Law Commons^™

The Information Era Threatens Privacy: A Comparative Study Of Electronic Money’S Privacy Policies And Privacy Laws, Guanru Liu

GUANRU LIU

This thesis consists of an analysis of electronic money (e-money), e-money’s privacy policies and relevant privacy laws. The value of information and the development of technology enhance the risk of privacy violations in the information era. Consumer privacy interests with respect to e-money are governed in part by the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) in Canada and by the European Union’s Data Protection Directive. The analysis is directed at whether the privacy policies of three kinds of e-money – Octopus Card, PayPal and MasterCard – comply with the spirit and letter of these laws. In light of …

Missouri's Innocent Citizens: An Examination Of Missouri's Response To Domestic Violence Incidents Against Children And Teens, Keith P. Freie

Keith P Freie

In 2010 the Missouri Attorney’s General’s Office created a Domestic Violence Task Force for the purpose of analyzing Missouri’s Domestic Violence laws. In 2011, the Missouri General Assembly enacted Senate Bill 320 which included several changes to Missouri’s domestic violence laws stemming from several recommendations from the Attorney General’s Task Force. While Missouri’s 2011 domestic violence law is a comprehensive solution to the many unaddressed needs of child and teen domestic violence victims, additional solutions need to be considered to fully address the problem. Those solutions may include creating special domestic violence and child abuse courts and creating educational programs …

Blatant Bribery Or Locally Lawful?: Is The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act’S “Local Laws” Defense Extinct?, Erik J. King

Erik J King

Under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), it is an affirmative defense if the payments in question were lawful under the written laws of a foreign country. This defense has been largely overlooked by commentators and used sparingly in the court system. This Note examines the utility of this defense, and finds that although the concept underlying the defense remains somewhat alive in certain types of foreign laws that could conceivably excuse a foreign investor, the defense has lost all practical value. U.S. judicial interpretations, multilateral efforts against similar exceptions in other anti-bribery laws, and the subsuming effect of other …

Historical Development Of Brazilian And European Legislation On Beef And Their Relation In The International Trade, Luis Augusto Nero Dr.

Luis Augusto Nero Dr.

Since the beginning of the XX century, Brazil has developed the industrial exploitation of cattle slaughtering to satisfy both internal market and exportation, mainly to European countries and USA. The laws of importing countries on cattle health and beef safety have always been a benchmark for Brazilian ones, since the very beginning of beef industry, until the promulgation of WTO-SPS agreement. The aim of this article is to compare the historical development of Brazilian and European food laws concerning beef, and to establish associations between law-making and Brazilian beef production and exportation

What Should Guide Determinations Of Foreign Official Immunity In Us Courts After Samantar?, Chris C. Morley

Chris C Morley

In the recent Samantar decision, the Supreme Court held that individual foreign officials were not covered by the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act but might still be covered by common law immunity. This article analyzes the extent of that common law immunity and discusses whether more recent developments in domestic and international human rights law should impact the availability of immunity for officials accused of torture, extra-judicial killings, and other violations of the law of nations.

Although the bulk of authority from US and foreign courts suggests that foreign officials should enjoy immunity for acts committed within the scope of their …

The Toll Road Not Taken: Could The One Option Less Used Make A Difference?, Carlos C. Sun

Carlos C Sun

There is a growing transportation financing crisis in the United States caused by a rapidly aging transportation infrastructure, a growing demand for transportation, soaring infrastructure costs and a lack of systematic planning to account for these multiple trends. Potholes, deteriorating bridges and cracked pavements are everywhere, regardless of geographical location, climate or population density. Such infrastructure deterioration negatively impacts the environment via pollution, wasted fuel and inefficient travel patterns. Courts in states such as California have responded pragmatically to the crisis by opening the door to road tolling in various forms. This shift in states’ attitudes toward toll roads comes …

Applying Anti-Money Laundering/Anti-Terrorist Financing Controls To The United States Legal Profession: A Response To The Senate Permanent Subcommittee Report On The Proceeds Of Foreign Corruption, Nicholas S. Kazmerski

Nicholas S. Kazmerski

"Applying Anti-Money Laundering/Anti-Terrorist Financing Controls to the United States Legal Profession: A Response to the Senate Permanent Subcommittee Report on the Proceeds of Foreign Corruption" ***Abstract:This paper examines and comments on the reforms to the U.S. legal profession as proposed by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee Report on the Proceeds of Foreign Corruption (issued February 2010), specifically whether these proposed reforms are realistic or necessary given the existing attorney regulatory framework. To do so, it will first be necessary to provide a general overview of money laundering/terrorist financing followed by a background of anti-money laundering regulation starting with the Bank Secrecy …

