Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Supreme Court of the United States (22)
- Jurisprudence (7)
- Administrative Law (5)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (5)
- Constitutional Law (5)
-
- Courts (5)
- First Amendment (4)
- Legislation (4)
- State and Local Government Law (4)
- Election Law (3)
- Immigration Law (3)
- Judges (3)
- Jurisdiction (3)
- Law and Society (3)
- Intellectual Property Law (2)
- Internet Law (2)
- Legal History (2)
- Religion Law (2)
- Sexuality and the Law (2)
- Communications Law (1)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Criminal Procedure (1)
- Disability Law (1)
- Food and Drug Law (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Health Law and Policy (1)
- Human Rights Law (1)
- International Law (1)
- Institution
Articles 31 - 31 of 31
Full-Text Articles in Law
Change, Creation, And Unpredictability In Statutory Interpretation: Interpretive Canon Use In The Roberts Court's First Decade, Nina A. Mendelson
Change, Creation, And Unpredictability In Statutory Interpretation: Interpretive Canon Use In The Roberts Court's First Decade, Nina A. Mendelson
Michigan Law Review
In resolving questions of statutory meaning, the lion’s share of Roberts Court opinions considers and applies at least one interpretive canon, whether the rule against surplusage or the presumption against state law preemption. This is part of a decades-long turn toward textualist statutory interpretation in the Supreme Court. Commentators have debated how to justify canons, since they are judicially created rules that reside outside the statutory text. Earlier studies have cast substantial doubt on whether these canons can be justified as capturing congressional practices or preferences; commentators have accordingly turned toward second-order justifications, arguing that canons usefully make interpretation constrained …