Law Commons^™

Branch Banking: The Oklahoma Debate, Robert J. Bartz

Tulsa Law Review

No abstract provided.

Issues In School Labor Relations, Marvin J. Glink

Chicago-Kent Law Review

No abstract provided.

Motor Vehicle Liability Self-Insurance: The Coverage Gap, Robert Allan Naeve

Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review

No abstract provided.

Recent Changes In California And Federal Usury Laws: New Opportunities For Real Estate And Commercial Loans, Laurence G. Preble, Thomas K. Herskowitz

Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review

No abstract provided.

Application Of Noerr-Pennington And The First Amendment To Politically Motivated Economic Boycotts: Missouri V. Now, Charles P. Cockerill

Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Right To Choose An Unproven Method Of Treatment, V. Anthony Unan

Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Lawyer’S Moral Paradox, Thomas W. Giegerich

Duke Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Spreading Of Interest Under The Actuarial Method., Frank A. St. Claire

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

The Revised Article 5069-1.07(B)., Harry M. Roberts Jr.

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Dedication To Dean Read

Tulsa Law Review

No abstract provided.

Jones V. Wolf: Neutral Principles Standard Of Review For Intra-Church Disputes, Robert Byron Hubbell

Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Limits Of The Lawyer’S Discretion And The Law Of Legal Ethics: National Student Marketing Revisited, L. Ray Patterson

Duke Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Ethics Of Moving To Disqualify Opposing Counsel For Conflict Of Interest, Lawrence Crocker

Duke Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Judicial Competence And Fundamental Rights, Earl S. Maltz, Ira C. Lupu

Michigan Law Review

In the April 1979 issue of the Michigan Law Review, Professor Ira Lupu added his valuable contribution to the continuing debate on the problem of defining the nature of fundamental rights under the Constitution. In many respects his article is a wholly admirable piece of scholarship, both well-researched and carefully reasoned. However, on one issue - the question of judicial competence to identify the values he defines as fundamental - Professor Lupu's discussion is seriously deficient. This letter will examine the problem of judicial competence and conclude that it is fatal to Professor Lupu's conception of the appropriate role …

Relaxation Of Implementation Plans Under The 1977 Clean Air Act Amendments, David P. Currie

Michigan Law Review

This Article probes the convoluted ameliorative provisions of the 1977 Amendments in three parts. Section I deals with delayed compliance orders - orders granted to stationary sources unable to meet the statutory deadlines for compliance. Section 113( d) is the fountainhead provision, and besides a general provision for delayed compliance, it also contains specific provisions for sources unable to comply due to retirement of present facilities, due to investment in innovative facilities with the promise of greater pollution reduction in the future or due to government orders to convert from cleaner fuels to coal.

Section II analyzes two specific relief …

Survival Of Rights Of Action After Corporate Merger, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

Once a corporation ceases to exist, most courts permit neither primary nor derivative suits to be brought in its name. If a merger precipitates that corporate demise, courts usually hold that standing to sue, like other assets of the "merged" corporation, passes to the surviving corporation. This Note ponders the merit of that rule of passage.

Section I categorizes the cases defining the rule of passage. Some courts have steadfastly adhered to the rule and denied standing to the merged corporation's shareholders. Other courts, fearing that the rule would preclude meritorious actions, have created exceptions allowing these shareholders to sue …

Legal Representation Of The Mentally Ill, James R. Elkins

West Virginia Law Review

The "rights revolution," sparked by the United States Supreme Court under the leadership of former Chief Justice Earl Warren, has abated as the Court modifies and in some instances emasculates the constitutional rights afforded criminal defendants. While the Supreme Court assumes a more “moderate" position regarding the rights of criminal defendants and takes a closer look at due process decisions generally, the "rights revolution" has had substantial spillover effect in the case of individuals confined involuntarily in mental institutions. The courts, especially federal courts, have recognized the constitutional basis of procedural and substantive safeguards for individuals subject to commitment in …

Spouse's Fraud As A Bar To Insurance Recovery, Stephen P. Carney

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.

