Law Commons^™

The Information Era Threatens Privacy: A Comparative Study Of Electronic Money’S Privacy Policies And Privacy Laws, Guanru Liu

GUANRU LIU

This thesis consists of an analysis of electronic money (e-money), e-money’s privacy policies and relevant privacy laws. The value of information and the development of technology enhance the risk of privacy violations in the information era. Consumer privacy interests with respect to e-money are governed in part by the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) in Canada and by the European Union’s Data Protection Directive. The analysis is directed at whether the privacy policies of three kinds of e-money – Octopus Card, PayPal and MasterCard – comply with the spirit and letter of these laws. In light of …

Missouri's Innocent Citizens: An Examination Of Missouri's Response To Domestic Violence Incidents Against Children And Teens, Keith P. Freie

Keith P Freie

In 2010 the Missouri Attorney’s General’s Office created a Domestic Violence Task Force for the purpose of analyzing Missouri’s Domestic Violence laws. In 2011, the Missouri General Assembly enacted Senate Bill 320 which included several changes to Missouri’s domestic violence laws stemming from several recommendations from the Attorney General’s Task Force. While Missouri’s 2011 domestic violence law is a comprehensive solution to the many unaddressed needs of child and teen domestic violence victims, additional solutions need to be considered to fully address the problem. Those solutions may include creating special domestic violence and child abuse courts and creating educational programs …

Blatant Bribery Or Locally Lawful?: Is The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act’S “Local Laws” Defense Extinct?, Erik J. King

Erik J King

Under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), it is an affirmative defense if the payments in question were lawful under the written laws of a foreign country. This defense has been largely overlooked by commentators and used sparingly in the court system. This Note examines the utility of this defense, and finds that although the concept underlying the defense remains somewhat alive in certain types of foreign laws that could conceivably excuse a foreign investor, the defense has lost all practical value. U.S. judicial interpretations, multilateral efforts against similar exceptions in other anti-bribery laws, and the subsuming effect of other …

Historical Development Of Brazilian And European Legislation On Beef And Their Relation In The International Trade, Luis Augusto Nero Dr.

Luis Augusto Nero Dr.

Since the beginning of the XX century, Brazil has developed the industrial exploitation of cattle slaughtering to satisfy both internal market and exportation, mainly to European countries and USA. The laws of importing countries on cattle health and beef safety have always been a benchmark for Brazilian ones, since the very beginning of beef industry, until the promulgation of WTO-SPS agreement. The aim of this article is to compare the historical development of Brazilian and European food laws concerning beef, and to establish associations between law-making and Brazilian beef production and exportation

The President, The Environment, And Foreign Policy: The Globalization Of Environmental Politics, David A. Wirth

David A. Wirth

By comparison with domestic environmental issues, international environmental diplomacy is distinguished by the far greater role of the Executive Branch, and in particular the President, in making law. This essay explores the legal consequences of the President's dual role in international environmental diplomacy: his duty faithfully to execute statutory mandates adopted by Congress while also serving as the Nation's chief diplomat and negotiator of international agreements with foreign powers. The piece discusses the legal and policy dynamics surrounding two concrete examples affecting domestic and international environmental policy, in which Presidential power assumes dramatically different forms: (1) climate change, and in …

The Better Part Of Valor: The Real Id Act, Discretion, And The “Rule” Of Immigration Law, Daniel Kanstroom

Daniel Kanstroom

This article considers the problems raised by a federal law--the “REAL ID Act”--that seeks to preclude judicial review of discretionary immigration law decisions. Discretion, the flexible shock absorber of the administrative state, must be respected by our legal system. However, as Justice Felix Frankfurter once wrote, discretion is, “only to be respected when it is conscious of the traditions which surround it and of the limits which an informed conscience sets to its exercise.” The article suggests that judicial construction of the REAL ID Act will plumb the deep meaning of this qualification. The new law states, essentially, that constitutional …

What Should Guide Determinations Of Foreign Official Immunity In Us Courts After Samantar?, Chris C. Morley

Chris C Morley

In the recent Samantar decision, the Supreme Court held that individual foreign officials were not covered by the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act but might still be covered by common law immunity. This article analyzes the extent of that common law immunity and discusses whether more recent developments in domestic and international human rights law should impact the availability of immunity for officials accused of torture, extra-judicial killings, and other violations of the law of nations.