Codifying Bankruptcy Law's Fastpass: New Value And The Absolute Priority Rule, David P. Hamm Jr

David P Hamm Jr

The notion behind the absolute priority rule is not novel to any of us. We all learned at a very young age that if someone is in front of you in line—they get served first. This basic notion of fairness affects our lives in several everyday contexts—including bankruptcy. The people in the “bankruptcy” line are the holders of interests in the debtor. If the interest held by party A is “senior” to that of party B, then party A is in front of party B in line. The absolute priority rule essentially provides that the party A must be paid …

U.S. Trade Policy: Increased Emphasis On Worker Rights, Marisa Anne Pagnattaro

marisa pagnattaro

This paper analyzes the increasing focus on worker rights, including the attempt to balance the interests of domestic and international workers, in U.S. trade policy. Part I reviews selected actions asserted by labor unions over the decade prior to the Obama administration, with particular emphasis on the Bush Administration steel tariffs. Part II analyzes two actions taken in 2009, one halting the NAFTA plan to allow trucks from Mexico into the United States. and a second that placed tariffs on tires imported from China. Part III considers the current CAFTA-DR request for consultations with Guatemala for labor rights violations. Part …

The Creation And Destruction Of Price Cartels: An Evolutionary Theory, William Bradford

william bradford

This Article sketches the goals of antitrust law, describes the causes and effects of anticompetitive pricing generally and supracompetitive pricing specifically, explains the inability of antitrust law to suppress some instances of supracompetitive pricing, establishes the importance of trust between firms as a necessary condition for supracompetitive pricing, and illustrates how the strategic exchange of information is crucial to the creation and destruction of trust and thus to the evolution and devolution of price cartels. Part II develops a positive theory that explains and predicts the evolution and devolution of price cartels as a function of the ability of rival …

Chevron As A Doctrine Of Hard Cases, Frederick Liu

Frederick Liu

The conventional wisdom holds that the Chevron doctrine rests on a presumption about congressional intent—a presumption that when a statute is ambiguous, Congress intended the gap to be filled by the agency charged with administering the statute. But the presumption is a mere fiction; Congress generally has no view on whether ambiguities in a statute should be resolved by the agency or the court. This Article proposes a new theory of Chevron, one that rests on a simple reality: No matter how determinate the law may seem, there will inevitably be hard cases—cases in which the law runs out before …

When Mistakes Matter: Election Error And The Dynamic Assessment Of Materiality, Justin Levitt

Justin Levitt

The ghosts of the 2000 presidential election will return in 2012. Photo-finish, and error-laden, elections recur in each cycle. When the margin of error exceeds the margin of victory, officials and courts must decide which, if any, errors to discount or excuse, knowing that the answer will likely determine the election’s winner. Yet in the past eleven years, despite widespread agreement on the likelihood of another meltdown, neither courts nor scholars have developed consistent principles for resolving the errors that cause the chaos.

This Article advances such a principle. It argues that the resolution of an election error should turn …

When Mistakes Matter: Election Error And The Dynamic Assessment Of Materiality, Justin Levitt

Justin Levitt

The ghosts of the 2000 presidential election will return in 2012. Photo-finish, and error-laden, elections recur in each cycle. When the margin of error exceeds the margin of victory, officials and courts must decide which, if any, errors to discount or excuse, knowing that the answer will likely determine the election’s winner. Yet in the past eleven years, despite widespread agreement on the likelihood of another meltdown, neither courts nor scholars have developed consistent principles for resolving the errors that cause the chaos.

This Article advances such a principle. It argues that the resolution of an election error should turn …

Gray Matters: Autism, Impairment, And The End Of Binaries, Kevin M. Barry

Kevin M Barry

First diagnosed by psychiatrist Leo Kanner in 1943, Autism has exploded into the public consciousness in recent years. From science to science fiction, academia to popular culture, Autism has captured the world’s attention and imagination. Autism has also ignited a fierce debate among stakeholders who seek to define its essence. Many parents of Autistic children regard Autism as a scourge and press for a cure. The Neurodiversity Movement, comprised mostly of Autistic adults, regards Autism as a different way of being worthy of respect and even celebration. The Autism war is well underway and, given Autism’s swelling ranks and proposed …

Delegating Supremacy?, David S. Rubenstein

David S Rubenstein

The Court has held that federal agencies may preempt state law in much the same way as Congress. While the Supremacy Clause clearly empowers Congress to displace state law, administrative preemption rests on the undertheorized assumption that Congress may “delegate supremacy” to agencies. This Article challenges the constitutionality of that premise and imagines an unfolding system where agencies are stripped of the power to create supreme federal law. My proposal will no doubt be controversial because of the significant implications it holds for federalism and the operation of modern government. Some of the more serious implications include the substantive displacement …

