Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Georgetown University Law Center (40)
- Duke Law (23)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (21)
- Cornell University Law School (15)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (15)
-
- William & Mary Law School (12)
- University of Georgia School of Law (11)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (10)
- Boston University School of Law (9)
- Notre Dame Law School (8)
- University of Michigan Law School (8)
- Brooklyn Law School (7)
- Columbia Law School (7)
- Pace University (6)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (6)
- Roger Williams University (5)
- University of Colorado Law School (5)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (5)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (5)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (4)
- New York Law School (4)
- University of Richmond (4)
- Wayne State University (4)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (4)
- American University Washington College of Law (3)
- Duquesne University (3)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (3)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (3)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (3)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (3)
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Law (30)
- Constitutional law (26)
- Constitution (19)
- Judicial review (17)
- Supreme Court (13)
-
- First Amendment (12)
- Constitutional interpretation (11)
- Executive power (10)
- Democracy (9)
- Separation of powers (9)
- United States Supreme Court (9)
- Originalism (8)
- Religion (8)
- Civil rights (7)
- Constitution – Interpretation and construction (7)
- Courts (7)
- Equal protection (7)
- Federalism (7)
- Law (7)
- Due process (6)
- Jurisprudence (6)
- Politics (6)
- Constitutional theory (5)
- Criminal law (5)
- Eminent domain (5)
- History (5)
- International law (5)
- Privacy (5)
- Sixteenth Amendment (5)
- Taxation (5)
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (53)
- Faculty Publications (39)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (36)
- All Faculty Scholarship (21)
- Scholarly Works (18)
-
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (15)
- Articles (13)
- Journal Articles (12)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (6)
- Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar (5)
- Law Faculty Publications (5)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (5)
- Publications (5)
- Working Paper Series (5)
- Articles & Chapters (4)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (4)
- Law Faculty Research Publications (4)
- Scholarly Articles (4)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (3)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (3)
- Book Chapters (3)
- Ledewitz Papers (3)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (3)
- Faculty Articles and Other Publications (2)
- Faculty Law Review Articles (2)
- Law Faculty Presentations and Testimony (2)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (2)
- Popular Media (2)
- Publications and Research (2)
- Scholarship@WashULaw (2)
Articles 301 - 304 of 304
Full-Text Articles in Law
The "Constitution Restoration Act" And Judicial Independence: Some Observations, Mark V. Tushnet
The "Constitution Restoration Act" And Judicial Independence: Some Observations, Mark V. Tushnet
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
This Essay uses the proposed Constitution Restoration Act of 2005 as the vehicle for exploring some aspects of contemporary concerns about judicial independence and the mechanisms available to control what might be perceived as abuses of judicial authority . . . I doubt that the Act has a serious chance of enactment, but its introduction provides an opportunity to examine some difficulties associated with congressional control of judicial decision-making. I begin by treating the Constitution Restoration Act as a real statute, asking what its substantive terms mean. I argue that there is substantial tension between what the Act says and …
Constitutional Culture Or Ordinary Politics: A Reply To Reva Siegel, Robin West
Constitutional Culture Or Ordinary Politics: A Reply To Reva Siegel, Robin West
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Reva Siegel's lecture, ‘Constitutional Culture, Social Movement Conflict and Constitutional Change: The Case of the de Facto ERA,’ explores the interaction between the courts and social movements in creating constitutional meaning. In the primary part of this response I focus my comments on Siegel's three major contributions: First, the historical explanation of the source of the Court's authority in the development of the so-called de facto ERA; second, the articulation of a general, jurisprudential thesis regarding social contestation as a source of constitutional authority apart from text, history, and principle; and third, the quasi-sociological descriptive account of the form social …
Who's Afraid Of Unenumerated Rights?, Randy E. Barnett
Who's Afraid Of Unenumerated Rights?, Randy E. Barnett
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Unenumerated rights are expressly protected against federal infringement by the original meaning of the Ninth Amendment and against state infringement by the original meaning of the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Despite this textual recognition, unenumerated rights have received inconsistent and hesitant protection ever since these provisions were enacted, and what protection they do receive is subject to intense criticism. In this essay, the author examines why some are afraid to enforce unenumerated rights. While this reluctance seems most obviously to stem from the uncertainty of ascertaining the content of unenumerated rights, he contends that underlying this …
Cuno: The Property Tax Issue, Edward A. Zelinsky
Cuno: The Property Tax Issue, Edward A. Zelinsky
Articles
The author criticizes the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Cuno v. DaimlerChrysler Inc., in which the court ruled that Ohio's investment tax credit violated the U.S. Constitution's Commerce Clause. Zelinsky says the dormant Commerce Clause concept of nondiscrimination is overbroad and undefinable and should be abandoned. He hopes this decision will give the U.S. Supreme Court an opportunity to reassess the concept.