Rachel Armelinda Cintron V. Elma J. Milkovich : Respondent's Brief, Utah Supreme Court

Utah Supreme Court Briefs (1965 –)

Appeal from Third Judicial District Court of Salt Lake County, The Honorable Ernest F. Baldwin, Jr. , Judge

Michael W. Mcbride V. Terry Lynne Jones (Formerly Known As Terry Lynne Mcbride) : Appellant's Brief, Utah Supreme Court

Utah Supreme Court Briefs (1965 –)

Appeal from the Third Judicial District Court of Salt Lake County, Utah The Honorable Christine M. Durham, Judge

Michael W. Strand V. Jack Cranney Et Al : Reply Brief Of Appellant, Utah Supreme Court

Utah Supreme Court Briefs (1965 –)

Appeal from a Judgment of the Third Judicial District Court in and for Salt Lake County, State of Utah, the Honorable G. Hal Taylor, Judge presiding.

Andrea Martinez Et Al V. Bona Vista Water Improvement District : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Supreme Court

Utah Supreme Court Briefs (1965 –)

Appeal from the Decision of the Second Judicial District Court for Weber County, Utah. The Honorable Calvin Gould, Judge.

Maxine K. Blackburn V. Terrell M. Blackburn : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Supreme Court

Utah Supreme Court Briefs (1965 –)

Appeal from the Judgment of the Third District Court In and For Salt Lake County Honorable Dean E. Conder, Judge

Woolsack 1979 Volume 20 Number 6, University Of San Diego School Of Law Student Bar Association

Newspaper, The Woolsack (1963-1987)

Table of Contents:

Counseling for new Counselors Law students can overcome their fears by Janice Belluci

San Onofre: Where does the fault lie? Speaker points out danger by Todd Spangler

From the Editor

From the readers

Viewpoints

Briefly

The school on the hill by Al Schack

A tribute to a great Prof

Presents for a new year by Amy Wrobel

Record reviews: the knack

Sex and the law student by Scott Kolod

The press is in a mess Bernstein speaks at U.S.D by Dan Trigoboff

Levitt Winners

Kerig Honored at Football Banquet by Scott Kolod

Pacers, Fat Cats Sweep Softball …

Interstate Excavating, Inc V. Agla Development Corporation : Respondent's Brief, Utah Supreme Court

Utah Supreme Court Briefs (1965 –)

Appeal from Default Judgment of the Third District Court of Salt Lake County The Honorable Jay E. Banks, Presiding

Utah Mortgage Loan Corporation V. Betty J. Black, Individually And As Personal Representative Of The Estate Of Don J. Black, And Don J. Black Realty, Inc : Brief Of Amicus Curiae, Utah Supreme Court

Utah Supreme Court Briefs (1965 –)

Appeal from a Summary Judgment of the Third Judicial District Court in and for Salt Lake County, Utah Honorable Christine M. Durham, Judge

City Of Payson V. Richard C. Provstgaard : Respondent's Brief, Utah Supreme Court

Utah Supreme Court Briefs (1965 –)

Appeal from Judgment of the Fourth District Court Utah County, State of Utah The Honorable J. Robert Bullock, Judge

Beverly Kay Christensen V. Alfred Brent Christensen : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Supreme Court

Utah Supreme Court Briefs (1965 –)

Appeal from the Judgment of the Third District Court in and for Salt Lake County Honorable Ernest M. Baldwin, Jr., Judge

The Landmarks Of Federal Hill: Description Of The Duties And Activities Of The Italian Vice Consulate Office Of Ri, Joseph R. Muratore

Joseph Muratore papers: Newspaper Columns

No abstract provided.

Pepperidge Farm, Inc. V. The Board Of Review, Department Of Employment Security, Industrial Commission Of Utah, John I. Johnson And Austin C. Molisa : Brief Of Defendant, Utah Supreme Court

Utah Supreme Court Briefs (1965 –)

Original Action To Review The Proceedings and Order of the Board of Review, Department of Employment Security, Industrial Commission of Utah