Although the bulk of authority from US and foreign courts suggests that foreign officials should enjoy immunity for acts committed within the scope of their …

The Toll Road Not Taken: Could The One Option Less Used Make A Difference?, Carlos C. Sun

Carlos C Sun

There is a growing transportation financing crisis in the United States caused by a rapidly aging transportation infrastructure, a growing demand for transportation, soaring infrastructure costs and a lack of systematic planning to account for these multiple trends. Potholes, deteriorating bridges and cracked pavements are everywhere, regardless of geographical location, climate or population density. Such infrastructure deterioration negatively impacts the environment via pollution, wasted fuel and inefficient travel patterns. Courts in states such as California have responded pragmatically to the crisis by opening the door to road tolling in various forms. This shift in states’ attitudes toward toll roads comes …

Applying Anti-Money Laundering/Anti-Terrorist Financing Controls To The United States Legal Profession: A Response To The Senate Permanent Subcommittee Report On The Proceeds Of Foreign Corruption, Nicholas S. Kazmerski

Nicholas S. Kazmerski

"Applying Anti-Money Laundering/Anti-Terrorist Financing Controls to the United States Legal Profession: A Response to the Senate Permanent Subcommittee Report on the Proceeds of Foreign Corruption" ***Abstract:This paper examines and comments on the reforms to the U.S. legal profession as proposed by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee Report on the Proceeds of Foreign Corruption (issued February 2010), specifically whether these proposed reforms are realistic or necessary given the existing attorney regulatory framework. To do so, it will first be necessary to provide a general overview of money laundering/terrorist financing followed by a background of anti-money laundering regulation starting with the Bank Secrecy …

Save The Economy: Break Up The Big Banks And Shape Up The Regulators, Charles W. Murdock

Charles W. Murdock

Save the Economy: Break Up the Big Banks and Shape Up the Regulators

The U.S. economy is still reeling from the financial crisis that exploded in the fall of 2008. This article asserts that the big banks were major culprits in causing the crisis, by funding the non-bank lenders that created the toxic mortgages which the big banks securitized and sold to unwary investors. Paradoxically, banks which were then too big to fail are even larger today.

The article briefly reviews the history of banking from the Founding Fathers to the deregulatory mindset that has been present since 1980. It …

Checking The Staats: How Long Is Too Long To Give Adequate Public Notice In Broadening Reissue Patent Applications?, David M. Longo

David M. Longo

No abstract provided.

Florida S.B. 1196 And Condominium Assessment Collection Measures Sweeping Or Sleeping?, Rose Brill

Rose Brill

FLORIDA S.B. 1196 AND CONDOMINIUM ASSESSMENT COLLECTION MEASURES: SWEEPING OR SLEEPING? Florida’s recent Senate Bill 1196 (2010) has created waves in the condominium law arena. This article suggests that by considering various issues that have arisen in the legal community since July 1, 2010, the Bill’s effective date, condominiums will be better able to collect the assessments they need to maintain and improve their buildings. Healthier condominiums will instill confidence in the housing market, generate interest in condominium purchases, and play a role in the overall economic recovery. In particular, the article analyzes two of the Bill’s most contentious provisions, …

The Myth Of Investor Protection: The Dodd-Frank Act And The Office Of The Investor Advocate, Chelsea Ferrette

Chelsea P. Ferrette

Are security investors protected when investor advocacy is a form of regulation? This article asks that question and answers “no.” This article looks at the SEC’s Office of the Investor Advocate (“OIA”) mandated by the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010. The OIA’s prime-objective is the advocacy and protection of investors. The OIA plans to meet its objective by ensuring retail investors’ interests are adequately represented, assisting them in conflict resolution, and identifying areas where regulatory changes benefit investors. This article posits, however, that the OIA cannot achieve its goals, because, first, the ever-increasing complexity of financial securities; second, the conflicts of …

Codifying Bankruptcy Law's Fastpass: New Value And The Absolute Priority Rule, David P. Hamm Jr

David P Hamm Jr

The notion behind the absolute priority rule is not novel to any of us. We all learned at a very young age that if someone is in front of you in line—they get served first. This basic notion of fairness affects our lives in several everyday contexts—including bankruptcy. The people in the “bankruptcy” line are the holders of interests in the debtor. If the interest held by party A is “senior” to that of party B, then party A is in front of party B in line. The absolute priority rule essentially provides that the party A must be paid …

Enforcing The Enforcer: Enhancing The Fbi’S Accountability For The Use Of National Security Letters, Joshua C. Mcdaniel

Joshua C. McDaniel

In 2007, the U.S. Justice Department’s Office of the Inspector General issued the first in a series of three reports revealing that on thousands of occasions the FBI had improperly or illegally used its authority to issue national security letters. The national security letter enables the FBI to obtain confidential customer information from banks, ISPs, telephone companies, and other institutions without first obtaining a warrant or a grand jury subpoena and without the customer ever realizing.

