Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Antitrust (8)
- Supreme Court (7)
- Athletics (6)
- Intellectual property (6)
- Sports (6)
-
- Conspiracy (4)
- Copperweld (4)
- Copyright (4)
- Entertainment Law (4)
- Professional sports (4)
- Title IX (4)
- Baseball (3)
- Cable Act (3)
- Cable Television (3)
- Cable television (3)
- Fair use (3)
- Firm (3)
- Government Regulation (3)
- Intellectual Property (3)
- Intellectual Property Law (3)
- Internet (3)
- Licensing (3)
- Media (3)
- Single Entity (3)
- Sports law (3)
- U.S. Congress (3)
- Antitrust law (2)
- Baltimore Orioles (2)
- Baseball history (2)
- Broadcasting (2)
Articles 61 - 62 of 62
Full-Text Articles in Law
Not At The Behest Of Nonlabor Groups: A Revised Prognosis For A Maturing Sports Industry, Phillip J. Closius
Not At The Behest Of Nonlabor Groups: A Revised Prognosis For A Maturing Sports Industry, Phillip J. Closius
All Faculty Scholarship
For most of its history, professional athletics was governed by the unilateral decisions of team owners acting in a league format. In the last twelve years, however, a variety of sporting groups, through access to the judicial system and a changed perception of the legal status of sports, have forced the owners to share the power and wealth derived from the games. Players, unions, agents and rival leagues all now participate, in some form, in the decisions which will shape the future of sports. In the course of this growth, the sports industry has matured into a national business possessed …
The First Amendment And The Cable Television Operator: An Unprotective Shield Against Public Access Requirements, Michael I. Meyerson
The First Amendment And The Cable Television Operator: An Unprotective Shield Against Public Access Requirements, Michael I. Meyerson
All Faculty Scholarship
This article focuses on the question of whether state-imposed public access requirements violate the First Amendment rights of the cable television operator. The author suggests that the appropriate analysis asks whether the law abridges expression the First Amendment was meant to protect. In other words, do cable access requirements abridge speech safeguarded by the First Amendment? The article demonstrates that such requirements do not hinder, but in fact further, fundamental First Amendment interests. Finally, the article shows that access requirements fulfill the standards of the constitutional tests for each classification into which they could be placed.