Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Human Rights Law (5)
- Law and Gender (4)
- Family Law (3)
- Sexuality and the Law (3)
- Civil Law (2)
-
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (2)
- International Law (2)
- Law and Society (2)
- Legal Studies (2)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (2)
- Sociology (2)
- Contracts (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Criminology (1)
- Criminology and Criminal Justice (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Health Law and Policy (1)
- Inequality and Stratification (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Labor and Employment Law (1)
- Legal Theory (1)
- Military, War, and Peace (1)
- Science and Technology Law (1)
- Social Control, Law, Crime, and Deviance (1)
- Publication
-
- helen m alvare (4)
- Elizabeth R Ribet (3)
- Ann E. Tweedy (2)
- Aviva A. Orenstein (2)
- Ethan G. Kate (2)
-
- Hezi Margalit (2)
- Jennifer S. Hendricks (2)
- Justin S Murray (2)
- Peter Nicolas (2)
- Ana Filipa Vrdoljak (1)
- Ana M Nacvalovaite (1)
- Andrew J King-Ries (1)
- Athena M Nguyen (1)
- Beth A. Burkstrand-Reid (1)
- Christie J. Edwards Esq. (1)
- Christopher R Smith (1)
- David M. Smolin (1)
- Deborah M. Weiss (1)
- Ellen Dannin (1)
- Erica R Franklin (1)
- Gillian Lester (1)
- Guy Kochlani (1)
- Harry G. Hutchison (1)
- Heron Greenesmith (1)
- Jacqueline D Lipton (1)
- Jeffrey L Gower (1)
- Jeffrey R Baker (1)
- Kendra H Fershee (1)
- Kevin Noble Maillard (1)
- Kimberly Yuracko (1)
Articles 61 - 62 of 62
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Antidiscrimination Paradox: Why Sex Before Race?, Kimberly A. Yuracko
The Antidiscrimination Paradox: Why Sex Before Race?, Kimberly A. Yuracko
Kimberly Yuracko
This paper seeks to explain a paradox: Why does Title VII’s prohibition on sex discrimination currently look so much more expansive than its prohibition on race discrimination? Why in particular, do workers appear to be receiving greater protection for expressions of gender identity than for expressions of racial identity? I argue that as a doctrinal matter, the paradox is illusory—the product of a fundamental misinterpretation of recent sex discrimination case law by scholars. Rather than reflecting fundamentally distinct antidiscrimination principles, the race and sex cases in fact reflect the same traditional commitments to ending status discrimination and undermining group-based subordination. …
Contingent Equal Protection: Reaching For Equality After Ricci And Pics, Jennifer S. Hendricks
Contingent Equal Protection: Reaching For Equality After Ricci And Pics, Jennifer S. Hendricks
Jennifer S. Hendricks
The Supreme Court’s decision in Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District #1 has been extensively analyzed as the latest step in the Court’s long struggle with the desegregation of public schools. This Article examines the decision’s implications for the full range of equal protection doctrine dealing with benign or remedial race and sex classifications. Parents Involved revealed a sharp division on the Court over whether government may consciously try to promote substantive equality. In the past, such efforts have been subject to an equal protection analysis that allows race-conscious or sex-conscious state action, contingent on existing, de …