Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Civil Procedure (16)
- Legislation (15)
- Supreme Court of the United States (13)
- Legal History (12)
- Legal Biography (10)
-
- Courts (7)
- Litigation (5)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (4)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (3)
- Administrative Law (2)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (2)
- Business Organizations Law (2)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (2)
- Criminal Law (2)
- Energy and Utilities Law (2)
- Health Law and Policy (2)
- Insurance Law (2)
- Juvenile Law (2)
- Labor and Employment Law (2)
- Law and Gender (2)
- Law and Race (2)
- Law and Society (2)
- Legal Remedies (2)
- President/Executive Department (2)
- State and Local Government Law (2)
- Common Law (1)
- Communications Law (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Disaster Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Law reform (23)
- United States Supreme Court (13)
- Class actions (11)
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (11)
- Civil Rules Committee (10)
-
- History (10)
- Rule 23 (8)
- Cooper (Edward) (7)
- Rulemaking (7)
- Arbitration (4)
- Congress (4)
- Punishment (4)
- AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion (3)
- Competition (3)
- Employees (3)
- Employment discrimination (3)
- Federal Arbitration Act (3)
- Incentives (3)
- Markets (3)
- Access to the courts (2)
- Amchem Products Inc. v. Windsor (2)
- Authority (2)
- Bias (2)
- Class arbitration (2)
- Crimes (2)
- Decision making (2)
- Executive branch (2)
- Fairness (2)
- Federal agencies (2)
- Judicial interpretation (2)
Articles 31 - 39 of 39
Full-Text Articles in Law
Past The Pillars Of Hercules: Francis Bacon And The Science Of Rulemaking, Daniel R. Coquillette
Past The Pillars Of Hercules: Francis Bacon And The Science Of Rulemaking, Daniel R. Coquillette
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
The parallels between Bacon's career and that of Edward H. Cooper are, of course, obvious. Bacon was one of the great legal minds of his day. Unlike the common-law judges who formed the law by deciding cases, Bacon expressed his greatness in writing brilliant juristic treatises and, as Lord Chancellor, drafting one of the first modern rule systems, the Ordinances in Chancery (1617-1620). Indeed, my thesis is that Bacon invented modern, scientific rulemaking by fusing his new theories of inductive, empirical research with the traditions of equitable pleading and is, in fact, the intellectual forbearer of the likes of Charles …
Professor Ed Cooper: Zen Minimalist, Linda S. Mullenix
Professor Ed Cooper: Zen Minimalist, Linda S. Mullenix
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
In celebration of his twentieth year as the Reporter for the Advisory Committee on Civil Rules, I write to contribute some modest reflections on Professor Cooper's tenure as Advisory Committee Reporter. My comments are those of an academic who had the opportunity to observe the Advisory Committee for nearly a decade, but they are largely the comments of an outsider. Readers might be disappointed to find that there is no dish or inside baseball here.
Franchise Goodwill: Take A Sad Song And Make It Better, Robert W. Emerson
Franchise Goodwill: Take A Sad Song And Make It Better, Robert W. Emerson
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
The end of a franchisor-franchisee relationship is often like a divorce, with the parties engaged in a heated battle over the ownership of the franchise goodwill. In this debate, the same franchisors or franchisees often change their positions on goodwill ownership depending on current needs. This Article analyzes cases in many areas of franchise law to determine why franchisors and franchisees engage in such inconsistent reasoning, what the consequences are for franchising, and if there are ways to produce a more logical and efficient form of analysis and debate. In addressing the most contentious issues of franchising, adherence by litigants …
Protecting The Right Of Citizens To Aggregate Small Claims Against Businesses, Paul D. Carrington
Protecting The Right Of Citizens To Aggregate Small Claims Against Businesses, Paul D. Carrington
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Two years ago I ranted against the Supreme Court's subversion of the Rules Enabling Act and its opposition to the benign aims of the twentieth-century progressive law reformers expressed summarily in Rule 1 of our Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. I observed then that the majority of the Justices of the Supreme Court appeared to have joined the Chamber of Commerce, aligning themselves also with Vice President Dan Quayle's 1989 Council on Competitiveness that denounced effective civil procedure as an enemy of economic development. I was then commenting adversely on what the Court had done to transform Rule 8. I …
Edward Cooper As Curator Of The Civil Rules, Goeffrey C. Hazard Jr.
Edward Cooper As Curator Of The Civil Rules, Goeffrey C. Hazard Jr.
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Ed Cooper has had a salient role in maintaining the Rules Committee process as a highly competent and stable element of lawmaking in this country. He is a consummate master of civil procedure and acutely understands the constitutional and political milieu in which the Rules process functions. Along with other similarly competent and observant Reporters, including the senior serving Reporter, Dan Coquillette, he has helped keep the Rules process and product as evenhanded as can be expected in our complicated legal system.
Shoes That Did Not Drop, Richard Marcus
Shoes That Did Not Drop, Richard Marcus
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
I take "Shoes That Did Not Drop"' as my topic because I appreciate, by now, that what the Advisory Committee on Civil Rules does not do is, in some ways, as important as what it does. Similarly, the decision not to do something is equally important as, and may be more difficult than, the decision to do something. It may sometimes seem that amending the Rules is too easy. Greg Joseph once said that they are amended as often as the telephone book. Some even think that it was a mistake to create a Rules Committee.3 These reactions are overstated, …
The Twelve-Person Federal Civil Jury In Exile, Thomas D. Rowe Jr.
The Twelve-Person Federal Civil Jury In Exile, Thomas D. Rowe Jr.
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
In the mid-1990s, the Advisory Committee on Civil Rules, with Fifth Circuit Judge Patrick Higginbotham as Chair and our honoree, Professor Ed Cooper, in the early years of his long service as Reporter, unanimously (coincidentally, by a 12-0 vote) proposed an amendment to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 48 that would have required the seating of twelve-member juries in federal civil trials. The requirement of a unanimous verdict, unless waived by the parties, and the abolition of alternate jurors would have been unaffected; attrition could reduce a jury's size below twelve members, with a floor of six unless the parties …
What Ed Cooper Has Taught Me About The Realities And Complexities Of Appellate Jurisdiction And Procedure, Catherine T. Struve
What Ed Cooper Has Taught Me About The Realities And Complexities Of Appellate Jurisdiction And Procedure, Catherine T. Struve
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
In this brief essay, I will describe some of what I have learned from Ed Cooper as a fellow participant in the rulemaking process and as a coauthor of two volumes of his Federal Practice and Procedure treatise. To describe everything that Ed has taught me would require much more than the length of this essay. So instead, I will try to offer some representative examples-or, as Ed might say, some "sketches." Because others will discuss Ed's expert guidance of the Rules Committees' consideration of key issues concerning the Civil Rules, my discussion of Ed's scholarship and reporting work will …
A Victimless Sex Crime: The Case For Decriminalizing Consensual Teen Sexting, Joanna R. Lampe
A Victimless Sex Crime: The Case For Decriminalizing Consensual Teen Sexting, Joanna R. Lampe
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
As teenagers' access to cellular phones and the internet has increased over the past two decades, so has their ability to harm themselves and others through misuse of new technology. One risky behavior that has become common among teenagers is "sexting"--the digital sharing of sexually suggestive images. To combat the dangers of teen sexting, many states have criminalized the act. Criminalization does not resolve the issue of teen sexting, however, and in many cases it may cause additional harm. This Note reviews existing state laws related to teen sexting, and critiques these laws on constitutional and policy grounds. It then …