Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Common law (1)
- Disclosure (1)
- Due Process Clause (1)
- Equal Protection Clause (1)
- Fifth Amendment (1)
-
- Hooe v. United States (1)
- Insider trading (1)
- Investors (1)
- Markets (1)
- Misappropriation (1)
- Powell (Lewis F.) (1)
- Principle-agent relation (1)
- Public Use (1)
- Regulatory taking (1)
- SEC (1)
- SEC v. Dirks (1)
- Securities and Exchange Commission (1)
- Securities fraud (1)
- Shareholders (1)
- Stocks (1)
- Takings Clause (1)
- Transaction costs (1)
- Ultra Vires (1)
- United States Supreme Court (1)
- United States v. Carpenter (1)
- United States v. Chiarella (1)
- United States v. O'Hagan (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Ultra Vires Takings, Matthew D. Zinn
Ultra Vires Takings, Matthew D. Zinn
Michigan Law Review
When does legislative or administrative regulatory action "go[] too far" and effectively amount to an .appropriation of private property for which the Fifth Amendment requires just compensation? This question has turned out to be one of the thorniest in American constitutional law. The Supreme Court has identified several circumstances in which one can expect to find a regulatory taking, but its numerous pronouncements on the subject give no clear rule to distinguish compensable takings from noncompensable interference with property rights. Notwithstanding its volume, the commentary on the Takings Clause by and large addresses only proper governmental action that rises to …
United States V. O'Hagan: Agency Law And Justice Powell's Legacy For The Law Of Insider Trading, Adam C. Pritchard
United States V. O'Hagan: Agency Law And Justice Powell's Legacy For The Law Of Insider Trading, Adam C. Pritchard
Articles
The law of insider trading is judicially created; no statutory provision explicitly prohibits trading on the basis of material, non-public information. The Supreme Court's insider trading jurisprudence was forged, in large part, by Justice Lewis F. Powell, Jr. His opinions for the Court in United States v. Chiarella and SEC v. Dirks were, until recently, the Supreme Court's only pronouncements on the law of insider trading. Those decisions established the elements of the classical theory of insider trading under § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"). Under this theory, corporate insiders and their tippees who …