Is Competition The Solution Or The Problem? An Analysis Of U.S. Mortgage Securitization, Michael N. Simkovic

Michael N Simkovic

This article’s original contribution to the literature about the causes of the U.S. mortgage crisis of the late 2000s is to analyze two important causes that have thus far only been discussed in passing. First, this article provides evidence that fragmentation of the securitization market in the mid-2000s and competition between mortgage securitizers undermined securitizers’ ability to control originators, and that such competition led to a race to the bottom on underwriting standards. Second, this article provides evidence of a shift in market power away from securitizers and toward originators during the mid-2000s, and argues that this shift in power …

Information Overload, Multi-Tasking, And The Socially Networked Jury: Why Prosecutors Should Approach The Media Gingerly, Andrew Taslitz

Andrew E. Taslitz

The rise of computer technology, the internet, rapid news dissemination, multi-tasking, and social networking have wrought changes in human psychology that alter how we process news media. More specifically, news coverage of high-profile trials necessarily focuses on emotionally-overwrought, attention-grabbing information disseminated to a public having little ability to process that information critically. The public’s capacity for empathy is likewise reduced, making it harder for trial processes to overcome the unfair prejudice created by the high-profile trial. Market forces magnify these changes. Free speech concerns limit the ability of the law to alter media coverage directly, and the tools available to …

The Reality Of Eu-Conformity Review In France, Juscelino F. Colares

Juscelino F. Colares

French High Courts embraced review of national legislation for conformity with EU law in different stages and following distinct approaches to EU law supremacy. This article tests whether adherence to different views on EU law supremacy has resulted in different levels of EU directive enforcement by the French High Courts. After introducing the complex French systems of statutory, treaty and constitutional review, this study explains how EU-conformity review emerged among these systems and provides an empirical analysis refuting the anecdotal view that different EU supremacy theories produce substantial differences in conformity adjudication outcomes. These Courts' uniformly high rates of EU …

Gray Matters: Autism, Impairment, And The End Of Binaries, Kevin M. Barry

Kevin M Barry

First diagnosed by psychiatrist Leo Kanner in 1943, Autism has exploded into the public consciousness in recent years. From science to science fiction, academia to popular culture, Autism has captured the world’s attention and imagination. Autism has also ignited a fierce debate among stakeholders who seek to define its essence. Many parents of Autistic children regard Autism as a scourge and press for a cure. The Neurodiversity Movement, comprised mostly of Autistic adults, regards Autism as a different way of being worthy of respect and even celebration. The Autism war is well underway and, given Autism’s swelling ranks and proposed …

Gray Matters: Autism, Impairment, And The End Of Binaries, Kevin M. Barry

Kevin M Barry

First diagnosed by psychiatrist Leo Kanner in 1943, Autism has exploded into the public consciousness in recent years. From science to science fiction, academia to popular culture, Autism has captured the world’s attention and imagination. Autism has also ignited a fierce debate among stakeholders who seek to define its essence. Many parents of Autistic children regard Autism as a scourge and press for a cure. The Neurodiversity Movement, comprised mostly of Autistic adults, regards Autism as a different way of being worthy of respect and even celebration. The Autism war is well underway and, given Autism’s swelling ranks and proposed …

Tattoos, Tickets And Other Tawdry Behavior: How Universities Use Federal Law To Hide Their Scandals, Meg Penrose

Meg Penrose

Please find attached a copy of my recently completed article entitled Tattoos, Tickets and Other Tawdry Behavior: How Universities Use Federal Law to Hide Their Scandals. The article challenges the manner in which schools and their athletic departments invert a federal student privacy law, FERPA, to protect unseemly behavior and athletic scandals. Four case studies are presented: the University of Maryland and one athlete's accumulation of over $8,200 in parking fines; North Carolina University's athletic department scandal involving parking tickets and improper benefits (for which, just yesterday, the head football coach was fired and the Athletic Director resigned); Florida State …

Overcoming Cfius Jitters: A Practical Guide For Understanding The Committee On Foreign Investment In The United States, Margaret L. Merrill

Margaret L Merrill

The U.S. has long been an attractive place for foreign investment. Its reputable government and professional enforcement agencies, strong tradition of protecting private property and vibrant middle-class consumer base makes it a prudent investment choice for many foreign investment entities – both private and public. While the U.S. has long championed a free market ethos, it is not devoid of protectionist bias. Starting in 1988, the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) has been charged with monitoring foreign direct investment (FDI) and when necessary recommending that the President block or prohibit FDI transactions that may threaten U.S. …