This Comment argues that the abuses of NSL authority revealed in the Inspector General’s reports result significantly from the FBI’s lack of horizontal accountability …

U.S. Trade Policy: Increased Emphasis On Worker Rights, Marisa Anne Pagnattaro

marisa pagnattaro

This paper analyzes the increasing focus on worker rights, including the attempt to balance the interests of domestic and international workers, in U.S. trade policy. Part I reviews selected actions asserted by labor unions over the decade prior to the Obama administration, with particular emphasis on the Bush Administration steel tariffs. Part II analyzes two actions taken in 2009, one halting the NAFTA plan to allow trucks from Mexico into the United States. and a second that placed tariffs on tires imported from China. Part III considers the current CAFTA-DR request for consultations with Guatemala for labor rights violations. Part …

The Creation And Destruction Of Price Cartels: An Evolutionary Theory, William Bradford

william bradford

This Article sketches the goals of antitrust law, describes the causes and effects of anticompetitive pricing generally and supracompetitive pricing specifically, explains the inability of antitrust law to suppress some instances of supracompetitive pricing, establishes the importance of trust between firms as a necessary condition for supracompetitive pricing, and illustrates how the strategic exchange of information is crucial to the creation and destruction of trust and thus to the evolution and devolution of price cartels. Part II develops a positive theory that explains and predicts the evolution and devolution of price cartels as a function of the ability of rival …

Chevron As A Doctrine Of Hard Cases, Frederick Liu

Frederick Liu

The conventional wisdom holds that the Chevron doctrine rests on a presumption about congressional intent—a presumption that when a statute is ambiguous, Congress intended the gap to be filled by the agency charged with administering the statute. But the presumption is a mere fiction; Congress generally has no view on whether ambiguities in a statute should be resolved by the agency or the court. This Article proposes a new theory of Chevron, one that rests on a simple reality: No matter how determinate the law may seem, there will inevitably be hard cases—cases in which the law runs out before …

When Mistakes Matter: Election Error And The Dynamic Assessment Of Materiality, Justin Levitt

Justin Levitt

The ghosts of the 2000 presidential election will return in 2012. Photo-finish, and error-laden, elections recur in each cycle. When the margin of error exceeds the margin of victory, officials and courts must decide which, if any, errors to discount or excuse, knowing that the answer will likely determine the election’s winner. Yet in the past eleven years, despite widespread agreement on the likelihood of another meltdown, neither courts nor scholars have developed consistent principles for resolving the errors that cause the chaos.

This Article advances such a principle. It argues that the resolution of an election error should turn …

When Mistakes Matter: Election Error And The Dynamic Assessment Of Materiality, Justin Levitt

Justin Levitt

The ghosts of the 2000 presidential election will return in 2012. Photo-finish, and error-laden, elections recur in each cycle. When the margin of error exceeds the margin of victory, officials and courts must decide which, if any, errors to discount or excuse, knowing that the answer will likely determine the election’s winner. Yet in the past eleven years, despite widespread agreement on the likelihood of another meltdown, neither courts nor scholars have developed consistent principles for resolving the errors that cause the chaos.

This Article advances such a principle. It argues that the resolution of an election error should turn …

Committing Crimes One Bill At A Time; From The White House To The Jail House, Enacting Rational Laws In An Irrational World, Lanessa Owens

Lanessa L. owens

Committing Crimes One Bill At Time; From The White House To The Jail House, Enacting Rational Laws In An Irrational World.

From Masters’ and Slaves’, to Gays’ and Straights’, you think they are different; I will convince you they are the same. I will demonstrate how legislatures have historically and continually abused their power to enact laws. Under the disguise of some governmental interest, legislatures continue to create, enact, and enforce bias laws. This article imports Criminal Procedure into Constitutional Law to create a proactive solution to the ongoing problem of law making. It is this author contention that the …

Committing Crimes One Bill At A Time; From The White House To The Jail House, Enacting Rational Laws In An Irrational World, Lanessa Owens

Lanessa L. owens

Committing Crimes One Bill At Time; From The White House To The Jail House, Enacting Rational Laws In An Irrational World. From Masters’ and Slaves’, to Gays’ and Straights’, you think they are different; I will convince you they are the same. I will demonstrate how legislatures have historically and continually abused their power to enact laws. Under the disguise of some governmental interest, legislatures continue to create, enact, and enforce bias laws. This article imports Criminal Procedure into Constitutional Law to create a proactive solution to the ongoing problem of law making. It is this author contention that the …

Committing Crimes One Bill At A Time; From The White House To The Jail House, Enacting Rational Laws In An Irrational World, Lanessa Owens

Lanessa L. owens

Committing Crimes One Bill At Time; From The White House To The Jail House, Enacting Rational Laws In An Irrational World. From Masters’ and Slaves’, to Gays’ and Straights’, you think they are different; I will convince you they are the same. I will demonstrate how legislatures have historically and continually abused their power to enact laws. Under the disguise of some governmental interest, legislatures continue to create, enact, and enforce bias laws. This article imports Criminal Procedure into Constitutional Law to create a proactive solution to the ongoing problem of law making. It is this author contention that the …

