain intelligence information not be shared with congressional staffers, even those staffers who have high-level security clearances. As a result, Congress has been hobbled in its ability to understand and analyze key executive branch programs. This policy became particularly controversial connection with the Bush administration’s warrantless surveillance program. Senate Intelligence Committee Vice-Chair Jay Rockefeller noted the “profound oversight issues” implicated by the surveillance program and lamented the fact that he felt constrained …

Understanding Vague Signing Statements, Michael J. Mccarthy

Michael J. McCarthy

This paper identifies and assesses vagueness as a reoccurring feature of modern signing statements. It analyzes how vagueness affects a signing statement’s ability to achieve a variety of objectives, from preserving executive prerogatives to shaping how the judiciary construes statutory language. While vagueness consistently decreases a signing statement’s effectiveness, specificity may unintentionally frustrate the signing statement’s purpose. The interplay between the risks of specificity and the inefficiency of vagueness may suggest that the signing statement is not as powerful a presidential tool as is commonly thought.