What Were They Thinking: Competing Culpability Standards For Punishing Threats Made To The President, Craig M. Principe

Craig M Principe

This article revisits the Fourth Circuit‘s holding in United States v. Patillo, 431 F.2d 293 (4th Cir. 1970) (panel), reh’g granted, 438 F.2d 13 (1971) (en banc). Although that decision is almost forty years old, it still remains a source of contention and confusion in the law of threats. It is widely cited as creating a subjective ―present intent‖ requirement for 18 U.S.C. § 871(a) (threats against the president)—a standard that has only been recognized by the Fourth Circuit and stands in stark contrast to the objective Roy/Ragansky Test adopted by virtually all other circuits. Indeed, judges and commentators have …

Hope In Procedure, Brian P. Matthews

Brian P Matthews

No abstract provided.

“Health Laws Of Every Description”: John Marshall’S Ruling On A Federal Health Care Law, David B. Kopel, Robert G. Natelson

David B Kopel

If John Marshall, the greatest of Chief Justices, were to hear a challenge to the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, how would he rule? Would the nationalist justice who, according to the New Deal Supreme Court, “described the Federal commerce power with a breadth never yet exceeded,” agree that federal control of health care was within that power?

In the fictional opinion below, Marshall rules on the constitutionality of a bill similar to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

We constructed this opinion chiefly from direct quotation and paraphrases of Marshall’s own words, …

Shirking The Duty To Defend In Florida: Is Assignment The Exception To Argonaut?, Matthew J. Jowanna

Matthew J. Jowanna

A lawsuit is filed by a plaintiff and the defendant is served. The defendant has a drawer full of liability insurance policies and, therefore, the insured defendant sends a copy of the served complaint to any and all insurance carriers that may provide coverage for the claim. The insured defendant then receives a few coverage denials for reasons such as the event at issue did not occur within a certain policy period or that the insured’s private automobile policy does not provide coverage for a commercial general liability claim. In any event, the denials appear to be valid - so …

Shirking The Duty To Defend In Florida: Is Assignment The Exception To Argonaut?, Matthew J. Jowanna

Matthew J. Jowanna

A lawsuit is filed by a plaintiff and the defendant is served. The defendant has a drawer full of liability insurance policies and, therefore, the insured defendant sends a copy of the served complaint to any and all insurance carriers that may provide coverage for the claim. The insured defendant then receives a few coverage denials for reasons such as the event at issue did not occur within a certain policy period or that the insured’s private automobile policy does not provide coverage for a commercial general liability claim. In any event, the denials appear to be valid -so the …

Healthcare Reform’S Mandatory Medical Loss Ratio: Constitutionality, Policy, And Implementation, Wesley D. Markham

Wesley D Markham

What do Rush Limbaugh and Richard Epstein have in common? They both oppose the medical loss ratio (MLR) provisions in the recently-enacted healthcare reform legislation. After reading this article, so will you. On March 23, 2010, President Obama signed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) into law, as Vice President Biden whispered “this is a big [expletive] deal” in the President’s ear. Unfortunately, as can be expected with any major piece of legislation, the ACA has problems. Those seeking to repeal the ACA have focused primarily on the so-called individual mandate, which requires individuals to purchase health insurance. …

The Kennedy-Hoffa Showdown: Why Congressional Investigations Need Greater Powers And Procedural Leeway Than Prosecutions, Nicholas C. Stewart

Nicholas C Stewart

ABSTRACT:

This 9,400-word article uses the feud between Robert Kennedy and Jimmy Hoffa as a case study to examine how and why congressional investigations differ from criminal prosecutions. It begins with a discussion of the 1950s congressional investigation into labor racketeering. Armed with this illustrative example, the article explores the relationship among (1) the purposes of congressional investigations (namely lawmaking), (2) the powers enjoyed by committees to achieve these purposes, and (3) the protections afforded committee witnesses. Highlighting the dangers inherent in congressional investigations, this article concludes that the ultimate goal of passing or amending laws presents unique challenges that …

The Criminalization Of The Proliferation Of Nuclear Weapons: Providing A Statutory Regime To Criminalize And Prosecute Nuclear Weapons Proliferators., Patrick A. Mcdade

Patrick A. McDade

This article suggests that the current nuclear non-proliferation regime is no longer effective due to a failure to disincentivize the leadership and regime elites who make policy decisions regarding nuclear weapons programs. To counter this problem, the article then proposes two international statutory schemes for the criminalization of the proliferation of nuclear weapons. The first proposal is a draft resolution by the United Nations Security Council that would create an international tribunal to investigate and punish acts of nuclear weapons proliferation. The second proposal consists of draft amendments to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court that would extend …