Gray Matters: Autism, Impairment, And The End Of Binaries, Kevin M. Barry

Kevin M Barry

First diagnosed by psychiatrist Leo Kanner in 1943, Autism has exploded into the public consciousness in recent years. From science to science fiction, academia to popular culture, Autism has captured the world’s attention and imagination. Autism has also ignited a fierce debate among stakeholders who seek to define its essence. Many parents of Autistic children regard Autism as a scourge and press for a cure. The Neurodiversity Movement, comprised mostly of Autistic adults, regards Autism as a different way of being worthy of respect and even celebration. The Autism war is well underway and, given Autism’s swelling ranks and proposed …

Delegating Supremacy?, David S. Rubenstein

David S Rubenstein

The Court has held that federal agencies may preempt state law in much the same way as Congress. While the Supremacy Clause clearly empowers Congress to displace state law, administrative preemption rests on the undertheorized assumption that Congress may “delegate supremacy” to agencies. This Article challenges the constitutionality of that premise and imagines an unfolding system where agencies are stripped of the power to create supreme federal law. My proposal will no doubt be controversial because of the significant implications it holds for federalism and the operation of modern government. Some of the more serious implications include the substantive displacement …

Is Competition The Solution Or The Problem? An Analysis Of U.S. Mortgage Securitization, Michael N. Simkovic

Michael N Simkovic

This article’s original contribution to the literature about the causes of the U.S. mortgage crisis of the late 2000s is to analyze two important causes that have thus far only been discussed in passing. First, this article provides evidence that fragmentation of the securitization market in the mid-2000s and competition between mortgage securitizers undermined securitizers’ ability to control originators, and that such competition led to a race to the bottom on underwriting standards. Second, this article provides evidence of a shift in market power away from securitizers and toward originators during the mid-2000s, and argues that this shift in power …

Information Overload, Multi-Tasking, And The Socially Networked Jury: Why Prosecutors Should Approach The Media Gingerly, Andrew Taslitz

Andrew E. Taslitz

The rise of computer technology, the internet, rapid news dissemination, multi-tasking, and social networking have wrought changes in human psychology that alter how we process news media. More specifically, news coverage of high-profile trials necessarily focuses on emotionally-overwrought, attention-grabbing information disseminated to a public having little ability to process that information critically. The public’s capacity for empathy is likewise reduced, making it harder for trial processes to overcome the unfair prejudice created by the high-profile trial. Market forces magnify these changes. Free speech concerns limit the ability of the law to alter media coverage directly, and the tools available to …

Rhetoric, Reality & The Wrongful Abrogation Of The Collateral Source Rule In Personal Injury Cases., Lori A. Roberts

Lori A Roberts

RHETORIC, REALITY & THE WRONGFUL ABROGATION OF THE COLLATERAL SOURCE RULE IN PERSONAL INJURY CASES. LORI A. ROBERTS Abstract: There are few certainties in litigation, but one that any injured plaintiff with health care insurance can rely on is that a defendant-tortfeasor will argue that the plaintiff’s health care bills are “illusory” and that the plaintiff will recover a “windfall” if he is allowed to recover the full amount of those bills as economic damages. The issue addressed in this Article, whether the difference between the billed rate for medical care and the actual amount paid by a plaintiff’s insurer …

The Reality Of Eu-Conformity Review In France, Juscelino F. Colares

Juscelino F. Colares

French High Courts embraced review of national legislation for conformity with EU law in different stages and following distinct approaches to EU law supremacy. This article tests whether adherence to different views on EU law supremacy has resulted in different levels of EU directive enforcement by the French High Courts. After introducing the complex French systems of statutory, treaty and constitutional review, this study explains how EU-conformity review emerged among these systems and provides an empirical analysis refuting the anecdotal view that different EU supremacy theories produce substantial differences in conformity adjudication outcomes. These Courts' uniformly high rates of EU …

Gray Matters: Autism, Impairment, And The End Of Binaries, Kevin M. Barry

Kevin M Barry

First diagnosed by psychiatrist Leo Kanner in 1943, Autism has exploded into the public consciousness in recent years. From science to science fiction, academia to popular culture, Autism has captured the world’s attention and imagination. Autism has also ignited a fierce debate among stakeholders who seek to define its essence. Many parents of Autistic children regard Autism as a scourge and press for a cure. The Neurodiversity Movement, comprised mostly of Autistic adults, regards Autism as a different way of being worthy of respect and even celebration. The Autism war is well underway and, given Autism’s swelling ranks and proposed …